0
AceOfTrumps 0 points ago +3 / -3

One of the "da joos" guys... Yeah, that's not what a nomad is

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

> Diversity of race is one thing but diversity of core beliefs is another

Not really. Kind of a big red pill is realizing culture (and therefore core beliefs) stem from people. You can't transplant a foreign group of people into somewhere and expect the culture to remain the same.

-1
AceOfTrumps -1 points ago +2 / -3

I don't think you know what a nomad is & because of which are fundamentally missing the point of the question "who benefits"

3
AceOfTrumps 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wtf for sure, but this is really old news... Definitely pre-impeachment

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

Strictly speaking, I was actually talking about emission... But reflection is a suitable substitute for a layman... Lay persons? Lmao (might want to watch out on the neutered language, it has been at the forefront of psychological warfare against us)

Back to the point, though, the current prediction isn't warming. As a paeudo-proof of that (assuming your disbelief) is that the language has changed from global warming to climate change.


It seems you're arguing in good faith, so I'll give you some pointers: you aren't going to convince many people in this community on the merits of the science... Many of us used to come from a similar mindset to what you have now.

What you have to overcome in the arguments are more or less as follows, in no particular order:

  • why were the previous predictions wrong & because of which why should we trust the same groups new prediction

  • why do the policy proposals to combat said predictions have the opposite effect of what they claim? (E.g.: decimating local business in favor of global business... See shipping freighter pollution & pollution contribution by country)

  • why are the people pushing the narrative always massive hypocrites? (E.g.: claiming receding oceanfront then buying oceanfront property)

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems there's some nuance you're missing as well. Are you aware why it is said atmospheric co2 would increase temps? Is because it reflects light. The original hypothesis was that the net effect would be to cool the temperature before they changed their hypothesis to warming (the assumption being that whatever light made it down to earth would then get trapped)

Now: as both hypotheses have been wrong, they're predicting change... Not warming. There isn't an experiment they run for this, it's all conjecture. So, no, it isn't "a result from physics"

by doubles
1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm 99% sure the math on that derivative calculation doesn't check out

2
AceOfTrumps 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not the person you responded to. Just saying opinion and knowledge are two different things. You're asking about knowledge when they're offering an opinion

11
AceOfTrumps 11 points ago +11 / -0

About the only one I've ever heard about worth mentioning is Mansa Musa... Potentially the wealthiest person to have ever lived, bankrupted Egypt on a pilgrimage to Mecca & paid out the ass for some famous architects to build him a temple... It was made of mud.

I go out of my way often to check into history and whatnot, I assume their cultures didn't put a lot of effort into recording things

22
AceOfTrumps 22 points ago +22 / -0

Didn't SCOTUS rule that POUTIS can't revoke previous EOs when Trump tried doing it with one of Obama's?

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not really his interpretation per se, at least what you're pointing out are common contemplations I've run across in discussions

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

The difference between an atheist and anti-theist is that anti-theists believe theism to be harmful to society. Many atheists recognize a benefit to religion... But yeah, most atheists tend to be anti-theist IME

4
AceOfTrumps 4 points ago +4 / -0

Supposedly there was also some back room dealing after Bush won Florida that prevented contesting the presidential election until recently

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

"emotional abuse"🙄 because feels > reals

"Minimizing (british version), denying, blaming"... Whoever made this doesn't have any friends that lasted longer than a single argument.

2
AceOfTrumps 2 points ago +2 / -0

They had said for months if tdw went down to try td.one td.xyz and others. Allowing the shills and trolls to stumble into a failed page at tdw was a good move

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty to--the-point assessment. Agree for the most part, but don't we're anywhere near the heart... We would be getting a 9/11 level false flag if so

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

He has it absolutely backwards. The "wrong remedies" are the policies they want to implement, they diagnose nothing... Instead they push a media narrative to convince you of the problem they invent to implement their policy

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

> saved by truth of law

Exne on the law part. Jesus is the truth & truth is the way.

> KJV

agree that it's the most accurate scripture... Would I be mistaken in guessing you're baptist?

> Zeus created the universe

You're laughably ignorant on that mythology... Zeus was third/fourth tier deity... There's a reason, though, that so many polytheists recognized electricity to have been there supreme leader in any given pantheon. Perhaps if you approached it with optimism instead of of negativity you would discover pathways to converting atheists to christianity... More succinctly, try figuring out how someone can be right as opposed to saying why they're wrong

> Jesus did not rise from the dead

Mostly, it's important to acknowledge rebirth in general. You can blaspheme the father and the son and be forgiven... The only unforgivable sin is blaspheming the spirit (actual Christ quote)

> works

Most good preachers I know resolve that dispute by saying that with faith works follow... Hand in hand... That will not convert anyone, though, in my experience... To convert it is necessary to describe the necessity of belief, which is easy enough to do it you are honest, introspective, and so inclined

> not saved

While I agree with you for the most part, I would add that if you're waiting for "death" to find out if you've achieved salvation then you never had it. You can know in this life

2
AceOfTrumps 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is a futurama meme... Also, good job OP! had a similar experience myself

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

The passage you're referencing refers to the deity of the Son, not the manifestation of that deity in human form. How else would anyone else have ever been saved prior, otherwise?

Spez: perhaps I should clarify that there is more than one path to understanding and therefore following the Son and would agree that that is the only path

1
AceOfTrumps 1 point ago +1 / -0

Serpent symbolizes eternity/immortality in that culture. Not really interested in trying kundalini.

They say it is really rare for the third eye or crown to open naturally & I had that happen while transitioning from hardcore atheist to christianity... Definitely something you notice. As for all the other chakras they talk about, no idea, but at least some of their religious practices are rooted in fundamental truths & nobody has a a monopoly on truth... + There's more than one path up the mountain (obviously the peak remains the same)

I would consider myself a trinitarian Protestant, but frankly I think Hinduism is closer to the truth than many churches

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›