Also forced vaccinations, curfews, quarantines, surveillance state. The only real difference is the movie was over the top right wing dictatorship focused on homosexuality. So the typical lefty focuses on that part of it and doesn't see how everything they love about the state is portrayed by this evil dictatorship. They don't see the irony.
Not much of a closet...
That was glowie entrapment bullshit. They never charged him with it, the judge did not allow the defense to make any statement on it, yet the jury was allowed to hear it. Again, he was in no way charged with anything having to do with murder, attempted murder, or anything of the sort. Undercover feds approached him claiming that all his users personal info had been leaked, and they were going to put it on the web unless he paid ransom, then another undercover fed approached him as a hitman to offer to take care of it. they were working together, they got him on text not immediately saying no, and they used that to poison the well. He was screwed.
It's already been sold. Years ago.
FBI fucked him over. Undercover agent approached him saying that he had the personal info of all the users, was going to leak it, then another undercover agent approached him posing as a hitman offering to take care of the problem. They allegedly discussed but it didn't go any futher. Meanwhile the FBI agent assigned to his case stole thousands of bitcoin after they arrested him, and he was going to retire to some island before he got caught. Keep in mind Ulbricht was charged with none of this, and his attorneys weren't allowed to explain or defend against any of it, yet the prosecution was able to bring it up and intimate to the jury that he was maybe possibly involved in murder for hire, completely poisoning the well.
Bottom line, Ulbricht made a website, that's it. He wasn't selling the drugs. He was darkweb craigslist using bitcoin. And they gave him 2 life sentences for it. Complete horseshit. He has served almost a decade. Time to let him go.
You sure? Cuz I'm thinking today. Will it be today?
kinda like the fbi
Just in time for the big reveal, eh?
I only wish there were more hours in the day, so I could devote them to not watching Fox even more than I already don't.
This was probably an inside jerb by Trump and the guys who tried to kidnap Whitmer /s (but also not /s since I know people will immediately jump to this conclusion)
And whatdoyaknow...Belarus was specifically mentioned in the COVID bill as having run a fraudulent election.
I want trump to start tweeting even more basic, sarcastic stuff. HEY WAIT A SECOND, I JUST HAD A THOUGHT - WHAT IF THE ELECTION WAS RIGGED?
I get what you're saying. TDW is different things to different people. I'll say personally that Sunday gunday bugs me, but I get that a lot of people enjoy it, and it's important to see how many pround gun owners there are out there. So some people want TDW to be a hub for mobilizing the maga movement (everything else gets shut down). Other people just want news/infotainment. Some people want kfc memes... Hard to keep everyone happy.
It's part of the reason I constantly refresh new and rising, because the stickies tend to be dumb. But maybe the mods know that and it drives traffic!
It wasn't a stawman. Just asserting something is a fallacy is itself a fallacy.
My entire point was limited to the idea that freedom of speech has nothing to do with OP's point, much like the second amendment would have nothing to do with making fun of a guy for using a girly gun.
You insisting that I respond to some other aspect of OP's post because you think it's important doesn't make what I say a strawman. If you're actually interested in healthy debate, you would see that.
Also, if you're interested in healthy debate, you wouldn't go straight to ad hominem ("you argue like a leftist").
Freedom of speech has never implied uncritical acceptance of everything people say. If OP finds calling trump "daddy" to be embarrassing, you might agree or disagree, but it never had anything to do with freedom of speech. You aren't standing up for freedom of speech by telling OP not to share his opinion.
If Tom and Bob walk by Joe, and Joe has a pink gun, and Bob says "Hey Tom look at Joe's girly gun haha, how silly!" Then Sam comes along and says, "you know guys, the second amendment protects his right to have a pink gun"...it's true but what does that have to do with anything?
So whether the practice of calling the president daddy makes users of this site look silly or not, it makes no sense to appeal to the idea of freedom of speech, since that was a given. By your standard, you would never be able to criticize any statements whatsoever, cuz freedom of speech. That would include strawman arguments.
You are all over the place. Congrats on your internet victory I guess.
Free speech just means the state isn't allowed to throw you in jail for what you say...it doesn't mean having no consequences for what you say.
Freedom of religion just means the state can't prevent you from worshiping however you want, but it doesn't mean you won't face social backlash for worshiping satan, for example.
As to the "making us look silly" thing, I'm not responding to that, because I don't personally identify with this site, so nothing on here can make me personally look silly. It's an anonymous forum. But that doesn't mean whoever says that is threatening free speech. These concepts have nothing to do with one another.
Can you explain why something making us look silly would violate the first amendment? That would need to apply for my statement to be a strawman.
Don't think I've ever seen a Chinese person with a roman nose.
They know deep down that white people aren't actually racist, but they don't know the threat that the Chinese pose to them.
China has been pushing the race stuff in America for decades now, to weaken us and stoke internal strife. But call a Chinese person racist and they will laugh in your face and agree with you. They don't give a shit, and they believe they are the master race.
Not at all... I'm referring to your claim that criticizing a post that calls trump daddy somehow violates freedom of speech.
Freedom of speech, like 2a, doesn't mean people can't make fun of others for their choices.
Here is your argument on free speech, but applied to 2A:
Mocking a grown man for owning a hot pink gun is a violation of his second amendment rights, which is an improper opinion for an american.
No you're not the only one. It's fucking strange. Though I will say it is funny in the sense that people with TDS assume anyone who doesn't hate him is in a cult, so imagining them coming here and seeing a stickied post calling him daddy is funny. They don't have the empathy required to get that it's a joke.
The only problem is I'm not sure if it's a joke for everyone. But whatever.
Which black life matters more? On one hand we have a straight cis male, on the other hand we have a straight cis female. Both black. On paper she has the upper hand, because she isn't male. But then again he is running for powerful office for the Democrats, and she is now trying to stop him. So that means her black life matters less and we must ignore whatever she is saying, unless he ever does anything to get on the mob's bad side in the future. Then we will all immediately get outraged at him and destroy his entire life.