Christmas is a Die Hard-holiday...

Makes sense, business wise. When you can't go to restaurants because BLM will show up and harass you, and steal your beer; how are you going to get food?

And women who are married, but would get divorced at the first sign of trouble.

The way they neglect shaving off the five-o'clock shadow... It has to be intentional.

At this point it might be easier to list the people who aren't serving on Soros's boards. There can't be many of them, at this point.

Whatever it paints itself as, this site is currently very much under the protection of 230. Without it, the mods/owners could be sued by anyone who takes issue with something posted here. The fact that moderation of people who go off-topic doesn't remove that protection, is also something that 230 specifically ensures. That's when it's working as intended.

The second part of Trump's EO from a few months back, is the best take I've seen on it; it's the fact that rules are changed on a moment's notice, specifically to catch people out and ruin their business before they can find an alternative platform, that has to be separated away from the protections of 230.

Wrong way around though. It's the claim about election results that are disputed.

Why is it, that we don't condemn them for having been against open borders??

Or you talking to anyone? 'Cause that might be a Logan violation.

To be clear, the actual tallies are delivered from the machines by USB sticks, right? Meaning that they could function fine with no network connection.

Ah yes! The normalcy of corruption, double speak, foreign wars and revolving doors.

That would begin with your apologies, Joe.

The constant pressure campaign of the EU to 'restore democracy' in Hungary and Poland, by trying to restrict their duly elected governments from carrying out their mandates, is a complete disgrace. It's pretty much reached the point of financial blackmail.

Dominion is a red herring, though. If poll watchers were tricked into going home, everything took a sudden pause and then mail-in votes appeared for people who hadn't voted yet in precisely the numbers needed - why then also cheat in the part of the process that can be recounted?

I don't follow your specific claim. Every row with >100% does also have a star on the county name, meaning that they are reconciling, right?

"Pay no attention to..."="It is a conspiracy theory that..."

Nokia

It's the details that sell it.

On the other hand:

Trans women are women

not marked as being disputed.

Secretary of State can't change election law. This should be an 'also, water is wet'-situation.

I dunno. It's weird asking a younger man for advice on 'how to cope'.

Experts who spoke with ABC13 warn that filling a news feed with only like-minded profiles and no fact-checking is dangerous.

Groan

The Trump campaign claimed, without evidence, that time travel is impossible.

No. States can decide how to pick their electors however they want. SC can just make sure they stick to whatever law they've passed.

It doesn't need to be proved that fraud took place. It only needs to be proved that the rules weren't followed. At that point, fraud is the default assumption, that in turn would need to be disproved (which is impossible).

Yes, I'm familiar with the president's thinking. I've learned all about it on CNN.