2
Am_I_a_Coward 2 points ago +2 / -0

Worlds. If 1950-1955 had been handled better, we would have had American cities on the Moon and Mars by now. We would be calling ourselves instead the "USA" now, which of course stands for "Unconquerable Space Armada".

2
Am_I_a_Coward 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, you can't make an omelet without breaking a few Ukranians...

2
Am_I_a_Coward 2 points ago +2 / -0

General Macarthur tried to have us invade them immediately following the surrender of Japan. We would have crushed the Maoists with our nuclear weapons, which were not yet banned by treaty. He was turned down.

2
Am_I_a_Coward 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Ilha Formosa", Beautiful Island. Per Wikipedia the all-knowing. A lovely phrase.

What grinds my gears is that, without American aid and our famous Flying Tigers, the Chinese Communist Party would have lost to the Japs easily. Some "allies" they turned out to be. Didn't take them long to forget about that little favor, did it?

3
Am_I_a_Coward 3 points ago +3 / -0

With regards to evil totalitarian planned economies, I consider all of the Axis powers from WWII, North Korea, Cuba, and the Soviets to be or to have been "real" countries. Communism is dumb, but one can still compare which countries did it better or worse. If the country operates as a going concern, not continually on the verge of total collapse, it can be said to be a competently-implemented, real country, which might be evil or good.

Ignoring Italy (as one does), Germany, Japan, and the Soviets all made significant, independent contributions to the arts and the sciences while providing mostly from their own lands a relatively high level of technological modernity and standard of living for their citizens. North Korea and Cuba have not contributed to human progress, but they do have relatively good modernity and they are self-sufficient like the others above were. All of the above except Cuba have or used to have impressive and disciplined militaries.

The Chinese are not self-sufficient. They have to cheat and steal from everyone to feed their out of control population. Their military is entirely made up of underfed, cowardly midgets. All of the stuff they make is flimsy, shit garbage. The Soviet stuff was, at minimum, highly durable shit garbage. Unlike the above "real" countries, which are or were ongoing concerns without indications of impending collapse (the sudden collapse of the Soviet Union was a surprise to basically everyone, and being defeated in war is not an internal type of collapse), China, Venezuela, and all the other fake, pretend Communist countries existing today are temporary and ephemeral in nature, fragile and fake like a hollow plastic Chinese broomstick.

The Soviets nearly put a base on the Moon in the 60's. If they had collapsed 20 years later, they could have colonized Mars by the time Obama first ran for office. Mao does not rest perfectly preserved in a transparent coffin-shrine like Lenin. Lenin's revolution had a core of truth and merit inside it, unlike the Maoists.
China is nothing compared to the glorious tragedy which was the Soviet Union.

2
Am_I_a_Coward 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bing definition 2:

"(of a substance or thing) not imitation or artificial; genuine." (as in real gold jewelry vs. gold-plated or gold-tone jewelry)

"China" is not a real country. China is a cheap plastic Chinese knock-off of a country. They're just an inferior, fake copy of the Soviet Union.

4
Am_I_a_Coward 4 points ago +4 / -0

They could be Japanese or Korean... You know, our allies, whose soldiers are an even match for our soldiers man for man, who always integrate perfectly into our society when they move here...

Oh, and the Koreans have more Christians per capita than most of America. So there's that as well.

7
Am_I_a_Coward 7 points ago +7 / -0

I approve. Anyone who falls for this deserves to be removed from the gene pool.

3
Am_I_a_Coward 3 points ago +3 / -0

China is not a real country.

11
Am_I_a_Coward 11 points ago +12 / -1

We should colonize Vancouver Island and set up a government in exile there.

4
Am_I_a_Coward 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wrong. You forgot to include the mainland portion of Taiwan, which is most of its land area.

3
Am_I_a_Coward 3 points ago +3 / -0

Group blame for group problems is perfectly legitimate. A more statistically accurate way of saying the above is "individual blacks are 360% more violent on average than individuals from any other racial category".

4
Am_I_a_Coward 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hey, "non-purpose flour" is pretty good. I like that one.

1
Am_I_a_Coward 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. Mass enslavement by racial category is a uniquely New World problem. Old World slavery just made use of whoever was conveniently available, usually from a nearby tribe or nation with the same overall skin color and facial features.

2
Am_I_a_Coward 2 points ago +2 / -0

You mean the Four-Chan Bureau of Investigation?

12
Am_I_a_Coward 12 points ago +13 / -1

No, it was 4chan. Our own government is not nearly this competent or creative.

2
Am_I_a_Coward 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are correct. On one side is, indeed, only the Christians/Capitalists (we invented the concept). But on the other side is an unholy union of the following religiopolitical systems:

Communism/Socialism, New Age/Anarchism, Atheism/Consumerism, Islam/Pure, Distilled Evil (Mandatory Violent Sadistic Pedophilic Psychopathy for, and Enslavement of, all Humans, and also kill all their dogs), the Aztec cult of Human Sacrifice, which call themselves "Mexican"/"Latino" and "Catholic", and that old Egyptian cult of rich chameleons, who also worship Ba'al, Moloch, and Satan for some reason, which built the Pyramids, and which claims to be "Jewish" these days. I think that the Muslims are less evil than the Aztecs, and that the Aztecs are less evil than the Ra-worshippers/Molochites/Satanists. But the Muslims are easily the most functional and civilized of these three people groups, so they are the biggest threat.

