Is it not really though still around in the developed world?
Unless you consider the Arab world "developed", no.
Just in disguise.
Taxes are equally ancient, and distinct. Same for exploitative labor practices. They're not always pleasant, they're often awful, but they're not slavery and they have no conflict with a libre labor system where ultimately people can for the most part just walk away from an employer. Even contracts that are too personally binding usually don't hold up.
Is funny cuz nobody here would get any support at all attacking some fbi field office.... because it is a retarded thing to do.
Imagine you're a leftoid retard like Ben Dover here, when they attack something...it's always retarded. The local po-leese station, looting the CVS and Foot Locker, burning cars, tearing down old bronzes, smashing windows.
They assume everyone is just going to chimp out like their guys do.
No, you said it was some pop-psych power game, not just "we have them and they're cheaper TCO for unskilled labor than hirelings".
Once mechanization started taking hold the writing was on the wall for slavery, and you still see that pattern today with only primitive cultures that can't do technology still having slaves. Everyone else uses exploitative but libre labor force-amplified by machines because overall it's just a more flexible and efficient system.
If it actually was a power game, it would still be around in the developed world, not just the primitive world.
it didn't matter about all of that, it was about owning and controlling people
This is fucking retarded. It was about labor because mechanization didn't exist yet. Up until mechanization basically every culture had some kind of indentured servitude or slavery. Morality didn't kill slavery, technology did.
I love that my name triggers you.
I just think you're an obsessive weirdo and I will argue about semantics forever because words and meanings matter. In this case, the fallacy is very very old, and the association with communism comes from...a few commentators in the 00s.
Modern systems the video is just a MPEG/MJPEG stream and the DVR is just a stream concentrator that saves streams to a hard drive. What you back that hard drive up to is arbitrary - could be tape in Iron Mountain, could be SAN in your offsite DC cage, could be cloud.
I don't think there are any current gen digital surveillance products that dump direct to tape, hard drive is cheaper and makes a lot more sense when it comes to reviewing footage because it's nonlinear.
How fucking stupid are these people.
Is it really plausible that a billionaire that's been doing business since the 80s doesn't have at least a couple of off site secret stashes no one outside of maybe his wife and eldest son know about, if that?
I mean I'd have several if I were a billionaire.
Data tape is just slow mass storage, so unless you're doing like DR planning it's irrelevant because the data itself is just files like any other, not video encoded onto tape directly; what's going onto the tape is the contents of a hard drive.
Video tape is a whole different beast, even if a similar physical cassette was maybe at one time used for both analog video and data.
Imagine if your kids Favorite Black basketball player snubbed him and a group of white kids to their faces and went straight to a group of black kids right next to them give them auto graphs instead.
I can 100% see LeBron doing this.
Butt baby