sure did!
But very few people could be bothered to understand this, bringing about this newer ruling the reinforces the previous rulings but brought up to a modern day understanding
Ultimately this case is just a "yeah the original ruling still holds", but in a legal context it's important as it makes it much harder for special interest groups to argue against it, and makes it much easier for anyone fighting discrimination based on gender (especially if they were denied employment for being male)
This ruling the justices specifically state they are only dealing with sex/gender
To make a ruling on race of a similar type a new case would need to be brought referencing this one as precedence - and I'm sure it would give the same outcome, but it needs to go to court for the specific topic of race
Ultimately, this ruling means that as a human you have equal rights and your sex/gender can not be discriminated against regardless of what it is.
Do nothing democrat libtards have no idea what they've unleashed and will work very very hard to frame this in a way to hide the reality of it
This ruling completely squashes quota hiring, bias hiring and any type of hiring that uses immutable traits to preferentially select.
All it needs is for someone to send a test case to set the precedent
The entire ruling actually makes specific points of not making it about gender, and instead makes it very clear that a persons gender/sex/identified preference can not be used to deny or give advantage to anyone
This is actually great, as it means that men can use these rulings in places like custody cases, access to gender based programs and anyone charging men more money due to muh wage gap.
I'm seeing far too many people making claims about implications of what this means, but really just pushing an agenda into the commentary.
This video reading by a lawyer is a straight reading of the ruling, with mild commentary.
The video is an hour and a half long, but if you want to understand it, without prestitutes putting a huge amount of agenda and spin on it, this is the way to go.
My takeaway is, the legal concept being used is "but for", as in, but for the sex/gender label this would not happen.
Basically, the ruling means using a persons gender to deny OR GIVE ADVANTAGE is discriminatory and thus not permissible
Netflix is controlled remember they gave Barry a bunch of money a few yeas ago?
nexflix redirecting the narrative should be obvious
sometimes people will try to bait others into talking on discord, where they then get the sucker to give up personally identifying information, or record them saying dumb stuff so they can blackmail them - or get them SWATTed (sending police to the address with a false active shooter claim)
Having a discord account isn't a problem, unless you like giving china full access to your PC via Tencent investment in discord.
Far too many people post personally identifying information in their discord accounts, and this makes them vulnerable to all kinds of problems
The vast majority of the time it's a hypothetical person.
Usually any mentions of "glowies" is a reminder to others to not post personally identifiable information, or to not join any discord links etc as those can be tracked directly back to you
Any post that fishes for information with questions or baiting people into identifying themselves/invites to discord etc are tagged as a glow post.
I'd bet 99 times out of 100 a user is not an agent of some government agency, but those same agencies would be fools for not monitoring the shit that flows through that place.
The Boogaloo thing is a setup to bait people into race war and more gun grabbing.
everyone on /pol/ who doesn't glow is against the whole concept
Only people who are trying to facilitate the setup are for the kind of retarded escalation accelerationism that the idea promotes.
If you are at a protest and you see one of these schmucks isolate and record them - don't let them set the narrative, shout over them when they talk to the prestitutes
Then, talk them down from being a useful idiot and bring them into this family
Don't let anyone use this false flag to take away your 2A rights and use your 1A rights to show everyone how we are being setup
The Whitehouse strategy team led Twitter right into this huge mistake, a perfect setup and Twitter took the bait.
The bias and agenda is becoming so visibly overt now that the amount of mental gymnastics MSM defenders need to do is off the charts
Now as people start to push the "looting/shooting" angle the average viewer is beginning to smell the rank stench of moral corruption coming from the "trusted media"
As things get closer to the election, the bad actors will get more desperate as they get boxed into the corner and they will inevitably hit a bullseye of mistakes, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate
Corona happened literally just after the CCP signed a new trade deal with the US, a trade deal that conveniently has a "force Majeure" clause that lets them back out of the deal without penalty if a major natural disaster happens
The timing of the deal signing has an overlap with the possibility of the CCP knowing that they had the WuhanFlu in Wuhan, so there's the possibility they signed in bad faith - which should surprise nobody, contracts in China are worth less that the toilet paper they steal from other countries
I've seen this being sent around a variety of places online
It's both hilarious and worrying as this type of propaganda will just push the CCP to lash out violently
old senile man and an old communist man
But what about Biden?
Prep isn't just having a few bags of supplies around
It's knowing what you're going to do once the 7 day mark passes
Where's your potable water coming from?
Where's your heat coming from?
Where's your waste going to go?
What are you going to do when people you don't know start knocking on your door demanding your supplies?
How ready are you to spend more than an hour walking anywhere?
How ready are you to do that while carrying a pack full of supplies?
Prepping is having a bunch of stuff, but also a mindset of thinking out a number of plans ahead of time so that whatever situation arises you can handle it, or at least get started on handling it while you work on a better plan
Even with limited resources having a plan ready to go means you are ahead of everyone else around you, which means you can maximize your opportunity by being able to act quicker
Standard practice for incumbent unelected administrators
The simplest thing would be to ensure the right people are talking in his ear instead of the "it's just a flu bro" crowd
Holy shit, this guy had every opportunity to just sleep it off in the car, but instead decided to escalate at every chance
And to everyone saying it was "for no reason"
The tard took a taser, shot at cops, what were they supposed to do?
Let him run off with a deadly weapon? Let him use it on innocent people?
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes, and Mr No Fucking Reason you need to sit your ass down and shut up while grown folks is talking
I hope Robert Barnes takes this case so he can righteously slap it down and shame every one trying to lynch these officers for doing their job