Thank God for Barack Obama, for he and the Muslims saved all of humanity from being sacrificed to Moloch in thermonuclear star-fire at the hands of the Clintons and the Molochites.

1
Am_I_a_Coward 1 point ago +1 / -0

"The information in the video is correct."

Thank you. I win.

Good day :)

1
Am_I_a_Coward 1 point ago +2 / -1

The Jews do not get to claim perpetual status as history's greatest victims (that is, history's biggest losers). The title of "History's Biggest Losers" clearly must go to the Mainland Taiwanese, their people having been conquered and subjugated more times than any other people group, like some sort of twisted 9000-year gang rape Conga line. Compared to the Mainland Taiwanese, the Jews have endured jack-all with regards to human suffering.

Belittling all comparisons to the Holocaust makes it impossible to prevent the next Holocaust from occurring. Also, we should not wait until the next Holocaust is complete before we decide that we have enough evidence of sufficient Hitlerocity to intervene. Finally, even though Benji and buddies think otherwise, the Universe does not literally revolve around the Jews.

0
Am_I_a_Coward 0 points ago +1 / -1

Again, Q is merely a pseudonym outside of the peculiar series of image board posts where the name was first used. This video is not by the originator of this "Q" character, because it is on an entirely separate digital platform, and in an entirely different multimedia format, than the actual Q text posts. So, you are not only using the Ad Hominem formal logical fallacy, but also, since it's not the same person as the real Q, that logical fallacy is not even a usable tactic for "debunking" this particular video. Even if Ad Hominem were not a formal fallacy, even if it were a correct form of reasoning, it does not apply here.

As for Sessions (and Barr), it was necessary to slow-walk any substantive measures against the Deep State because of the threat of rioting from all the brainwashed zombies. Jeff Sessions was, and still is, on our side. If the cities can be retained intact through a, historically speaking, miniscule delay of 10 or fewer years, this is clearly a superior result in terms of net present value to the case of immediate justice, where all the cities burn. Quit your emotional reasoning and do your cost/benefit analyses on these things.

As for a global internet outage, there have been numerous regional disruptions in internet service over the past several years. But regardless of that point, you internet debaters are too used to arguing against fundamentalist Christians and their claims of Biblical inerrancy. Debunking fundamentalism is a specialized form of debate, which is not generally applicable to other topics. Disproving any one prophecy within a scripture only affects other portions of the scripture if that scripture claims its own inerrancy as proof of its own truthfulness. We "Q-tards" are making no such elementary blunders of circular reasoning here. Has anyone said that Trumpllah is God and Q is His Prophet? Like, not as a joke? No? Then your point about the internet outage is irrelevant.

Oh, and your point about "that video is old"? Gosh, Newton's Principia Mathematica is so ancient it may as well have been written by Pythagoras. Guess we can just discard the whole idea of calculus, then. By God, are you really making the, what do you even call that, the Novelty Fallacy? This droolingly-retarded, helmet-wearing idea you young folks have that the newest information is always the most reliable information? That's clearly false. Don't even try that shit with me.

Finally, Trump runs a tight ship, and despises leakers. If Q was an unauthorized, but legit, source, then it is possible that Trump fed different fake scheduling info to various people to identify exactly who this loose-lipped Q person is, to plug up the leak. Or, the specific date might have been an authorized misdirection ploy. Or, Q might be mixing falsehoods in with the truth to maintain plausible deniability or something like that. These counterpoints do not prove Q's reliability, of course. But they do demonstrate, yet again, that claims not being made alongside a claim of literal inerrancy are separable, and therefore, must be considered separately in debate.

If you have a disagreement with any specific point in the video, let's hear it. Until then, you are not making a serious attempt at academic discussion, so responding to your useless prattle further is a waste of my time. Good day.

1
Am_I_a_Coward 1 point ago +1 / -0

Leftists (Communists and Consumerists) sneer at childish humor, an extension of their envious hatred of all children for their youth, innocence, and purity. These are 3 things that the greedy can never steal from them, and 3 ways in which the narcissistic will always be inferior to them. Capitalists love children and childish humor, because unlike Leftists, we do not extinguish the spark of childhood within ourselves through hedonism and cruelty.

(ed: Communism and Consumerism are the exact same system. This is because governments and corporations are the exact same type of entity: a bureaucracy. Under both systems, an Egyptian-style class of priest-bureaucrats provide all and control all. Truly, the Nile and the Sun-Ra rise and fall in their appropriate courses thanks to the omnipotently magnanimous benefience of the priest-bureaucrats.)

3
Am_I_a_Coward 3 points ago +3 / -0

We don't want it because "they" are screaming and yelling at us to take the vaccine so super freaking loud. A big new disease goes around the world every 3 years or so. Each time, nobody cares. This latest big bug looks the same as the rest. Why all the super big angry panic now? Totally unnatural. Very suspicious.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›