What the fuck is this? You post that you don't want black people to vote, i.e., say you are doing literally what Dems accuse us of and use as an excuse to prevent voter ID from happening. Not only does that get used against securing the vote, it helps lefties make another smear of this community by pointing to your post.
Who posts about being exactly what libs accuse us of being? Infiltrator? Nice try at sabotage.
Good start, but remember we had laws on the books and then State AGs without legal authority made illegal orders against the legislature. And all the votes got certified after local laws were broken. And all judges were like "so what, yeah it broke the rule, huh I guess so, but no biggie we'll get it next time".
Who does the counting and the system in place for enforcement are the things that matter more.
IDK, we're in an age of cell phones. I remember a handful of times I heard about this. With like 1.7 billion people and paranoia, that might happen by chance. But if there were claims a lot of this occurred, it's suspicious AF.
The only slightly encouraging case I can think of was for the FBI team that was monitoring Flynn and interviewed him, one of the agents wrote into the record that it made no sense, and asked if the purpose was to get him fired or entrap him.
The fact that an agent wrote that and that is not considered news can also extend our view of corruption to the DOJ (even in Trump's term) and press. For another of countless examples.
The thing you referenced is basically something that needs a war to be applied. At that point, it's basically throwing out our legal processes. There's certainly no legal process where citizens or government officials can invoke this and carry out a procedure to institute a new Government.
When people say they want a do-over, it certainly implies to me that they mean having a process followed in the law, not the war that it would require under the part you quoted. That part is basically a reset / nuke button, not exactly a "process".
The present administration is fucking poison, I despise them more than I thought I'd despise anyone. That doesn't alter legal processes. I'm just trying to point out the above.
If it is like the ones I saw, it is probably a bunch of poor dupes thinking genuinely thinking their doing something a bit brave and noble, and they can't imagine it being harmful. Seems that way, but maybe I'm looking for excuses.
Probably speaks to the level of infiltration of FBI SJWs on the lower levels. I assume the garage pull didn't go to the highest office. Wray's still responsible for who he keeps as staff on certain things and setting direction. So... it's worse than just being a Wray problem.
We need to hold people to a standard that, if they're going to judge something, they need to look into the situation and be informed. With Trump, a lot of his benign statements got mutated into something horrible sounding by the media. From that I think we learned that we can't expect to have good optics for people who only listen to the sound bytes.
I get your points, but I have a lot of doubts on whether it's the right strategy (not that I'm promoting what Torba said, either). Look at what happens on the other side, for example. Joe Biden has a track record of getting caught for plagiarizing personal speeches from UK politicians, saying he doesn't want kids to grow up in a racial jungle, and so on. Or the left-fags who say there needs to be more violence in the streets who were given a total pass, like when they post total anti-white racism, or re-education camps for dissenters. The left doesn't care, and they aggressively bullshit their way past any questions a normalfag may have.
Either we can give normalfags a reasonable case about such situations with Torba/others, and they take it in stride, or we never had a chance with them to begin with, I believe. Could be wrong. Maybe you're right about optics. If so, the best response IMO is to amplify better voices. It shouldn't matter to MAGA movement if there are crazy social media accounts of well-known conservatives.
Overturning it doesn't exist unless you mean outside the legal system. There's simply no such thing in the Constitution besides replacing Biden with Harris and then Pelosi. But those can't be triggered by us because we don't have the votes, so it's a pipe dream too.
To be very clear, even if you had the CEO of Dominion and a bunch of poll workers admit they falsified results, there is no legal process affecting the Presidency. They can go to jail, and that is a worthwhile thing to pursue, but even if it was known on both sides, there is no legal process for fixing it after the fact.
We can overturn how elections are run at a local level. Like all the Dem assholes did when Trump was in office.
Came to look for this point. Paying for testimony and false evidence has got to be illegal, though not sure it holds up if they're going to focus on making rumors.
I think they'll ultimately badly lose the trial and want to use it to stir up anger again. "Ohh look at all these testimonies and the white patriarchy let the cops go..."
I kind of agree with hit pieces being far less meaningful to the public (though not enough).
Whether this post by Torba is "proof" to me kind of depends on if he has a legitimate basis for identifying tranny hackers here. If he doesn't, but just got trolled by tranny images or is making a guess, it seems kind of raving mad. To clarify, for myself, I'd just see it as a moment of exaggeration in the moment, for the scenario he misidentified them.
But if it is actually verified that the group is identifiably some tranny hackers who were being assholes on top of committing crimes, I think we can live with someone calling them a demon. I am guessing you're taking it as he is calling all trans people demons, rather than just the hackers. But for this I only saw reference to some demons, not all trans people.
This part is where I flat out disagree with the reasoning. The hit pieces are going to come no matter what. If they lack material for a hit piece, they're going to register accounts and say garbage, then use their own user posts as material for the hit piece.
I kind of feel you. It's not a good look, it feeds into making him the typical sterotypical cartoonish right-winger type, and some people who haven't been red pilled get lost. I personally don't care, even though I find it an odd word choice. It doesn't seem to mean anything more than calling them a bunch of fucktards, just a different guy's lingo.
Hey, 2021, time to be open and let things fall where they may, IMO. When we tried to make tolerant branding it hasn't helped, that I've seen. In general I'd like to see a lot less consideration and capitulation. Those probably move narratives to the left.
Are you referring to anything specific with Anglicans and Presbyterians? Last year I went and found my old childhood Presbyterian church again. Woke messages scrawled everywhere, more social messaging than actual religious content.
It's on the wrong side. Mentally Ill Tranny Demon Slayers.
But the weird thing here is... why would Torba come to know they're trannies. If they're hacking to piss him off, why reveal their own personal info even slightly... Am I missing some backstory here that makes this make sense? I can see someone spamming Torba with that type of material when hacking because they're trying to goad.
I don't see it, but I hope we avoid friendly fire around here. We all would like things like in his post to happen, but don't we all agree that they won't? The things I don't like about hopium are: 1) it can be a method to pull in donations but not really pursue the goal effectively (or at all), and 2) it misdirects people from more productive responses.
Kind of like the problem from when suckers, such as myself, donated to winred when they said they'd support the legal fight for election investigations which were instead sucked up by the RNC, and probably bought Liz Cheney a lot of dinners.
Clear attempt at trying to be a leftist's version of a Trump supporter.
This is completely dumb as well. There were shitloads and shitloads of white people involved in voter fraud. For all we can guess, the amount of black people voting for Trump in Detroit and elsewhere is way higher than got counted.