1
50red 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck constitution because feelings

2
50red 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wasn't CIA effectively just disbanded?

10
50red 10 points ago +10 / -0

Those states couldn't allow to be audited because there's a 100% chance of finding fraud.

SCOTUS is less than 100% so they had to pick the lesser of the two evils.

1
50red 1 point ago +1 / -0

The main reason for Cold-19 was making mail-in ballot fraud credible..

11
50red 11 points ago +11 / -0

The Dems were praying "please don't go state vs state, please don't go state vs state" and probably started popping champagne with 10 minutes left. Then... BOOM.

1
50red 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where's Ohio...

15
50red 15 points ago +15 / -0

The blitz with all the evidence, the hearings, the krakens, was for redpilling a critical mass. Served its purpose perfectly. SCOTUS now sees that it's a case where both sides have "reasonable" arguments. The scales are fairly even know. How to decide? The Constitution.

8
50red 8 points ago +8 / -0

All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.

2
50red 2 points ago +2 / -0

Man, I'm really curious how the media's narrative is going to change it. Why are all these states joining the cause if everything has been DEBOONKED by the twitter itself? Hmmmmm...

12
50red 12 points ago +12 / -0

You're one sick man. I like you.

6
50red 6 points ago +6 / -0

Based states, assemble!

19
50red 19 points ago +19 / -0

Makes sense. What's a neutral court that can look into a state vs state case? SCOTUS. They'll be seeing the evidence because they're the first court to look into it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›