1
420praiseit894 1 point ago +1 / -0

If Biden takes office the government is no longer abiding by the social contract. This vote was invalid. Those who say they'd rather see Biden than conflict are the same Reagan talked about in his famous "time for choosing" speech, who would say "better red than dead". I encourage you to listen to the speech in whole because it is incredible, but I will post here the final passage.

"You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin -- just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well it's a simple answer after all.

You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will not pay." "There is a point beyond which they must not advance." And this -- this is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through strength." Winston Churchill said, "The destiny of man is not measured by material computations. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we're spirits -- not animals." And he said, "There's something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty."

You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.

We'll preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness."

Full video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXBswFfh6AY

1
420praiseit894 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thought I'd provide some clarification, since I got lost looking for info on why pedes say dan crenshaw is an asshole (and they're right) that is some tacticool bullshit some people practice with handguns like how some people do thumb-over-bore grip on a rifle. He's not being completely retarded here. It's a position meant for indoors / close quarters retention.

1
420praiseit894 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why the fuck is a full reading of the bill before congress not a mandatory PART OF VOTING ON ANY BILL?

Voting on something without reading it when your whole JOB IS TO READ THESE THINGS, is DERELICTION OF DUTY.

1
420praiseit894 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who fucking signed this shit List names JAIL TIME

4
420praiseit894 4 points ago +6 / -2

My guy you need to chill the fuck out. This is not "covert ops metal gear solid" bullshit time. There are going to be tens to hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of people in DC. You're not gonna be stealthy. There are gonna be normies all over the place.

1
420praiseit894 1 point ago +1 / -0

Earning it, through service that imposes personal risk and suffering and shows your willingness to sacrifice for the body politic. Not inheritable. That is a standard. Why bother to reply if you don't bother to read posts?

3
420praiseit894 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pal, the problem of mental weakness, greed and lack of principles affects both genders. While you may be able to blame a lot of it on women, it would be unjust to lay the blame on women collectively - collectivism is for leftists. There is a more perfect solution.

Our founding fathers had a requirement for voting - universal franchise was never something they thought would be worthwhile. However, that requirement was one of their human errors - it was short sighted. Owning property is not a reliable proof of buy-in, nor is it easily available anymore. Further it has no bearing on a person's honor. A more perfect system will be, in the event of a constitution 2.0, a starship troopers style method of civic service to earn your vote by proving your sense of civic duty and willingness to sacrifice. If you haven't read the book, while it focuses on the military, it makes mention of other dangerous, difficult and poorly compensated methods of service to earn one's franchise. It's not at all a military dictatorship like the movie or the lying left would like to represent. For an example of what we could see as a non-military service, perhaps something like the EMTs could be an option as part of a larger medical service branch that could provide a hard competitor to the corrupt big pharma. EMTs today have shitty, dangerous jobs that get paid far less than they're worth, and if you ask me their job is worth more than some of the jobs available in the military.