Good tech writing. I love concise writing, conciseness being the core of the art of tech writing. It takes so much more effort for me to write concisely than this lazy stream of consciousness internet writing I usually do these days. Your document is perhaps even a bit too concise, which is the first time that I have said that particular criticism. That was a compliment.
Suggest replacing numeric list type with bulleted list. Alternately, just use plain tab indentation without bullets etc.
Fixed-width (console) fonts are appealing to us computer junkies, but from a typography and readability perspective, they are strictly inferior to variable-width fonts (save for a handful of specialized use cases). I suggest replacing the console font with a variable width font such as Arial.
Unclear/redundant section titles:
"Information", "General Factors", "Public Mitigation Failures"
Sections that are best combined:
Names, Information
Testing, Detection
Transmission, General Factors, Public Mitigation Failures
Suggest using comma separated lists instead of a fourth indentation level
I could figure out other suggestions, probably, but at some point all I am doing is replacing the inquirer's document with my own writing.
Happy writing!
The hero we needed; not the hero we deserved.
Concise. I am convinced now. All hope is lost. A+
You are a decoder ring.
Hate to break it to you, but that's the Ad Hominem logical fallacy. Q is a pseudonym used by various individuals of indeterminate hat color. Since "Q" is not a single individual or organization, any claimants making use of the name must be judged on the merits of their particular claims. You have provided no disagreements with any specific information in the video, because there is nothing there that you have rational basis to disagree with.
Eastern Orthodoxy is last remaining branch of the true Church.
Doo doo-doot doo... Doot doo-doot doo!
Every smiling Trump takes my grump-O-meter down by a notch or two. His plan, what little I can puzzle out, is brilliant, but it's a long shot. It's the best shot we have, and he's the best shooter we've got, but I only see odds of 50/50 or a bit better. My hope is that Trump is smiling because he has secret information that indicates much better odds.
Of course, Trump is too smart to confuse "planning" with "scheduling." Planning at Trump's level is more like engineering a giant computer program for the guidance of the self, a program which includes microeconomic simulations of similar programs used by all the other important good and evil actors, macroeconomic simulations of all the different groups of us irrelevant people in the peanut gallery, and an error-checking program for the self that monitors Trump's own particular set of personal flaws from a highly impartial perspective.
Ignorant, stupid programmers spend all their time writing "do J at time A, then K at time B, then L at time C...". Same with other sorts of planning. Real bona fide planners like Trump create time schedules as a "free action" as needed, since all the thinking work is done automatically by subprograms hardwired in the neurons through years of hacking the self.
All this to say, don't ask me what I think Trump will do, or when. That's a schedule. The plan is a flowchart. I don't really know what that is, either. But what I do know is, the plan IS Trump. The sum total of whatever is bumping around in Trump's head IS the plan. And the Trump program appears to be operating perfectly.
Indeed, calling China a country is that which should merit apology. Mainland Taiwan, and that little island to the southeast of it everyone seems to want for some reason, is an excellent country indeed. The Maoist occupation of the continental portion of Taiwan is a troublesome, but temporary, matter of negligible long-term importance.
Hot dang, that's totally right!
We have to form our own fortified, economically-isolated arcologies/city states/fortified compounds, and defend ourselves from the barbarian hordes.
If you think the Jews are the Eye at the Top of the Pyramid, you are sorely mistaken. There is no pyramid, and there is no eye at the top. Evil is, and always has been, a tangled spaghetti mesh of competing groups of conspirators, each individual conspirator being associated with numerous, shifting, oniony layers of formal and informal feuds and alliances. It is just because evil people like being sneaky like that. The perfectly constructed, orderly, bureaucratic (Jewish) pyramid of evil that you envision is merely set dressing, a flimsy wooden triangle meant to portray an illusion of omnipotence.
Hitler was a failed art student, a methamphetamine addict, and a limp-wristed VEGETARIAN. He committed suicide like a feckless coward. He even invaded Russia in winter, you stupid cunt. Hitler was a stinking, two-faced, lying, soy-soaked, emo-haired, Commie CUCK, and your stupid dollar-bill Masonic or whatever pyramid is a LIE.
