<Hijacking top comment. Sigh pedes. OP is a 9 day old account>
Don't know how old you are, but in most peoples lives; there's been hundreds of members of congress of the Republican Party; and even more at the State/Local level.
The marxist media doesn't show you or most people can't even name the hundreds of normal Republican officials/officeholders; bc the marxist media like the Sunday Talk shows show the RINOs and NeverTrumpers even though they makes up a small % of the Republican Party overall(less than 10%, more like 5%).
Cleaning out the bad apples at the top, is easy to do if fill the precincts up with MAGA DJT/Reagan/Nixon/Ike/etc Republicans.
Got to get involved. Got to put in the elbow grease and clean it up. The power of the party comes from the bottom up; and by having so many vacancies in Precincts, and having a "leadership gap" is what lets the bad apples control too much.
De-registering is 180 degrees wrong.
Giving up ground to the commies and corrupt is not a winning strategy. Marxism is like a zombie-plague, you can run, flee, but it will keep coming for you, your family, your property, your freedoms and liberty.
In the United States of America, and yes (I and family are) American Citizens.
This isn't even close to even the biggest aspects either; it's far worse Gestapo/STASI reality than not having running water; or Covid lockdowns, or Election Integrity Destruction.
It's all about the day-to-day work, the precinct level work. The big names at the top have zero control over the bottom levels; they don't get to keep MAGA people out.
M.A.G.A. as in DJT shortened (for better branding and to trademark) from Ronald Reagan's 1980 Campaign, "Let's Make America Great Again".
"Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the democrats believe every day is April 15." — Ronald Reagan
"The Democrats say that the United States has had its days in the sun, that our nation has passed its zenith. My fellow citizens, I utterly reject that view." — Ronald Reagan
"How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." — Ronald Reagan
Thanks fren. Yes two years now. Commies and Corrupt at water dept still refuse to accept payment and turn the water on (yes this violates all kinds of laws and regs, which is why when they are so brazen and openly violating laws, it shows they have no fear of even the courts or their Executives enforcing the law.)
This is only one aspect. As I've been trying to tell my fellow Pedes for years now; of what is coming and how to stop it. My family is way ahead of where most people are. The Commies and Corrupt to do us, years before they do it to others. And as they now do to others what they did to us, they will ratchet to us to their next levels.
You can study what and how the marxists do what they do. It's all very simple and clear patterns to it. It's not random word changes, just as it's not random propaganda that isn't coordinated.
The way "sucessful leaders of marxism" work, is they take marxism and adapt it to their particular country's traits. Populism was an attempt to mix marxism flavor with democracy to "sell it better". As you can read from the history of the Populist Party in the USA, it wasn't a successful recipe; the recipe then was changed and reworked to become "Progressive ism".
The same goes for all the other "successful" leaders of marxism getting to power. From Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Mussolini, W.Wilson, FDR, Pol Pot, etc.
Each country and leader has to taylor the aspects and parts which fit their times, skills, economics, resources, etc. So like CA Governor Newsom doesn't need to say he wants to nationalize Hollywood or Silicon Valley, because these have already been taken over by marxists; but he does want/need to take over the utilities (eg PG&E).
POPULISM was one of the first and failed attempt at a flavor of marxism in the USA in particular, and it turned mostly into Progressivism (still marxism, still mixed with muh democracy; but a higher ratio of democracy than marxism for the American public's tastes/flavor of pouring it in their ears).
Know the marxists histories better.
The slow down the hole was the Obama years, and others prior. They will have full control, of all the levers of power now... now is when Lefties/Commies go overt rather than covert.
When the Lefties are doing things like kidnapping/torture/noknocks/cutting off utilities; calling everyone in group X as national terrorists; it's not Germany 1932-3 or or USA 1932-3; it's Germany 1938-9. Its not Mao or Stalin 1916, it's Mao/Stalin 1936.
Officer military purges. Law enforcement purges. Utilities cut off (2 years now without running water). Biz districts destroyed (COVID x4). Public programs only for their supporters (as is already in places they control: who gets selectively arrested/charged/prosecuted for criminal activity, Foodstamps, Medicaid, unemployment, etc.)
You may live in a place of normieland, for those of us on the Front Lines vs the Commies and Corrupt for years/decades; they Lefties are in full-speed mode; they've been marching double-time for years now. I warned this years ago.
