1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Funny how the people that don't believe in land as property are perfectly fine with native Americans claiming 1000s of square miles of wilderness as solely theirs.

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Finally" huh? I guess they've been waiting for this and it was delayed.

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are trying to normalize this shit. But everybody, even them, know it's not normal. They are trying to break people. Force them to believe in a lie, e.g. 2+2=5. Once a person submits their own capacity to reason to an outside authority, they're automatons under control.

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +1 / -0

They were completely taken over by radical socialists in the 1980-90s. Quite deliberately. By the 2010's they are deeply entrench and run the administrations too. They are just woke socialist factories at this point. That said, there are still some good schools, programs, and professors out there. Even if we start trying to fix this tomorrow, it will take decades to regain even a semblance of balance.

4
AlFreeman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Here is a link to the original Real Time News article for posterity: https://archive.ph/SuTTz (It's in Hebrew)

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The solution seems simple enough. Lie. Why play fair in an unfair system? If she wants to identify as a binary fluid half cherokee black woman they can't contest it. That's the new rules, right?

2
AlFreeman 2 points ago +2 / -0

1936 ceremony for the launch of a ship. Hitler himself was there. The man is August Landmesser. His wife was jewish. It doesn't end well.

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a monopolized system this is the case. In a free market system, the people not getting what they paid for (a cure) would go to the competition.

0
AlFreeman 0 points ago +1 / -1

They just watched him commit a crime and knew he had committed previous burglaries in the area. They didn't suspect him, they saw him do it.

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +2 / -1

Libertarians have their own LINOs to deal with. Don't write off the philosophy America was founded on because some woketard checkmark on twitter is really an authoritarian.

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +2 / -1

More specifically, they believe there is a rogue group of good guys operating within a pedo/satanic government to fix it and that a covert war is going on behind the scenes. They see Durham as proof of the plan still unfolding. I don't buy it, but it's not as simple as trust the government and vote harder. I don't see the need to denigrate them like the media does. If trusting the plan makes them inactive, what is everyone else's excuse?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +2 / -1

We have the right to apprehend a criminal. Especially when we see them fleeing our neighbors property, we know for a fact they are a burglar, and we know the police will arrive to late to do jack shit.

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +2 / -1

You sound like peasants. We all have the same rights cops do. We can chase a criminal and if that criminal tries to take our loaded gun and use it on us we can defend ourselves. Just like cops when somebody goes for their gun. This guy had robbed that neighborhood before and the cops didn't catch or stop him. I guess we're just suppose to bend over and take it.

8
AlFreeman 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah, the guy holding the camera was totally a racist murderer. Not a kangaroo court at all with BLM threatening to burn cities and the entire media lying about the circumstances for a year.

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +2 / -1

They witnessed him leaving property that wasn't his. Whether it was trespassing or burglary, it was a crime because they already knew he'd rob that neighborhood before. They knew him and he knew them.

3
AlFreeman 3 points ago +3 / -0

He had already robbed the neighborhood multiple times and the police didn't catch him or stop him. The idea that only police have the right to pursue a criminal is peasant thinking. Police have no more rights than any man.

4
AlFreeman 4 points ago +4 / -0

People keep saying he was trapped. As if the road had solid walls on each side of it. He could totally have went off road and they couldn't have followed except on foot. A sane person would have done that, but he wasn't right in the head.

22
AlFreeman 22 points ago +25 / -3

That video clearly shows Arbery cover about 50ft of ground to get his hands on the gun and try to wrestle it away from a guy who wasn't even aiming it at him. Apparently that doesn't matter.

7
AlFreeman 7 points ago +9 / -2

Imagine thinking only cops have the right to pursue a criminal. If this guy tried to wrestle a gun away from a cop and got shot, it wouldn't even be news. He knew why they were chasing him. He knew the guy was a ex-cop. They had history.

3
AlFreeman 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's history so bad they can't even whitewash it, so they have to just delete the whole thing. They love their memory holes.

5
AlFreeman 5 points ago +6 / -1

They want us fighting each other instead of them. We are obviously not in a fucking race war. And going along with the propaganda defaming us doesn't sound like a winning strategy to me.

4
AlFreeman 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is 2021 America, you can't just build a hospital and help people. This is the most regulated industry on the planet. You pretty much need the permission of existing hospitals, who sit on the government regulatory boards, to build a new one. Otherwise there would be hospitals on every corner chasing that $100 for two aspirin markup.

3
AlFreeman 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was a hopium loop. He acted like he had inside info, but was just following internet chatter like us.

view more: Next ›