Please tell Ronna to stop spamming our inboxes and return the money that was claimed to be an election defense fund donation.

New York and MI had freaking empty emergency hospital set ups that got closed down because of disuse when this was going on. On this topic I find the circle of liberal defense goes: "the hospitals will over flow!!!", "Well, the CDC said you can have a COVID patient in a nursing home!". So funneling them in when there are better places is justified? --enter loop of blaming the CDC/Trump.

Perhaps time for pedes to organize local Nursing home support groups. In my state of MI where they funneled COVID patients in, the News led me to find the nursing homes were hell holes before that. We had an F grade before. Anecdote from the News was the first inspection found a bunch of vomit lying in one of their rooms, then when they did the follow up 1 week later the same vomit was still there. Then there are the stories of elder abuse. Besides trying to do a good deed, it might help for pede groups to get involved in their community...

Democrats are going to put terrorists out of work. All the planning and effort to attempt to fight in any way, meanwhile Democrats do it passively. Honestly, why should they even bother at this point. Maybe the end of terrorism, maybe, until Biden goes back to the Obama propping up of ISIS.

They probably planned, but this isn't a smoking gun. Simplest explanation, the dumb ass didn't know the data or made a typo. More persuasive to me would be how long the document is. Is it longer than it would take their pile of interns to draft in that time frame? Probably.

On a less relevant note, does anyone find it out how incompatible their tweeting behavior is with an emergency? I think in an actual emergency people would be broadcasting basic information, saying to stay safe, rather than giving a narrative of what happened while pushing a highly specific agenda.

This is a good time for signal boosting AOC + spreading memes. Keep her popularity low and don't let it be forgotten by "moderate Dems" (who disliked her before). May not matter much because her base and media shills can cognitive-dissonance their way out of anything, but let's make it hard for them. But holy hell, that got 200k likes?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Thinking about how Reagan was fiercely popular and missed by Republicans after Clinton's terms ended, it led to Bush running on some Reagan nostalgia. Pretending to adhere to his thinking, like all the other RINOs. If they have their way in 2-3 elections from now they'll trot out some fake ass RINO/Bush family member who tries to wink at the Trump base in the same way.

What a sad excuse of a human.

That'd be consistent. But according to another thread that is Hot right now, Biden's EO that raised natural gas prices was linked to energy shortage leading up to this...

I looked it up after your comment. With the info released, it's really hard to evaluate the story. What you described is nearly all of the info they put out, at least that I found. Is it normal to have such little information about that? Doesn't seem normal to me. Then again, the media hardly cared about the recent Nashville bombing.

They put a search for the person in the footage. I could only find a screen shot and not anything about how they came to suspect that person, since the picture is not a great link if taken alone.

I just search and here are the allegations I found. You can search it too but I opened a cuck news source and archive isn't working for Dissenter browser, so not linking here.

1. FBI says they were planted the night before, around 8:30pm. CUck news still links this to "Trump incitement", so now I guess Trump incited a day or more early -- makes total sense. Completely coherent with letting protesters inside. edit: and to add layers to the coherence... the plan was to bomb the site Trump protesters were about to "riot" in. Sounds like a Trump supporter.
2. There's a photo of some masked guy in a hoodie loosely carrying a bag, which you can't see. The bag is pretty small.
3. Said it was found by chance in the RNC around the time people went in. edit2: and again, implying that this should have been detonated when a bunch of MAGA protesters were thought to be breaking in.
4. Says it's unknown why they didn't explode.
5. Allegedly detonated by robots. No information surrounding the damage, no pictures, no forensic information. You'd think there would be curiosity about the nature of it, given the possible threat of poisons or something.

Link to footage? I heard the bomb stories mentioned heavily for about an hour, then it dwindled, and the next day everyone was talking about fire extinguishers. You'd think if that was real and they were still on the look out, that would be a real story. The way they seem unconcerned about pipe bombs, which would be acts of terrorism, really suggests the story fell apart. There was also a weird omission of detail about where exactly they were. Just "headquarters".

And the way they're going after all the grandmas at the rally and their relatives who didn't even go, it's hard to believe they aren't able to find out about these. Especially if they had footage, as you say...

Do it Texas, do it now. It would be both necessary and have epic fallout.

So far has the pipeline EO taken direct effects on the TX power grid?

Really hoping Texans are based enough to take action against this. And I hope that these companies are liable for their failures. I'd hope that when they were awarded contracts they made promises against this happening.

Normally with news like this I'd be saying something like, "this is what happens when you let libs run your state". WTF Texas, please tell me you're immediately going to reverse the dumbass policies that led you here.

Side note about them reportedly prioritizing DFW: incidentally had 3 colleagues near Dallas working remotely. 2 of them said power was out and they couldn't do anything, and 1 who lived nearby them was online and doing video meetings like normal. Not sure how much is legit so it's just a tiny anecdote.

I agree they'd love to. I'm just not able to predict what they will attempt to do. Like, why would they want to help China, exactly? Hard to imagine even a total smooth brain thinking that will be even good for them personally, in the future. Could they just be aholes trying to cash in and hoping the adults will come clean it up for them later?

That's kind of why I'm thinking a chunk of this (regarding China) is due to political corruption and ineptitude. It's very easy to understand why they'd sell this land if they bribed the local officials, or whoever.

Making it completely irrational for them to blame TX outages on being outside the national grid. For anyone making that argument, I'm perplexed at how it's possible to miss something like this.

McConnell needs to go. Just curious about if anyone thinks he did ANYTHING important (say something that would not be done by a generic GOP Senator). In Trump's first term McConnell was always credited for getting Judge appointments through. If true, that's at least something not terrible. But what I can't really evaluate is why McConnell is essential for this process. We really couldn't get them filled without him?

Looks like the start of some great action.

Meanwhile, it would be kind of nice if they prioritized power during the shortage away from their lands. Go on Texas, act based.

Someone in his family or family of an administration member is on the board of the company lobbying for it, or with a company that will be given contracts to manage the resulting access.

I imagine that CA is part of it then, so... Ah well, getting used to people everywhere being able to argue green is red whenever they need to.

It's not easy to imagine what the benefit of this plan is. I've assumed failures on this level are mostly the result of incompetence and corruption (corporate bribes for monopolies and giving special interests favor for regulations). In other words, shortsighted dumbfuckery.

Maybe I'm missing it, but... how do we get from reset where they ban land ownership, to some type of control? As far as I can see, they are a few steps away from that now.

I don't doubt they'd love to take actions that you're alluding to, but is that really the best strategic option from their point of view? I'm having trouble imagining how they handle taking out, locking up + managing, 75+ million. We should always remember that despite how corrupt they are, they're in a compromised position if wanting to take us on as a group. Also, they'd be losing that chunk of the work force, economy, and people in various other positions, would weaken us and bring risks and costs. Then again, I can't imagine what benefit they're getting from being lax on the CCP, like with the topic of this thread. Besides it being a result of targeted political bribes. (If the latter is true, exposing them would be a pretty big shot for us to fire at them).

So with the logistic problem, I'm highly skeptical them trying to directly go at us. Like, the only way I think to bypass the problem would be for them to enslave us and make us factory workers. But, for now, there is no direct path to that. (Let me enter leftard fascist mode and come up with an idea: they declare all Trump supporters terrorists and if you're a good factory worker you'll get out 5 years before your 70, provided you do well in the gulag reeducation).

We'd need some type of unexpected shift, and if they care at all about international risks, there'd need to be major global realignments too? If this thinking is correct, the big question is what is their alternative method for wanting to completely fuck us over?