4
2Scoops2Terms2Walls 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not the exact same problems but similar. This kind of stuff is taught in many/most American schools and that is enforced by culture, society, government, etc. that's my point. And if you talked about marauding bands of blacks/Hispanics raping women, you would have your life ruined but sure no police at your door.

4
2Scoops2Terms2Walls 4 points ago +4 / -0

Definitely partially dehumanization. It disarms whites by teaching us when we are kid to never defend our group. It also is a humiliation tactic so that every part of society is hell-bent on degrading us. It also convinces other groups that we deserve oppression(and that they can gain by oppressing us) so that we have less ability to resist.

4
2Scoops2Terms2Walls 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't know how, I've been advocating for it for a while but I don't know how. If we network we can insulate and influence especially the schools. But you're right, we are speaking into a brick wall. The GOP doesn't care about us. We only have ourselves. I just don't know how.

3
2Scoops2Terms2Walls 3 points ago +3 / -0

This picture used to be my phone background minus the text

4
2Scoops2Terms2Walls 4 points ago +5 / -1

Interesting retort because you're arguing within the framework defined by the left, while posting on a right wing site that promotes individualism- I'm a fierce individualist, and this is an area we on the right need to reframe on our terms and not the left's, because this kind of rhetoric you just displayed is absolutely collectivist ideology which I imagine you do not intend to espouse being a conservative.

I'm not a fierce individualist. I find that "individualism" usually means we are individuals who don't stand up for each other so that any collective can rape and kill us at will and we'll never stop them. Not sure I even consider myself a conservative anymore when modern "conservatism" means pandering to nonwhites and playing identity-politics for them but ignoring whites and demonize white identity-politics.

If that seems like a lot, bear with me: statistics are statistics, and no one should ever say the statistics warrant a racial generalization that is blanketed across an entire populace specifically BECAUSE we are an individualist society. So you can't be a pro-individualist, while simultaneously arguing based on collectivist ideas and thereby inferring that because interracial felonies happen at a 90% black on white rate, that those crimes are racially driven

Not really much of an individualist anymore so I think collective terms are fine.

I know you probably don't intend this, but this is inevitably what yo infer, especially when you say whites shouldn't be subjected to crimes especially by racial outsiders. You've just taken the left wing bait, and are now engaged in tribal ideology, which is the framework that logically justifies collectivist ideology. I.E., your feelings and not thoughts are driving you to conclusions the left WANTS you to conclude. You've taken the low hanging bait.

I haven't taken the "left wing bait". The left wants nothing less than white people standing up for themselves. There is nothing that scares them more than white collectivization. Do you really think they're afraid of a multiracial globalist GOP that refuses to stand for anything of value? Don't think so.

The appropriate way to frame this narrative is to highlight how disingenuous the BLM movement is, how there is a war on white people specifically driving towards a collectivist agenda of creating tribal warfare by suppressing all crimes by black people, but the thing you must do is indicate that black people are a group of individuals, and no one person, or percentage of the population NO MATTER HOW HIGH, is to apply to THE ENTIRE RACE.

If I handed you 2 bowls of M&Ms and said in bowl A there were 5 poisoned M&Ms and in bowl B there were 50, which would you choose from if you had to? If I gave you a bowl of M&Ms and said half of them were poisoned, would you take from it? Not to mention that white people are my own people. Every assault/rape/murder/etc of white people by a racial outsider is 100% preventable through separation.

The actions of any individual or groups of individuals under 100% of the population, still do not justify blanketing the entire demographic, or you are literally becoming a collectivist, which then evolves the rest of your logic into collectivist ideas, which then pushes you on the path towards becoming a globalist on a different side of the aisle- but one in which inevitably unites against individualist ideals. The foundation of conservatism is the individual, and you are now resorting to collectivist logic. That's the slippery slope because confirmation bias can easily push you, and before you know it, You're right along with David Duke backing Joe Biden.

Again, there is nothing the left wants more than white people to be individualists while nonwhites are collectivists. Look at what's happening to our entire civilization for fucks sake. Just ~50 years of "individualism" and we are being raped by the thousands and killed in the streets while foreigners flood our countries to replace us and the entire establishment sides with THEM. We have NO representation, NO defense, NO way out as individuals.

When an army approached a castle, do you think the men on the walls said "well maybe some of them aren't so bad, we can't judge the whole bunch!"? Do you think they said "why would I defend the castle, I'm an individual! Rape our children and women and kill us in the streets, it's okay because they have no connection to me!"?

7
2Scoops2Terms2Walls 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes that is exactly what I am arguing for. I don't think diversity works. What it seems like is diversity requires white people to ignore race so foreigners can rape and kill us into extinction and we don't say a word about it.

27
2Scoops2Terms2Walls 27 points ago +28 / -1

Nonsense. Interracial violent felonies between blacks and whites are 90% black-on-white. You are arguing we ignore the obvious. Why? Whites shouldn't be subjected to assault, rape, and murder ESPECIALLY by racial outsiders who do it at higher rates.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›