The Jews are a red herring, meant to distract us from the Muslims and all the other alleged humans who are well on their way in the process of returning to monkey. The problem is the PRIMITIVES. Have you ever been accosted by a Jew in the street? See any Jewish gangs roaming around, thumping accordion music from their minivans while twisting their fingers into those crazy Jewish gang signs? Had any piss-soaked yarmaluke hats thrown at your face lately? No? Then maybe the Jews are not the problem.
We civilized folk need to quarantine ourselves from the primitives, because they want to shoot us. It is the same protocol as for dealing with picture show zombies. It's just that the zombie virus turned out to be informational as opposed to biological. The Jews, for all their faults, as we all have, are civilized. The actual Jews should be protected in the compounds. Heretical, weatlhy, famous Jews, just like the same such people among the Catholics, would be disallowed entry for being part of the spaghetti of conspiracies, not for formal religious affiliation per se.
Two solutions. One of them is cheaper.
Option One (your proposal): Fight two separate enemies on two fronts while standing between them, Hitler-style, producing a Pyrrhic victory (much blood, break-even cost/benefit or worse) in the best case, or an embarrassing defeat in the average case.
... (ed. holy shit I made it all bold here on accident. My mind-ears are still ringing.) The enemy is very numerous, and has no morals. They might prove more capable of learning from their mistakes than we keep saying. We need to stop relying on the enemy's incompetence to win everything for us NOW, before they fix that problem. So, I prefer: ...
Option Two (my proposal): Pit our two great enemies, the black gangs and the Mexican gangs, against each other through the clever strategy of stepping out from in between them, stopping using lethal force to prevent the war that they both really really want with each other, and letting them just genocide each other like they keep trying to do all the time continuously regardless of our efforts.
Too expensive. Make Mexico pay for it, Trump-style. Left to themselves (har), the Left will form, Voltron-like, into a whirling helicopter of chaos, crashing into the ground of their own accord as both helicopterer and helicopteree combined. We do not need (nor should we want) Trump's approval to both remove ourselves from the equation, and also solve the equation, at the same time, in this fashion.
Exactly. By trading with the enemy, who cannot sustain their respective existences otherwise, we provide aid and comfort to the enemy. It is treason to sell a hamburger to a Leftist. No humanitarian exceptions for communists. No water traded from our aquifers if they are thirsty. No food traded from our larders if they are hungry. No blankets for sale if they are cold. Let them prove the superiority of their economic system, NOW, without the training wheels of the remnants of Capitalism that we civilized folk provide.
They want all this land, let them have it. They will choose to bleed and starve among the vast and bountiful lands of America, free from civilized interference as we watch from our fortified compounds, just like they choose to bleed and starve among the vast and bountiful lands of all of Africa. Then, once they finish reducing their own numbers to 1/100 of their starting population over 30-40 years, we can re-colonize North America and work on slowly integrating any well-behaved survivors, whose children's children's children's children MIGHT be safe to permit entry into the new America as full citizens, IF they prove worthy of merit.
I am a conservative. I was briefly allured by the concept of a "Nordic-style hybrid economic system," being a reasonable sort of person who prefers compromise to conflict. Apparently, all that "moderate" crap I bought into between 2004 and 2012 or so was false advertising. Destroyed my reputation through retarded social media posts during that time; burned and salted my online presence later.
False bargaining positions are despicable. I met the Liberals halfway at Uni, at exactly the bargaining position they proposed. Now, they say the opposite of every single line item that previously composed their platform. How do you negotiate a peaceful compromise with an enemy who opposes truthful negotiations and enforceable contracts on principle?
I cannot even work alongside these people anymore. I do not want the Left as customers. I do not want the Left as coworkers. Not as managers. Not as neighbors. I do not want to drink water that has been downstream of a Leftist. I want a barrier of a hundred miles of solid, mountainous granite in between myself and the nearest Leftists to the west and to the east of my location.
Thanks for the kind words! I feel much better now.
I tried to reason with a leftist in their native language once. But the store manager there kicked me out for "farting at the customers" while "clucking like a chicken". Now I can't go there anymore...