1
Acefighter66 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you seen what passes for a Libertarian these days?

1
Acefighter66 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just a little weather update.

2
Acefighter66 2 points ago +3 / -1

Fuck you no it isn't.

5
Acefighter66 5 points ago +7 / -2

I aint fastin! I need a full belly to head down to my state capital today with a grill, flag, music, and other pedes to protest.

10
Acefighter66 10 points ago +11 / -1

Just so everyone knows, it'll be in the high 40's all week in DC. Great weather for big puffy jackets. All sorts of room for concealing MAGA dispensers.

2
Acefighter66 2 points ago +3 / -1

He's currently getting reamed on facebook for voting on the "covid" stimulus bill. Shame he was just re-elected on november 3rd and all this is coming out AFTER the election. I really was a fan of Garret for the most part before this.

4
Acefighter66 4 points ago +5 / -1

I know Steve Scalise signed the TX v PA suit. What is he not doing going forward? It's my own congressman Garret Graves that was shockingly the only Republican not to sign. He represents a staunchly conservative district so I and many others are very confused as to why he is not supporting Trump.

2
Acefighter66 2 points ago +2 / -0

Driving a Cuck-mobile of course.

1
Acefighter66 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because we all expected foul play in the election. We had years to fix it and letting it happen again can only be for a purpose. That purpose would require a plan if it were to come to fruition.

9
Acefighter66 9 points ago +9 / -0

Pedes need to realize that under the circumstances, pulling this off couldn't be done without a plan which is all the Q guys have been saying exists since the beginning. We have more in common than we differ on and we all want 4 more years. Let's just treat each other as patriots with different opinions.

4
Acefighter66 4 points ago +4 / -0

You must first reach the shore of the Rubicon before you can cross it. No need to do it yet. I hope he does though when he gets there. Never seen him waver before.

22
Acefighter66 22 points ago +23 / -1

Common rifle calibers.

3
Acefighter66 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd rather agree and admit I was wrong later than doom and be right. No. I'm with you if only because I know what's coming if I'm wrong.

63
Acefighter66 63 points ago +63 / -0

Based! We'll take ya here in Louisiana.

by mmw_21
39
Acefighter66 39 points ago +39 / -0

Updooting if only to help get clarification on the information coming out of WI this morning.

Is the majority opinion of the court that the rule changes were illegal?

Is there any room to issue a remedy?

What's happening!?

1
Acefighter66 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me too. A little confused with what's actually happening with WI.

2
Acefighter66 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait, so was this AFTER they issued the opinion that bypassing photo ID requirement was unconstitutional? So they're saying "It was illegal, but we aren't going to do anything about it."

What are the vote margins in WI again?

2
Acefighter66 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hear ya, I've never been a particularly big fan of Dan, I also agree, if he wants to try and turn a buck off of the conservative exodus from Twitter more power to him. However, I disagree that Ron's concerns are non-starters as having "verified" accounts is a good thing when it's used for the purpose of just being sure the account you're reading is who they claim to be. If such a feature can be bypassed or distorted in order to mislead people to think they're listening to a high profile person and they aren't then that undermines the platform as a whole and Dan isn't addressing this actual claim. I think he should.

4
Acefighter66 4 points ago +4 / -0

Personally I've found Dan's responses here woefully inadequate. I hope TD.Win can figure out what's going on here. I'd hate to find that someones just grifting for money.

5
Acefighter66 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe so, however Ron's calling out the integrity of Parler, which Dan has thrown his name behind. This is not good for Parler and Dan is not addressing the serious and verifiable concerns? If there are "verified" accounts for Ron and James Woods on Parler and both say they've never made an account then that undermines the whole thing. If they're perhaps putting on a show then that's one thing but Dan isn't looking good here.

3
Acefighter66 3 points ago +3 / -0

We should just oust their government and ask the citizens new representation if they would like territory status

1
Acefighter66 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where does this certainty come from about specifically tomorrow morning? I know that the scotus requires a response from the defendants but there could be more avenues after that and there are more processes to cover.

view more: Next ›