The Lefties 'big' things are already happening right before your eyes.
We take back California from the Commies & Corrupt, and that's control of the House, Senate, and WH.
There's more Republicans in CA than any other State.
Dem Election Cheating has been going on since 1994 Fight against Prop 187, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_California_Proposition_187 because it would have ended the Dems as a national party. Just as if DJT had 2nd term also with Rep controlled House & Senate, Dems would be done as a national party.
Prop 187 Passed, but Leftie judge tossed it out. Dems have been cheating ever since. They finally stole their Supermajority in Sacramento years ago, and passed more Leftie "laws" like "Forced Districtin"; DMV ID's/Licenses & thus Ballots for illegals, Ballot Harvesting +17 days after Election Day which they used to steal the HOUSE in 2018, 2020, and WH.
We take back California from the Commies & Corrupt.
180 deg wrong. Got to get involved. Got to put in the elbow grease and clean it up. The power of the party comes from the bottom up; and by having so many vacancies in Precincts, and having a "leadership gap" is what lets the bad apples control too much.
That History Channel piece is what is called "propaganda" (& re-writing history), and/or bad sourcing (eg like being "sloppy".) by the writers/producers/creators.
The word populism didn't even exist in Andrew Jackson's time. It's revisionist history. Because Populism also has muh democracy, there's going to be overlap with many "Democrat" platforms before Populism was invented. Since Populism has more overlap with the other marxist platforms, there's going to be Marxist overlap as well.
-
Andrew Jackson famous for fighting the Central Bank, and A.J. for his hard-money policies. The Populists wanted fiat central banking, the exact opposite.
-
Populists want to nationalize industries like the RailRoads back when (or like other industries today; listen to Obama/Biden, or AOC.)
-
Populists want to gungrab and remove armed security eg Pinkertons; where A.J. was the exact opposite in life.
Marxists want to remove barriers to them getting power, so there's going to be some overlap there too. So they like things which accomplish this: taking guns, taking away assembly, taxing away money, puting in limits or restriction on who can run for /hold office beyond minimum requirements, remove the Electoral College, etc.
quick skim of this 2 page pamphlet from the 1892 Populist Party Platform:
https://wwnorton.com/college/history/archive/reader/trial/directory/1890_1914/12_ch22_04.htm
BTW, you might want to reconsider your insults/trolling particularly of me. I've read more books including very old books, the entire US Legal Code, and bookracks upon bookracks of case law, more (particularly non-fiction) books likely than anyone you've ever interacted with online or irl. (One of my grandmothers was a librarian, and a great aunt taught school for 50+ years; my great-grandmother gave most of our private library to a local college/university when it was created to "startup" it's library collection.)
I get it. Richard Nixon got it too. The uniparty is a different problem than the "GOP" or creating a 3rd party.
Do you really think if you waved a magic wand and created a completely 3rd new party, that the uniparty powers wouldn't infiltrate it too.
If you could keep the uniparty out of the new party, then why not just clean them out of the GOP.
From those who have done this kind of cleaning out the corrupt, like myself, as well as making a new 3rd party, like myself. As DJT himself has done flushed out lots of corrupt uniparty people out of the GOP, including Paul Ryan, etc.) it's far less work/time/energy/danger/money/etc to clean it up, than to start from scratch.
Furthermore, DJT knows there's been much more important things to put the time, money, energy into like Saving our Republic.
We'll see how he plays his cards. Until them HOLD THE LINE does not equal bailing out.
-
DJT is not Populist.
-
MAGA is not Populist.
-
TD is not Populist.
-
Populist means marxism + muh democracy.
Take a quick skim of this 2 page pamphlet from the 1892 Populist Party Platform:
https://wwnorton.com/college/history/archive/reader/trial/directory/1890_1914/12_ch22_04.htm
AOC could read this pamphlet today.
-
Things like "nationalizing industries" is NOT DJT/MAGA/Republican/TD.
-
Things like removing private security guards (Free Kyle & Pinkertons and militias) so the Lefties can riot/mob/burn/loot.
-
Things like the "Green new deal" and the printing presses of fiat central banking to pay for it.
-
Things like "graduated income tax" we promise, it's only 1% Tax on millionaires! (That was the promise when Income Tax was passed.) We totally aren't going to have 70-90% Income Tax rates afterwards (they did).
