2
AlohaSnackbar 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is REALLY close to the balancing act that the SC is facing. They know full well that if they step in for Trump that the curtain gets raised on the shenanigans and there is one HELL of a butcher's bill to pay on that.

In the alternative, if they step in for Biden to "hide" the steal, or just decline outright, there's 70+ MILLION americans who saw the crime happen in broad daylight. Worse, the Dems were crazy blatant about it, and extreme to the point where there could be no rational reason to believe voting would ever work in the future. Shit, if they could do this to a sitting president, what chance does literally anyone else have?

And you are correct, the response from the "sides" will play deep into the decision. History shows what the leftists will do. REEEESISTZ and riots and burn, loot, murder. BUT, common sense says that those on the right will have learned a lesson. VIOLENCE gets you what you want.

Take 70 million Trump voters. Say 10% of those are die-hard believers. that's 7 million. Say 10% of those are crazy/angry/pissed. That's 700k! Now, take 10% of those and suppose they are angry enough to commit crime, because hey, it worked for the left. That's 70k! Now take 10% of THEM, and say that they are REALLY FUCKING PISSED and think that it's killed or be killed. Now we're at 7k! From those 7k, we'll deduct 50% for not having a y chromosome. Now we're at 3,500 really pissed off, threatened, wronged men who think doing nothing is worse than doing "something"

3,500? All it takes is one guy with a uhaul and $2,000 worth of ANFO and we're up a very real shit creek.

That is what worries me. And it should worry the shit out of the leftists too. A little graft is expected, but MILLIONS of swung votes? That's too far, and pendulums ALWAYS swing back, hard.

*Note: I am not advocating violence. Far from it, I am warning that the conditions the leftists have created will lead to violence, and I would very much like to avoid it.

1
AlohaSnackbar 1 point ago +2 / -1

I prefer armored "killdozers" of justice.

5
AlohaSnackbar 5 points ago +5 / -0

because I am somewhat skeptical that people WOULD VOTE TO BE SLAVES

No need to be. Just look at the cucks begging for more lockdowns and tsk tsking every day Americans for wanting to attend turkey funerals.

7
AlohaSnackbar 7 points ago +7 / -0

On the (off) topic of australia, don't sleep on the series "me inbetween". It's very, very good. And, don't skip to it, because everything else is great too, but there's an episode in season 2 that is probably the best 30 minutes in tv history (or at least tied).

1
AlohaSnackbar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Immediately announce cancellation of all debt to that shithole and watch them collapse.

Of the things we can do, that's somewhere after sending guided missiles to every chinese elementary school during school hours. That is to say, we can't do it.

The power of the US as the world's reserve currency isn't just based on the "petro dollar", but on America's commitment to always paying her debts. A habit that dates back to the revolutionary war, where even after winning, the US paid debts owed to England.

8
AlohaSnackbar 8 points ago +8 / -0

"we should be evil too"

Some of us, yes, sadly. There's some grim work ahead, and not all of it will be pretty, or at this point legal/ethical/moral. The alternative of losing to these despotic cunts is far, far worse though. It's certainly a tough balance, our founders pulled it off, I have high hopes that we can too. But I am in agreement that we need to keep vigilant.

10
AlohaSnackbar 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yup, and we can all say " it sure is a crying shame the democratic machine disenfranchised all those minority voters by ruining their ballots".

1
AlohaSnackbar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, the good news is that no one is better at war than white guys. Just look at the stats. White guys win them all.

2
AlohaSnackbar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because they always are... masters of the universe, don’t you know?

Absolute bullshit! Prince adam, cringer, and man-at-arms are in no way associated with the bullshit "news". Skeleton, maybe. I'm pretty sure he's the speaker of the house.

10
AlohaSnackbar 10 points ago +10 / -0

Multiple deadlines set by SOS, only one set by legislature. This first domino is pointing out SOS couldn't create deadline "x". We could give two shits about this, EXCEPT, the same SOS also created deadline "y" using the same (now ruled non-existent) authority. THAT is where the big number swings, because both "x" and "y" are after when the legislature set the date/time.

