1
AmericaFirst 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is stupid. We need to punish and humiliate Mitch and the GOPe Senate. Not give them control.

1
AmericaFirst 1 point ago +1 / -0

The GOP establishment must pay a heavy price for their betrayal. I will be voting Democrat just to help destroy them. When a party comes along that is unabashedly America-First then they'll get my vote.

2
AmericaFirst 2 points ago +2 / -0

Plenty of old movies I haven't seen. That's what I mostly watch.

2
AmericaFirst 2 points ago +2 / -0

The tweet isn't wrong. They don't deserve our votes, but it's also true that it's in our best interest to vote for them anyway. I don't know how this election will go, but the base would be a lot more fired up if we were winning on everything rather than ceding ground while nominally in power.

2
AmericaFirst 2 points ago +2 / -0

I figured this was the plan the moment he announced the California shutdown.
Get the Federal government to bail out all of their spending. Unlike leaders on the right Gavin is bold. He's also the reason we have gay marriage. When that was illegal he allowed it anyway and dared the courts to block it. He won that fight.

9
AmericaFirst 9 points ago +9 / -0

Bond holders would get destroyed (not that they shouldn't) so I'm doubtful. The Fed would probably just buy those bonds giving the states a backdoor bailout.

1
AmericaFirst 1 point ago +3 / -2

Finally. Even notorious open borders defender Charlie Kirk wants to suspend immigration. I'm honestly hoping the economy never recovers because they'll be back to their old tricks when it does.

5
AmericaFirst 5 points ago +5 / -0

Shave. Try to get a close fit. It doesn't have to be perfect to reduce the risk significantly.

12
AmericaFirst 12 points ago +12 / -0

To add to this Facebook was under $50 in late 2013 which is the start of that chart. Facebook is now $163.

So, FB investors tripled their money while Twitter investors lost nearly half.

3
AmericaFirst 3 points ago +3 / -0

Twitter's been banning conservatives forever. Mass immigration advocate Charlie Kirk is only a fiscal conservative. He is probably happy he doesn't have to try and argue against socialism on Twitter after the massive corporate welfare that his globablist sponsors are receiving. He's also piled onto smear campaigns against social conservatives who were being deplatformed so I'm glad it's his turn.

1
AmericaFirst 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am very skeptical that illegals won't get this. My understanding is that illegals normally use stolen or fake social security numbers for their employment. There are numerous articles related to illegals and social security numbers, e.g.:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/illegal-immigrants-cited-in-theft-of-39-million-social-security-numbers

So, those illegals will get the free money. The ITIN restriction might affect mostly legal immigrants. Similar thing happens in California colleges (and presumably other states). Illegals get to pay in-state resident tuition (much lower) and foreign students who respect the law pay a much higher out of country rate.

3
AmericaFirst 3 points ago +3 / -0

lol, they should sell them here.

3
AmericaFirst 3 points ago +3 / -0

We should also hold people like Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, and virtually everyone invited to CPAC accountable. These are people who are supposed to be conservatives, but champion globalism, mass immigration, could care less about our culture, and normally only want to debate socialism.

Now these same "conservatives" are begging for government handouts for heavily leveraged multinational companies who need help from their globalism caused pandemic.

3
AmericaFirst 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's really disappointing is that people on the right who do have a platform often join in when they left goes after someone. Milo, Laura Loomer, Nick Fuentes, Michelle Malkin are people you won't see at CPAC anymore and are generally not on any network.

The left is much smarter about this. When the right goes after one of their people, e.g. Linda Sarsour, they are sure to defend the person by inviting her on their shows and giving them a platform while they are under attack.

3
AmericaFirst 3 points ago +3 / -0

Social Media has been ramping up their bias non-stop for the past four years. I love Trump, but "monitoring the situation" isn't nearly enough of a response to this threat.

6
AmericaFirst 6 points ago +7 / -1

Sessions failed the country when we needed him most. He protected the swamp his entire time as AG and allowed them to go after Trump when the conventional DC wisdom was that Trump was vulnerable. Sessions is loyal to himself. Tommy might not be any better, but may as well give him a chance.

19
AmericaFirst 19 points ago +19 / -0

I think it would mean no social security or medicare deductions which hammer workers (and employers who have to match some of that), but probably the income tax would remain. Sounds too good to be true though.

6
AmericaFirst 6 points ago +6 / -0

Excellent. Politicians love money more than anything so maybe it will have an effect.

view more: Next ›