2
Aambrick 2 points ago +3 / -1

We never did. Those in charge did. Those that we never voted in to be more precise.

12
Aambrick 12 points ago +12 / -0

Too much recording, too much uploads then they can take down, and eventually their means of control will go down because of exodus of their plantations from their sheer amount of stupidity.

The one thing we can't underestimate is human stupidity so it can crop back up.

You know, I just noticed that the upper left part of the comment box spells like Bill.

1
Aambrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know that building a Mass driver to send raw materials to space would cost total $1.5 Trillion-$2.5 Trillion, but that is the overall life time cost. Should be able to build a 6-10 mile one for $150 Billion in a 8 year period with a dedicated power system and source(I prefer the Nuclear Thorium-MSR type, but any Reactor would do the trick since 1-2 GW power source with a 700 MW discharge capacity should get it to the ISS station level[safe side would be 2-4 Gw with 1.2 Gw discharge capacity]).

Vacuuming it, and using a plasma window is very doable right now under $400 Billion. If designed properly should last 30 years. If designed to send a 20 Kg payload every 2 minutes that is about 600 Kg/h(14,400 Kg/day) with an operational period of 4-5 days a week with the other 2 used as inspection days. 907 Kg is the near = to 1 ton so 14,400 Kg would be around 17.5-18 tons weekly. Take down several weeks of the year to do a full inspection and repairs/replacement schedule which could account to 2-3 months. So lets say 30 weeks of operation per year then that would equal to 525-540 tons yearly.

That is only for 1. With the amount suggested that could be upped to 3-4 times so yeah. It has nothing to do with money, engineering, or anything else other than politics.

1
Aambrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about if no in person debate:

"How can my ... opponent be able to lead us through this virus pandemic when he cannot be here with me to debate? We have the best folks here setting the stage with these screen protectors, we are more than 30 feet apart, and we in a sparsely crowded room. So, again, how can my opponent be able to lead us through any of the tough challenges ahead when he can't even make it to a simple debate?"

Something like that for the general public. Still bull, but in this way there is no way to say no without looking extremely weak to everyone.

3
Aambrick 3 points ago +3 / -0

Okay:

  1. Not in a sterile environment.

  2. No sterile gear, gloves, face masks, and head coverings.

  3. No identifiable sterilization liquids, sanitizers, or soap and water.

  4. Are they licensed to even practice?

1
Aambrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Asked in the wrong way. How can the monitored flight path have such a close call?

The flight path has always been monitored. Anything out of the ordinary is not by chance. All flight paths, all car drive paths, and all areas that presidents and candidates are always monitored. What happens is allowed not anything else.

1
Aambrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

So they are providing opportunities to red pill the masses by intervening in BLM riots, defending the American flag, Standing for the Anthem, and Saying the National Pledge of allegiance with In God we trust?

Yeah, they are going with the BLM thing, but their wording includes that stuff as well. If they say otherwise then they just opened themselves to a large lawsuit waiting to happen.

0
Aambrick 0 points ago +0 / -0

Well space even on Mars is much lower gravity than here on earth so guns like the Gatling gun can be wielded and have a 20k ammo backpack in space. The problem is the recoil. Mag boots for metal surfaces, and jetpacks for space.

For swords and bayonets far larger versions can be used so a sword here on earth could literally be a semi-weightless bayonet in space.

5
Aambrick 5 points ago +5 / -0

Those are females that are running away if I go by the screams, but some men sound like that too when they scream so could be either.

Still funny. If you soak the paintballs in stink liquid then it really would be an unusual punishment.

1
Aambrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are thinking in the wrong direction. Investment in Space so that we can mine the Septillions of tons of material on the moon(6% Titanium and 8% Aluminum if I remember correctly) could solve the issue as well. That is not counting on the asteroids which have rarer metals and can be more centralized in mining.

