I think about 5-7 Trillion dollars worth over the last decade and a half.
All the debt could be paid easily, but we got International Griifters in charge so that debt will always being going up till collapse.
To put in perspective Nuclear Reactors(with just the SMR-type) could offset the energy costs by 8 times, and all the cascading avenues of production that would follow would multiply that as welll.
That means squat though so long as those in charge drain more than we can make.
Take Bamboo, Kudzu, and the Hop-hornbeam Tree(Ironwood), and that practically cuts huge costs over large portions of industries(There is Hemp, but the more I learn about Kudzu the more I see it not as good in some areas[growth rate for one]). This leads almost into Trillion dollar digits in a decade span of time.
Then comes some other things like Ultra Deep core mining(Mantle mining to make it short) would produce metals by the ton per second with how concentrated it is that deep. To add to this Space Colonization and Utilization(Mining, manufacturing, etc) is an ever expanding market for Thousands of years just this solar system alone. Head to others then it literally could take millions if not billions of years to expand before even reaching the edge of the galaxy in full.
In essence, We are being held back by $20 Trillion-$25 Trillion every year in total.
Reason for getting rid of the benefits since it encourages a lot of this. It is only one facet, but it is a facet that creates a strong feedback loop.
What you said is another facet for starting/keeping them(or feedback loop) at it.
I think when states start doing benefits for families, and discourages things that break families would help with it being a strong feedback loop.
A strong community that supports the family is going to be the ones that help build strong men and strong women.
Like the neighborhood watch something similar with helping families and single individuals with things like finances(both learning how to spend money and save money), moral support, experience(marriage, kids, wisdom, skills, etc), and just general knowledge. I think in this way it teaches things that were meant to be taught, but are nearly extinct for at least half of America.
Its more about the fact that when you do call them out that you got males(normally married ones in my case) that defend those women instead of actually listening.
The most common thing that was said is "You are not a woman/married so what makes you have the right to say anything to her"(which is normally after the fact that most of them do like to abuse their positions). It has really turned a lot of women off besides the fact that I don't put up with the bull of wanting to manipulate another person. Gotten multiple guys to see that so there is progress, but drastically slow though.
Society that was engineered by the elite over decades. Made it so it is beneficial for one to breed and not have the father around.
Get rid of the benefits of that, and encourage benefits for families will help in correcting the problem.(This is mainly on the states to point out. Federal government does have some role in this make no mistake, but the main culprit is the states themselves)
One is either a woman or a man, but one will never be another. Saying otherwise just means that person has a mental disorder.
Another is that women are better in the home than men for the reason that guys are bred to be tough and toughened up which means that anything other than that will receive that same thing where a soft hand would be preferred. The same is true in reverse as well.
If you want to start talking that way here this goes:
You missed the end part of what I implied(I thought that would have been explicitly obvious with the way I worded it).
I get the expected part. My first comment was about the third sentence.
To be blunt I will use an example:
Why do you vote when you know that the person being voted for will back stab you?
This question uses the same thinking being used so I do not understand that when it involves the kicking out of the children when the children did not violate the policy.
Frankly, if the church decides to pass judgement then it is better to move on in my opinion, but the reason why I am poignant on the children is because the mother is want to send them to public school instead of searching for another outside of it.(This is something that will be going to debate on and on so let's leave that alone unless someone is close to them)
I believe the answer is yes that Biden will support that. From observation any time she refuses a question it means yes, and any time she talks about a subject she has to 'circle' back on means lie.
This is so far at the moment.
It comes down to responsibility. Those that are responsible for themselves tend to work out a lot leading to nice looks. Works for both sides.
Look at most of these women, and you find them working out nearly everyday. Same for guys as well.
It is not a phenomenon when it comes down to basic choices that influence everything else.
It was a false flag, not that you were wrong. The false flag was to enact supreme control. They got to do that the hard way now with the states help. We control the states then that nullifies their authority over that state. It is the reason why they are so gung ho on trying to take Texas at this point(revenge is definitely up there as well).
We do not have the structure in place(meaning actual control). That is our weak point That they did exploit by keeping us busy with everything except on the things that do matter. Controlling the local levels ultimately controls the state level. Control the state level means that their bull can't be enforced.
That is the key. They know that, and are going to use the Dominion machines to ensure it stays that way. Control the state on the local levels ensures those machines can't be used except in 1 or a couple areas which bottle necks them and makes it easier to take down instead of being spread out.
That looks like Necrosis tissue. How in the universe can they not see the fact that its killing them?
I get TDS, Brainwashing, and Social Stigmata, but come on that is something even a TODDLER would know to stop.
EDIT:
Was tired, but the information I put is wrong so disregard it. I am leaving it so anyone that views it will at least know why this edit is here.
If we are talking about who and why I think the answer is more obvious in that OnlyFans, as far as I understand from mentions and summary descriptions, is a pornographic site. It was discovered by Karens(according to article) so that would point out it being either one of the students, one of the Staff, or one of the students' parents. The time line is established as being over a year as well.
Its very possible there was a warning given, but I don't know. Just the kids get screwed regardless now.
And that type of thinking is where they have advantage in. They will create a law that will be retroactive thus he or anyone else has already broken a law regardless of the time.
That was the original point of the commentator before me.
So it is against the person or against the family? Because I have seen many, many things that a school does not have authority to dictate.
In this case the Mother actually does have a case against the school if no laws were broken(Don't get me started on how over used that is, but it is there). If the school is private then they do have the right to expulsion of the children though it makes them look much worse than the mother instead of working something out so the mother stops. It sounds like they just ensured the mother and father continues instead.
From the article they make around $150k/month so this might actually encourage them instead. The school could have tried to work with them if they stopped and went to see a marriage counselor instead of blowing this entire thing up like a news stunt.
I won't argue about the rights or wrongs because we all are not have any authority on that since thought does equate very much to action eventually. Dealing with those thoughts before they become actions require help. Dealing with this privately before it went haywire might have been the discerning action needed.
Oh well what is done is done in the end.
The simple answer is what does the Bible say?
Let's breakdown a couple things:
-
If we gain control on the local level then even those in power would be powerless because those laws are stated by the constitution, and if they make laws that go against the constitution then those laws are illegal regardless of if Congress, Judicial, Legislative, or all three say. The states are the ones that determine it provided under the constitution. So by taking back the local hence the state then by reason of lineage of power the states can declare that law unconstitutional. There is many fail-safes built into the Constitution. Then the fact above that is that the Constitution is given authority by God and not the opposite.
-
The next part is all the things being passed is abuse of power, tyranny of the Oligarchy, and suprapositioning of their edicts(Illegally dictating power as would a king). That nullifies their claim of being in charge no matter what(all that in simple terms is they stole an election through illegal means). Nothing they pass will be a compromise unless you agree with them which inherently goes against what God says(abusing kids, stealing, killing of children and adults, etc to name a few actions already).
The real question that should be asked is are we going to get people that Fear God in those local positions? There is enough people for that, the positions are open for that, and creating a local network to build into a nationwide network will become the thing to counter those that want us to give up. We truly do compromise when we stop.
Yeah. I was extremely tired when I saw this. Thanks for reminding about it.