6
AlohaSnackbar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thurs/Fri last week he was using tough "no place for quitters here" language while basically conceding in how he framed everything. MONDAY of this week, he was back on the Trump train, Tuesday slightly less so, but still generally on the offence. Yesterday he was back to 60/40 all hail Biden.

We'll see today, but I suspect it'll be more doom and gloom buried behind more false rhetoric.

4
AlohaSnackbar 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't know. I feel like I couldn't be (successfully) ordered to stand down while a 6 year old was being raped 10 feet away.

Everything else is just a matter of degree

1
AlohaSnackbar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, and a hundred years or so before that, 6000 dudes were crucified for all having the same name.

5
AlohaSnackbar 5 points ago +5 / -0

The uspis is the oldest federal law enforcement agency. Just a nugget of info for how long and deep this problem goes.

3
AlohaSnackbar 3 points ago +3 / -0

As a follower of Jesus, you should beware false prophets, and the lake of hellfire they'll lead you to.

14
AlohaSnackbar 14 points ago +21 / -7

This guy has been solid before.

Yes, he has.

He made big bucks with the school kid case

I would hope that's true, but everything I've seen suggests the settlements were nowhere near the ask. Low 7 figure, which while A LOT of money, isn't terribly much considering what occurred.

and others and he’s good.

He's being sued by his own law partners and others. It is possible this is just lawfare against an effective Trump supporter, BUT, the specificity of the allegations suggests that Line is indeed losing his marbles.

don’t really think he’s someone that would make this up.

He's allegedly hearing the voice of God. I wouldn't say "making shit up" so much as can't separate reality from hallucination.

All that said, there's a METRIC SHIT TON of fraud in this election, focused on 5-6 states that is of an unignorable level. The fallout as it gets revealed, or worse, the fallout as it gets hidden will be historic.

8
AlohaSnackbar 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bad times lead to hard men.

Hard men lead to good times

Good times lead to soft men.

Soft men lead to bad times.

Rinse/repeat. But NOW we're in a world where technology can be used for near total control. We literally can not have a "bad time". It will be our last.

8
AlohaSnackbar 8 points ago +10 / -2

I agree, so long as we carefully define "drunk". As it turns out brethalizers are borderline pseudoscience at determine "true" BAC, a number which itself isn't a great guage of impairment. Worse, the "limits" were arrived at in many cases through the thorough science of calling up MADD and asking for their recommendations.

I just want to know if someone is actually impaired, and if they are, fuck'em. If they're not?.... We got bigger fish to fry.

7
AlohaSnackbar 7 points ago +7 / -0

That is pretty legitimate. Engineering programs are some of the few places in modern universities where logic and reason still prevails

There's a bridge in Florida that would dispute whether or not logic and reason is "prevailing".

1
AlohaSnackbar 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's sad that thegatewaypundit has earned a "we'll need to verify" label from us. Hopefully they clean up their act and focus on the truth so we can all trust them again.

1
AlohaSnackbar 1 point ago +1 / -0

They could win without cheating if they'd do a little self-reflection and start pushing policies that appeal to average Americans.

Ironically, they wouldn't even have to win at that point. Trump wouldn't have to run, the country would be on the right path.

1
AlohaSnackbar 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said that such claims are unsupported.

Well, as long as he did that repeatedly when Russiagate and/or the Ukrainegate came up.

what?

he didn't?

Well, fuck him sideways and call him cum dumpster.

9
AlohaSnackbar 9 points ago +9 / -0

If you have a link to the play by play from a trump adviser, I'd like to review it. I'm curious how it lines up with Barnes' take, and my own.

5
AlohaSnackbar 5 points ago +6 / -1

A vote fraud expert used a live (and by definition inaccurate) running vote tally during a hectic night to "prove" vote fraud? I'm more skeptical of this expert than I am of JOE, and that fucker is as twisted as they come.

We're presumably fighting for the same thing. My suggestion is simply to not post hopes on an unofficial running tally that could be explained away with " Our data guy had two columns, one for Trump, and one for biden. He put the number for Biden in the wrong spot, and corrected it once discovered".

-The End.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›