$8 Trillion-$12 Trillion is all it will cost over a 50 year period at the longest. If we build Multiple Mass Drivers specifically only for cargo then we can speed that process up to 10-15 years. 20 tons/daily for one, and if we have 5-10 that is 100-200 tons a day. This is the lowest yield amount since it can be estimated that 20 129 Kg per minute can be done depending on power input and designing. 1 ton is about 907 Kg roughly.

Each Cargo Mass Driver and its related power sources could be $120 Billion a piece. Man power for all could be around $1.5 Trillion. The extra Trillions of dollars are buffers. The next step is building a Hybrid with a space version of a 747 which should cost around $400 Billion, and it should be able to carry 100 people or at least 60.

Building a space Dock in space is the next step which as using the method above can be done in 1 year. 50 times the ISS size with struts spanding so that space ships can be built(thicker ones to build the next space station being 200 times the ISS in the L5 point area using another Space structure like the space dock), and cargo holds(100 feet length by 5 feet diameter)[built in space using the materials shoot up to them] only to hold materials and have 2-4 space ships tug it out there and building a small Mass Driver in the higher orbit of the Van Allen belts to basically shoot the material over to the L5 space station Catcher Net(4000 feet in diameter using mainly wires with hole width being 3 inches in diameter).

The $8 T - $12 T is actually almost double if not Triple the amount needed for a 20-40 year operation. If wanting 40-120 year operation that is the amount that would be needed. the length should be around 2-5 miles at a 60 degree incline with about 2-3 miles being underground and the last parts being up the side of a mountain. There should be around 1200 G of acceleration by the end of it. I would say this can go much longer around 30 miles at a 38 degree slope incline with the same acceleration just going a bit higher in the Atmosphere with the anchor point being the mountain and 2 miles underground so 3 Miles while the rest has to be an active structure. 12 Gw with 4 Gw total capacitor worth is more than enough to satisfy the energy requirements. 100 sm-TMSRs(small modular- Thorium Molten 'Salts' Reactor) of 400 MW should be more than enough to provide several functions with constant power supply, power generation to sell, redundancy on top of the Safety features of the MSRs, and the excessive amount would allow them to have low-medium Stress loads so the overall Lifetime of the structure would be even longer.

That is just my view anyways. The total end part of the money generated by the 20 year mark should be $2 Trillion-$4 Trillion every year and growing after a Mass Driver is built on the moon. That would be around the 15-21 year mark after start of the project. Even then Power Generation can start as early as the 8 year mark of the first Space Habitat. If properly made in size and material could generate 5 Gw per solar Satellite.

9
Aambrick 9 points ago +9 / -0

Easy slogan then:

Mailing ballots is Mailing Virus #UPSWorkersMatter. A vote in Person is a vote for safety.

(It's dumb, but a start.)

0
Aambrick 0 points ago +0 / -0

Yes. Don't really have the skills or time to try, but I thought stuff like this would be more needed for the future. Related to MAGAing/KAGing in my opinion since if this stuff becomes widespread it should shave hundreds of billions off the amount of money we spend on energy, and could use that to help pay the debt off.

Similar to the other one(Shape Memory Alloys) about the new combination superlastic alloy that can be used in a wide variety of Temperatures(-260 C to 200 C range), and if we apply that to say buildings, cars, and electronics then that is high durability(Still need to do more research on them to understand them better.)

0
Aambrick 0 points ago +0 / -0

That's liquid nanite metal. This is a solid shape-'memory' metal when in certain temperatures.

0
Aambrick 0 points ago +0 / -0

https://phys.org/news/2015-05-memory-alloy-bent-million-snaps.html

Here is a older one, but the post is describing one that can be used in more day-to-day applications though it is regulated more toward space since it start to break after the 200 degree C Temperature.

1
Aambrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is only when it is purposefully overcharged and set for a chain reaction. Most fusion will actually dissipate before getting to that stage, and to get to that stage has to be deliberate. It would be no accident if that did happen.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›