1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well the appropriate response is to give those police officers those, specific, three guns and tell them to have a good day. Then you pull out the guns they don't know about and make plans to leave the country. :p

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crazy but not surprising. The victim and perps are the wrong color, therefore the media doesn't see a story.

6
AgentGTO 6 points ago +6 / -0

The military brass can go screw themselves. Trump was on their side but they couldn't stand having to take orders from him and actively worked to ignore or undermine his efforts. They can take their crying buckets and piss off down the road.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I hate that they're so distrustful," Palmeri said.

LOL, kind of sad and not surprising how these people don't realize that they just nuked what little credibility they had left over the last 4 years.

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is pretty much irrelevant. Even if by a miracle it were to pass the House and Senate, it would still require 3/4ths of the states to ratify it. The real threat to the EC is them pushing the national vote mandate where states will give their EC votes to the winner of the national popular vote, that is far more of a danger because it's pretty much a way to bypass the EC all together and the feds could bully states into accepting this change or lose federal funding.

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok, I think I'm starting to understand it. So from the stock owner's perspective, who is playing the long game or using the interest, you loan HF 1000 shares of AMZN, HF sells shares, AMZN price goes down, HF buys 1000 shares and returns it to the stock owner. So the stock owner is no better or worse off because even if he didn't loan out the shares, he still would have lost value due to price drop. Am I getting that? Also, appreciate the explanation for this stonk illiterate pede.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well to be fair, what Shapiro said is true. The stock market is not a casino. The problem is that we have people that are playing by a different set of rules than the rest of us and the "prank" is pretty much calling out the ones who have abused the system in the past and making them pay for their bad decisions.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

I still don't understand it. Wouldn't it be more like borrowing a fren's car then driving 150,000 miles on it and trashing when you return the car? If I'm understanding what you're saying, is you're borrowing something worth X, selling it, then buying it back at a cheaper price and giving it back but not worth less than X?

3
AgentGTO 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol, let that be a lesson to not think that AOC will be cool for a second again. Just because she gets 1 or 2 things right every other year, doesn't mean that she won't still send you off to the gulags for wrong think.

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is fucking outrageous. You can't simply save your money because inflation eats away at over the course of 30 - 40 years. Can't make more money because they allow countries like China to take advantage of our trade policies and ship jobs overseas while at the same time importing low skilled works by the millions. Now they want to shove any regular person out of the market by taxing unrealized gains. As a small time investor, and when I say small time I'm playing with a couple thousand $, I'd have to pull my money out because I couldn't afford to pay taxes on money I haven't even earned.

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

This pede here lives under a rock most of the time. What's this about pro-AOC propaganda? I mean I understand she made a statement about what's happening to the WSB crowd but just because she gets 1 thing correct doesn't mean she wouldn't shive you in back the moment it's convenient. Are there people saying otherwise?

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

No it's not funny.

It's fucking hilarious!

3
AgentGTO 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mother F-, it's an issue with how the comment is saved it's not saving 2 underscores. There should be an underscore right before and right after "nhadmissionreadmissions", everything else stays the same.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hold on, can we go through with step 5 without violating the Geneva Convention?

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's funny is this guy actually did a public service. Anyone stupid enough, which would only be about 4,900 people according to their indictment, to believe the memes this guy put forth, that you can vote by text, doesn't deserve to vote.

3
AgentGTO 3 points ago +4 / -1

Well unfortunately with his track record, it's not like what he says carries a lot of weight so why bother going to court over something that was said by a nobody?

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well that's an easy question. NOTHING! because they'll never get back in the majority and if they somehow do, they don't have balls to do anything like that.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see the editor pulled a Brian Stelter on this video.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. It sickens me that we're being pushed to start considering actions based on race instead of on character/actions.

1
AgentGTO 1 point ago +1 / -0

This type of behavior is completely unreasonable. "Whoops, sorry, looks like this law actually was illegal and, sure, maybe it screwed you guys over that we didn't look at this 3 months ago but we promise to be on top of this for the next election". The flagrant disregard for any type of really election integrity is vomit inducing. These people should be thrown out and never allowed to hold a federal job again.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›