The excess in other "buckets" prove the ballot box was stuffed after the first count was over, to match up with the reported numbers.
It would be caught in a legit recount, but a recount without adequate observation / chain of custody would allow them to just do the same thing all over again (manually).
Even after that, they were missing about thousands from that one polling place. From the video earlier today - the meeting where they certified the results - they said they managed to reduce the shortfall by reallocating which "bucket" the ballots were in. Evidently they had spare (fraudulent) ballots of one type (e.g. mail in vs. provisional vs. early) so they switched which category those were in (on the computer) and were able to get the total within about 800 or so...
If that was true, then why did the observers leave and why were they told that counting would resume at IIRC 8:30 the next morning and why the media claim saying a pipe burst.
No sane person wants people to vote. Trump supporters want people to vote for Trump. Biden supporters want people to vote for Biden. People who profess that they don't care who you vote for, just get out and vote, are lying. They think they own you and that they already know who you'll vote for... they just have to crack the whip.
Well voting is a personal choice. There's lots of people who simply don't have the time or inclination to be informed and care about politics and stay up to date.... That's their right, and there's a problem if you want these ignorant people to vote even though they believe that they shouldn't be voting. It's like telling people to go buy a gun, even if they don't want a gun. Yeah, people have a right to own a gun, but if someone doesn't want to have one in their house... they're the person who should be making that decision.
Radiators, like lungs, need air flow.
It doesn't disenfranchise 850 voters, or 3500 voters, or w/e... the voters never existed! They were fraudulent ballots.
So it was scanned into the wrong bucket?
Now they're fudging the in-person vs. mail-in vs. provisional ratios.
Yeah, I interpreted it as more than 2, because normally you'd say "in a couple weeks." However "1" is also a number. "Ask me next week" fits the timeline.
Q: How many signatures have you reviewed?
A: We haven't gotten to that part yet.
SOS doesn't even know how signature verification was (wasn't) done... Computers? Maybe! There's lots of ballots... and it's a bad methods..... AKA there was no legitimate signature match.
He's not doing the SOS a good service. He's avoiding the questions. The best he's doing is looking like a scared pawn, but the Senate is either going to do the right thing or it won't. If they cut him a break they weren't going to do anything anyway.
They should be separated for privacy.... but that's why its vital that there be real monitoring and legitimate ability to contest signatures when the mail in ballots are opened. If you fuck that up - as Georgia did - there's no way to fix it... and the whole election is spoiled.
This bullshit about people being mad because they "lost"... well, no shit. That's what cheating looks like. The winner never has an objection to winning. The objection will always come from the people who've been cheated... that doesn't prove that there wasn't cheating.
What is she even saying!?
Others too, but at least those.
Now that he's done with that, this is a great resource. He OUTLINED EVERY WAY THEY COMMITTED FRAUD. Check the list of things he's argued against and there's your list of how they did it.
Then you turn it in when you vote in person, they pull it out of the sleeve, mark Biden, and throw it into the bunch. It'll never show up as being received, 'cause the ballots dont (and shouldnt't) have you name on them.
Yeah, I got an absentee ballot that I never asked for. Very suspicious.
"We don't expect to see anything that will change the result...."
How do they know the results before they do the recount?!
We won't investigate because it has to be investigated to know if it's investigatable....
AKA our investigations are only foregone conclusions.
"We got a release of all signature match claims, which I think helped to accomplish our goal of not extending election day past November 3rd."
WTF. So they didn't match signatures because it would have taken time to match signatures?! Why have signatures?
Fuck the uniparty, MAGA.
He's just defending the DS GOP machine's DSing.
Depends on what you mean by "contested." What I was reading was saying, yes if a state's governer sends one set of "certified" votes from their electors and the Legislature sends another set of "certified" votes from the electors that they picked... then he can block all votes form that state.
Would love better info if anyone has it.