All the information & documents from history, of what and where and who came up with "populism" just as all the other flavors of marixsm (Stalinism, Maoism, Fascism, etc.) are all there to read through, most people of course do not.
Thank you for the comment. You're welcome. If have any particular topics of reading desired, I might be able to help be more specific.
Overall for my general reading suggestions, I recommend start with The Spirit of the Laws, and from there, the Everyman's Library. All these original books are into the public domain, and there's free/pdfs and other file formats available, depending on how you read. There's hard/soft copies of course too, and some newer reprints which aren't in public domain yet.
This wiki pages have links to various archieves and pages with the books, usually in the "External Links" section at the bottom.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spirit_of_the_Laws
as example one of the External Links at the bottom is:
https://archive.org/details/spiritoflaws01montuoft
And can select which file format you want to download the book in.
Commies, STASI, GESTAPO, etc. do not "case closed" on their targets (doesn't matter even with 100% clear evidence of innocence; dragging through the process is enough to punish and ruin most people); once you're on one of their "Lists", you are on one of their lists for life (til death, and even then they put your family/etc on their list too.)
That's the thing. it's not "us first". And it's not DJT/MAGA, etc.
And like all marxism's word tricks and their control of the media & education, the bastardization is not by accident; no differernt then FDR inverting the definition of liberal 180 degrees to hide his flavor or marxism to make it easier to swallow or pour honey into peoples' ears. Same with their words like "Awoman" and "Front Hole"; these are all designed to trick the mind using word roots, vocab definitions, and mask/hide their real intentions behind their new term/redefinition.
- So how many Pedes on the DOM know that Populism was created as marxism + muh democracy?
Vs
- How many Pedes have heard the world on it's own thinking the word root means something like popular?
Vs
*How many Pedes have heard the overt propaganda trying to tie DJT/MAGA into Marxism.
When John Kerry said the other month, "We need a/the Great Reset to stop/fight the rise in Populism"; this is a choice of marxism or marxism, which do you want? It's like asking do you want eggs over-easy or eggs scrambled, it's not asking you if you want eggs or not.
S.B. and others who say that DJT/MAGA is Populism are completely wrong.
DJT has never once described himself or MAGA this way, nor would he. MAGA (Republic over Democracy, free market over marxism, individual liberty over centralized power, restoring rights of individuals vs removing them from everyone/group). MAGA is the opposite end of political spectrum from Populism.
The "rebranding of Populism" came about mid last century, as the commies were taking over the rest of the colleges; and major push on MAGA=POPULISM propaganda came about in these last 5 years for marxists to try to capture/trick some Trump supporters into drinking the marxist-koolaid, including coming of age first time kiddos, (or to recapture those that had drunk their koolaid, like Bern-outs.)
I am a Quaker, the very opposite from a neo-con.
Handshake, You're projecting your spezdit/leftie propaganda namecalling.
Marxism + muh democracy = Populism is what that says.
There is not right wing populism, as there is no right wing fascism.
The polical 'reasoning' around Populism's platforms comes from marxism + muh democracy. It doesn't come from say the Enlightment.
Reading the nonsense written about populism is no different than reading about all the other flavors of marxism: Stalinism, Maoism, PolPotism, Hilterlism, etc. They all come from the same marxist roots, they are all under the marxist umbrella. Arguing about which flavor of icecream on how vanilla is NOT chocolate is NOT strawberry vs neopolitan; ignores and belies the fact that they're all marxism. They get their legal/political power from marxism's "reasoning".
Marxists steal word-roots when creating "new words" to trick most people to do exactly what you've repeated. (Word-root, when they're not inverting definitions of existing words).
is populist because he doesn't strongly learn left or right
Populism doesn't mean the middle of a statisical bell curve, or is Populism in the middle poltiically, it's marxism = Leftie. Plus democracy = mob rule/tyranny of the majority.
With policies aimed at helping the general public.
He's pretty much a moderate.
These statements have nothing to do with Populism, other than using the "muh democracy" part mixed with marxism, to conclude the "good of the majority" etc.
Just because some group of Marxists called themselves populist 100 years ago doesn't change the definition of the general term, populist.
It's really simple. Populism = Marxism + muh democracy; that is how the word was created, that is why the word was created. And like all marxism word tricks, and marxism's re-defining history tricks; this is used to bypass and hid the marxism to pour honey into peoples ears, so they don't realize the marxism is right there in front of them.
