42
308win 42 points ago +44 / -2

Holy shit...that Bruce Jenner clip hahahaa!!!!

11
308win 11 points ago +11 / -0

The look of a woman who followed the establishment...only to have the establishment fuck you.

3
308win 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck the tyrants.

10
308win 10 points ago +10 / -0

I remember serving in the Navy under Obama. And they pushed the transgender shit. I remember a black female sailor said she was not sharing a shower with and bunking with "a person who had a penis." And a Commander responded to her and said "Get the fuck out of MY Navy!"

That was when I realized the higher ups in the military were a bunch of liberal faggots.

2
308win 2 points ago +2 / -0

Black people already had their rent paid and their personal debt covered. But...they wanted freedom. Republicans gave them that freedom. Now they want democrats to put them back under other people's care and ownership?

Holy fuck.

5
308win 5 points ago +5 / -0

The firing on Fort Sumter was the spark or incident that got it going. But it was 20 or so years in the making beforehand.

3
308win 3 points ago +3 / -0

“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined…” – George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790

“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787

“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

“The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776

2
308win 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holy shit...these "woke" people are gonna erase anything and everything tied to minorities before long.

1
308win 1 point ago +1 / -0

Im just saying fuck this cunt for wanting to broaden his arrest powers to cover crimes that may or may not happen. All because he did studies and shit. What he wants to do is straight up fucked. Because it sorta skirts around having to have proof that a crime was committed and just allows him to say..."well...a bunch of other people end up commiting crimes when they fail the check. So...just arrest beforehand." That is some minority report type shit there.

I dont know about you...but the government fucks up...a lot....when it comes to records. And I dont want to be thrown in pruson because someone fucked up on my paperwork and I failed the backgroumd check. Then the ATF comes knocking. Fuck that shit.

1
308win 1 point ago +1 / -0

No shit it is illigal to lie on the form. What I am talking about is failing the damn background check. It is not a crime to FAIL the check. I didnt say lie on the damn form. I said FAIL. IT. IS. NOT.A. CRIME. And this guy wants to arrest you when you fail the check so you dont possibly commit a crime of gun violence in the future.

1
308win 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not shit. Dude....seriously. This covers if they falsify the information to gain the gun. Like I said earlier....faking ID to get gun. Do you not pay attentention?

Also..IT SAYS AQUISITION. AGAIN. Proving my point. You have to have the fucking gun to be charged with the damn crime. Attempted aquisition...bribing...paying to get gun. Again...going over what Ibsaid earlier. Those are the crimes.

So again...to fail the check is not illegal. That is what it is there for. Its not there to broaden so this fucker can arrest people before the crime (abtaining the gun) is actually done.

Holy fuck dude.

1
308win 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is illegal to get the gun. Yes. But its a check. Its not illigal to do a background check and fail it. You wont get arrested. You just get denied and get your money back. Thats the purpose of the check.

I have a degree in criminal law.

1
308win 1 point ago +1 / -0

Background checks. He is talking about failing background checks and getting them when they fail the check. Its a check. You cant arrest someone for failing a check. That isnt a crime. The check is a process. You fail....you get your money back...you get no gun. Pretty simple. It stopped a crime from happening. But it isnt a crime to fail the check. Thats what it is there for. Its to check and stop people from committing the crime. That is the preventative measure.

This guy wants to make it a crime. He wants to expand the crime to include the preventative measure and punish those who fail the preventative mesure. Because he is "smart" and collected data and shit.

What is next? You fail your eyesight check to get a drivers license? We gonna get arrested for that shit too? You see the point?

In order for a crime to be committed, a felon has to obtain a gun or make an act to illegally obtain the gun...they have to pass off money, bribe, fake who they are, or steal. This is the ACT of trying to get the gun. Failing a background check isnt a crime. At least...not right now.

3
308win 3 points ago +3 / -0

"This is a perfect opportunity to arrest people before committing crimes."

You need to commit a crime before you are arrested, detained, and charged. We have rights.

This guy doesnt see it that way. He wants to get people before they have the opportunity to commit a crime. Problem is you need a commit an act that is criminal to be charged and sentenced. I know what he is trying to do is preventative....however...its pretty damn sticky situation and its gonna be hard to get charges to stick. So good for him that he is ATF head...those issues wont be a problem.

Now lets say he comes after "Deadoverred" and says that shit to a judge and he is preventing a crime from happening yet you didnt commit a crime....bro....you would be sooooo fucked. I dont want to see you fucked. Or anyone else for that matter.

So...yeah...this is a MAJOR FUCKING ISSUE.

3
308win 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gonna repeat myself........arrest people before they commit crimes. This is his mindset. You think this mindset is just with this little action? Or do you think he applies this line of thinking in other areas and other laws?

7
308win 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Arrest people before committing crimes."

Thats all I needed to read to make up my mind.

4
308win 4 points ago +4 / -0

He doesnt wear the pants in that relationship.

41
308win 41 points ago +42 / -1

iT wOnT bRiNg hIm BaCk. No shit. But murder needs to be punished you moron. Even if it is by a 13 and 15 year old. The action to murder a person is not acceptable and should be dealt with. Dont care who the perp is. Its what the perp did.

3
308win 3 points ago +3 / -0

The man that came up with this picture was arrested in the UK over it. The irony of it all.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›