1
22ct 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please see the rules regarding doxxing.

I suggest you contact a decent reporter/journalist if you have some material information. They have experience in dealing with this kind of thing. Revealing personal information here is not the way to go about it.

0
22ct 0 points ago +1 / -1

Doomers fall under the new "High Energy" rule.

It's up to you to use discretion when it comes to differentiating between doomers and a Trump supporter who needs encouragement.

11
22ct 11 points ago +11 / -0

if the virus was more deadly

The deep state:

Hold my banks

2
22ct 2 points ago +2 / -0

I accidentally clicked your link to Facebook and now I need a shower :P

Happy new year pede!

1
22ct 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've only seen Boris referred to as a "Strategic Advisor" on the campaign.

3
22ct 3 points ago +3 / -0

Only Jenna and Rudy are.

There's also Joseph diGenova and Victoria Toensing

2
22ct 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice discourse about Lin. I think people are skeptical and at the moment have only seen a lot of talk come from Lin. I'd say Lin is riding the hype-train a little too much. I haven't completely written him off.

The proof is in the pudding. Let's see some pudding.

4
22ct 4 points ago +4 / -0

Better than the earlier NewsMax (Bloomberg) coverage, and more level-headed than the Jim Hoft piece, but we shouldn't pass judgement against Pence based on the headlines.

Not all the chips haven't landed yet.

2
22ct 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not buying that it's a coincidence pede and good work.

See also the Intel CEO dumping a bunch of his stocks before SPECTRE and MELTDOWN vulnerabilities were made public. Totally legit transaction right there.

Responsible disclosure gives these people a head start.

3
22ct 3 points ago +3 / -0

I understand that you did not advocate for mandatory vaccinations, but public health authorities ARE and that is what has people scared and/or pissed off.

People are revolting against the idea of a mandatory vaccine by attacking the vaccines themselves.

I don't think that's the right approach. People should be able to say no to the vaccine simply because that is their right. People should be arguing that they are being stripped of their rights, because that IS the truth and that is not fear-mongering.

1
22ct 1 point ago +1 / -0

Understand that it all sprouts from the idea that the vaccine should be mandatory.

The vaccine should clearly NOT be mandatory.

What's the best argument we have against mandatory vaccination?

Civil liberties, the rights of the individual.

Have the very same elite who are pushing for mandatory vaccinations shown you anything to suggest that they care about individual rights or civil liberties?

No.

What arguments does that leave you with?

4
22ct 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'd say most people are anti-mandatory-vax but a lot of times the way in which it's expressed is with anti-vax sentiment.

4
22ct 4 points ago +4 / -0

I hope not pede, but we will know soon enough.

1
22ct 1 point ago +1 / -0

I had to laugh at this one:

https://news.engineering.utoronto.ca/two-engineering-alumni-named-canadas-top-40-40/

build a voting system that was so transparent even the most skeptical critic would have confidence in its accuracy

Dated 2014. The propaganda machine has really been working overtime on these guys.

1
22ct 1 point ago +1 / -0

Keep it together, patriot.

Here's what I could find:

DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Business Number (BN): -
Registry ID: 1998653
Registered Office Location: TORONTO, Ontario
Status: Active
Status Notes: Active
Business Type: Ontario Business Corporation
Created: 2018-07-13

Which I guess you have found already. I will see what else I can come up with.

3
22ct 3 points ago +3 / -0

CrowdStrike is indeed very shady.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›