3
AdamBomb 3 points ago +3 / -0

No work - This Fall!

No baling hay at all!

2
AdamBomb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now that patriot can finally rest in the land that made him so great. Prayers and peace to you and your family pede. Chin up and keep his legacy alive!

7
AdamBomb 7 points ago +7 / -0

RINOs and Democrats

FTFY

5
AdamBomb 5 points ago +5 / -0

Primaries. Our job is to fix the Republican party through the primary process. Trump has got the security of the nation in control now. Just look at the recent cabinet restructuring.

6
AdamBomb 6 points ago +6 / -0

Tell that to Bill Clinton in the '92 presidential election. He LOVED Ross Perot.

21
AdamBomb 21 points ago +21 / -0

I prefer the method that involves winning. Take over a party (Republican party) - you know, what Trump has made serious strides in doing for the past 4 years.

There will be massive numbers of uninformed R and D voters for at least the next 4-5 election cycles. They will always vote by party. The first one to split loses a major portion of the voters (a portion of the informed ones) and will lose for a long time. This will effectively give the communist Democrats power forever if you split the vote on the right because they will continue to rig the system against their primary competition (Republicans that aren't in the Good 'ol boys uni-party club) and third parties until America no longer exists.

The only working solution is to do as stated above and restore the Republican party to its original constitutional and patriotic roots. The uninformed won't know the difference but they sadly number in the tens of millions and losing a 5 million or so informed strategic flunkies from taking over the Republican party = Democrats till we pay our lively respects to Xi Jinping for our work at Foxcon in a re-education camp.

No Republican takeover - no more America.

1
AdamBomb 1 point ago +1 / -0

This Damn psyop needs to end. Trump has his party and it's the one he's stealing from the Neocons, the Republican party. GTFOH with this crap.

Split = Communism because D's at large will always vote blue no matter who and many R's will do the same for the red candidate. Take over the R's so those retardicans that only vote straight ticket still vote for good candidates regardless of the fact that they have no idea what they're doing. Split the right wing with a new party and only uninformed MSM shill Dems majority vote will win putting the uniparty back in power... but literally only the Democrat wing of the uniparty so literally one party governance rather than the previous two party facade.

But no, ignore everything I just said and go with a new party because of lions or something... /s

1
AdamBomb 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they live in China doesn't that mean they are no longer a Georgia resident? That's literally the heart of the ~20,000 CoA voter fraud number Matt Braynard quoted.

1
AdamBomb 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd be supportive of the "LiOn PaRtY" only if the D's split and the R's still can't get themselves together by the next mid-term cycle.

2
AdamBomb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. There will always be straight ticket R's just like straight ticket D's. We lose the huge straight R's because we want a dang lion for a mascot and we're out forever. Splitting the party is straight up retarded ESPECIALLY since Trump has done a ton of work transforming the Republicans into the American party we desire. Lots of RINOs, but they're endangered and outed themselves (soon to be extinct now). D's win until we become a Chinese territory if the ticket splits.

3
AdamBomb 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't understand how so many people here don't get this. It boggles the mind. Trump has already made so much ground taking over the party that the Republican leadership is left hanging on with the last of their grip and they have exposed themselves through "settling for Biden" and remaining silent. We have the party by the balls, and yet they want to blow-up all the progress Trump has made because... lions... or something.

1
AdamBomb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't forget to add my senator "Bill Cassidy - LA" to that list.

3
AdamBomb 3 points ago +4 / -1

The point of this post is to troll. It's supposed to piss off everyone. That's why it's funny.

2
AdamBomb 2 points ago +2 / -0

He experiences rage because he knows no one wants to see him. Ever.

2
AdamBomb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here is my current perception:

Revise 230 - oh hell yeah!

terminate 230 - NOOOO!

Unless there is another form of legislation that can be put in place to protect the internet from out-of-control predatory licensing attacks and other protections for sites from the posts their users contribute, then some aspects of section 230 must remain.

I am not terribly well versed in law so It would be nice to hear back from someone that likely knows more about this than I do.

EDIT:

Alternatively this could just be GEOTUS pulling some 5d chess and I may be missing the point of his tweet. Maybe he's just trying to bring attention to section 230 because of how broken it is in its current state. Maybe trying to get people to start thinking about it in this respect by bringing more people into the fold about the legislation. Probably using his "miss-spellings" or other tricks like seemingly extreme statements to garnish attention about an issue that would otherwise be missed.

1
AdamBomb 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's all about six sigma. You may never achieve perfection, but at some point it just doesn't matter because the problem is too insignificant to require any more devotion of resources.

This is a good primer: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/six-sigma.asp

EDIT: To be clear I absolutely 100% agree that the voting system is stupidly broken right now. I'm just stating that it may never be perfect but certainly can be made good enough to prevent large scale coordinated cheating. Also most small scale cheating as well can be eliminated with proper address recognition (system sees multiple similar repeating address or post office addresses with "suites" in place of PO box numbers - flagged for audit) and recorded ballot counting. I just don't believe in voting secrecy after their vote has been submitted.

3
AdamBomb 3 points ago +3 / -0

I may be too young to understand. What is an Edsel?

1
AdamBomb 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's likely not a traitor because he's likely a plant, not a turn-coat. All the FAUX News hosts (maybe not Hannity, but he's unbearable anyways so whatever) are controlled opposition.

1
AdamBomb 1 point ago +1 / -0

We can't forget the 2 in 25 because it signifies 2 terms! Even better than the 5th from V for Vendetta. Jeeze, real life keeps getting more and more like that movie...

2
AdamBomb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hell no! There'd be write-ins for AOC, Bernie, and/or frickin Xi Xenping to some degree. I'd even expect some to write in their own name.

Only way to increase your odds of 900/900 for one candidate is if you select the voters ahead of time and only select voters that say they will vote Biden. Even then it's likely a hand full will lie and break such that ~99.5% or so vote Biden. Only a really deep selection process (and maybe not even then) could you select a population expected to vote Biden and come close to consistently receiving a 100% Biden vote.

That all said, it is entirely possible at 5:30 am the next morning that you'll obsever a count of 135,900/900 of the voters end up voting Biden. You're gonna have to trust me on that it totally can happen.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›