3
AgentGTO 3 points ago +4 / -1

Well unfortunately with his track record, it's not like what he says carries a lot of weight so why bother going to court over something that was said by a nobody?

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well that's an easy question. NOTHING! because they'll never get back in the majority and if they somehow do, they don't have balls to do anything like that.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see the editor pulled a Brian Stelter on this video.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. It sickens me that we're being pushed to start considering actions based on race instead of on character/actions.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

This type of behavior is completely unreasonable. "Whoops, sorry, looks like this law actually was illegal and, sure, maybe it screwed you guys over that we didn't look at this 3 months ago but we promise to be on top of this for the next election". The flagrant disregard for any type of really election integrity is vomit inducing. These people should be thrown out and never allowed to hold a federal job again.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, gummy bears? I never got that memo. Oh man, I've been stockpiling bottle caps for nothing?

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think that plan would work as well as he thinks because when the communist culture comes crashing down, it'll mostly likely come crashing down on top of whatever you built, destroying it.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should just print out a large middle finger and send it back.

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not unless Kamala pushes him down the stair 1st.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it's because the system is so rotten to it's core that the only way to "fix" it would be through "dictatorial" means & he would become the Julius Caesar of the US and he probably didn't want to go down that road. The "election" of 2020 has made it pretty clear that the legal avenue is only for special people, so when you don't have the support of the military (meaning the generals & higher ups, not the troops themselves), you have a dishonest, scummy media that will twist and lie about everything you do, what else can 1 man do?

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

She was pretty much saying that your standards go out the window when locked up and you'll resort to begging for food and water and laughed about it. Pretty fucked up, don't have much sympathy for those locked up but if they aren't causing problems, at least treat them like a person until they give you a reason not too.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well to be fair here, he was 86 years old and average life expectancy rate for black males in this country is 75, so he beat the average by 11 years.

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holy shit. Thanks for this. I knew that there was some abuse of science going on around April to May, I didn't know what the abuse was but the red flag to me was that anyone who questioned the current procedures was immediately attacked and suppressed, which confused me because that's exactly what you need to do when faced, again at the time, with an unprecedented virus that we knew nothing about.

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm a pede that doesn't know anything about PMCR testing. What amplification were they testing at?

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone know if Twatter says it doesn't violate TOS is because of how they interpret their TOS or because they don't actually have anything in their TOS to prevent crap like this?

I don't even know which is worse.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +2 / -1

Does this even matter at this point? The results won't change, the Republicans won't do anything about it and the media will most likely shelve it. If anything, this should be used to find those that are now, all of the sudden, interested in investigating election fraud and work to kick them out of office.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just wow, they're not even trying to hide it because they know they can get away with it. Unbelievable.

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I've been seeing, that the election was a blowback back on Trump. I could agree with that if it wasn't for all of the underlying evidence. Trump managed to beat precedents by passing markers of past Republican winners. Biden also beat precedents but he did so by falling short of all most all the markers of past Democrat winners.

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair to the guy, he's kinda forced to lay low because of the YUGE hit job the media and the Democrats unleashed during his confirmation. He seems like a decent guy and I didn't get a "swampy" vibe from him, that usually comes from the slimier members and Kavanaugh is pretty milk toast. Time will tell but hopefully he remembers the treatment he got when they try to make the SC write "new laws".

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmmmm, I don't think that's his hand writing and I don't think Trump likes to use commas to the top, saves time to skip it. :p

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›