"Front Hole". "Awomen". etc. All marxisms vocab tricks are designed to suit their ends, their commietopia goal.
eg FDR redefining "liberal" 180 degrees from its definition, to give cover and virtue to FDRs brand of marxism. Boy = Girl (as in not equality, as in exactly the same.). "Hate crime" (hate can be a motive, but it's not a crime; real crime is crime.)
Andrew Jackson was not a Populist; the term didn't even exist then.
Let's be real:
1.) Biden isn't mentally competent to be lawfully or legally able to take an oath (he can't pass a mental compentency test. No judge can lawfully swear Biden in.)
2.) K.H. isn't even a US Citizen (US v KIM 1898 doesn't apply to her, bc both her foreign parents were here in the USA on Student Visas; and Kim said Perminant Residency (not Temporary) AND had a business neither of which Student Visas do.)
3.) The original Constitution also gave until March; so techincally if the courts want to uphold the orginal Constitution, we could easily straighten this stuff out, all "lawful and peaceful options".
4.) Nancy isn't legit Speaker either; as most of congress (House & Senate) isn't Constitutionally elected atm. Not that the whole line of succession amendment crap is legal either; as it violates the whole framework of the US Constitution and it didn't repeal those parts, so the orignal holds.
The House (and Senate) aren't even legit atm.
By federal law, set with power straight from the US Constitution, their Elections have to be held on Election Day; ie not ballots (cast) days before, not ballots (cast) days after; but only on THE DAY, aka Election Day.
As set by the US Constitution, Article 1, Section 4: Congressional elections, Clause 1:Time, place, and manner of holding:
"The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing [sic] Senators."
2 U.S. Code § 7 - Time of election https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/2/7
The Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November, in every even numbered year, is established as the day for the election, in each of the States and Territories of the United States, of Representatives and Delegates to the Congress commencing on the 3d day of January next thereafter. (R.S. § 25; Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, § 6, 18 Stat. 400; June 5, 1934, ch. 390, § 2, 48 Stat. 879.)
How many congress critters from 2020, (or 2018 and 2016 in the Senate too) won their contests because of ballots before or after Election Day? (Yes, this is not even counting all the "other" frauds/cheating.) Enough that there's not enough legit members atm, just by enforcing these two lines quoted above.
As per the US Constitution, the (Governors/Executives) of each State shall issue writs of Elections to fill vacancies in the empty House seats of their respective State. Of course, Gov Gavin Newsom of CA openly violated/ignored this for nearly all of 2020 re: CA-53rd Congressional District.
So yes we have rather sticky Constitutional problem in the USA; and it's entirely because so many unconstitutional laws have been allowed to build up, because the 3rd Branch of our Government hasn't been doing its job for a LONG time, mostly because of marxist justice written(aka legislating from the bench) ASHWANDER RULES. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashwander_rules
LONG LIVE OUR REPUBLIC!! MAGA On!
...
Great "45" min sermon for these days, Dr David Jeremiah's (starts at 15:50, click the 60 min icon below the video, and then can leap forward starting about 15 mins in)
https://www.davidjeremiah.org/television/weekend?date=2021-01-10
The current week's (rerun) sermon was on Noah, and fighting corruption. Also very good. The sermon series can scroll along left/right on that page.
-Quaker Pede
"Peaceful transition" from 4 Years of President Trump playing epik Defense, to 4 Years of President Trump playing bigly Offense.
You're welcome, and for some extra anti-marxism fun, take a quick skim of this 2 page pamphlet from the 1892 Populist Party Platform:
https://wwnorton.com/college/history/archive/reader/trial/directory/1890_1914/12_ch22_04.htm
As Pres Bill Clinton said best, "Neocons are not new and they are not conservative." They are the Dem interventionists who left the Dem party as the anti-war/anti-draft movement from Vietnam (after getting us into it) started gaining ground in the Dem Party (mostly) in the 1960's. Neo-cons have mostly self-deporting out of the Rep Party; with some more like Liz Cheney needing to be Primaried.
This fall is the Mayors contest. So NOW is the time to take it back!! Or would you rather Andrew Yang bangers reduce it to economic rubble.
Remember, the real votes show we have the votes to win; and the other tools to win. The losing isn't because we lost. If DJT did another 4 years, you betcha we would be fulling taking back NYC mayor's contest.