0
AngryBrit2 0 points ago +1 / -1

Worked for what? How are you determining what works and doesn't if there is no test for "SARS-CoV-2"? How are you even determining there is a pandemic of a novel viral disease?

3
AngryBrit2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not vaccines work.

0
AngryBrit2 0 points ago +1 / -1

There’s no containing a non-existent virus whose pandemic is generated through meaningless diagnostic tests and imposing a novel socially-constructed narrative onto phenomena which are in no way novel or out of the ordinary.

If most of TDW even are stupid enough fall for this mix of conspiracy and self-deception, there’s no hope for society at large.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every good Communist makes the world a little bit better.

2
AngryBrit2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Clearly, if the CCP are taking the time to defend him, he must be innocent. The Chinese Communists are not very bright as far as self-awareness goes.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +2 / -1

Freud was a quack and psychoanalysis is bunk anyway. "Id, ego, super ego" are not real.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Happiness is subjective, and all individuals should pursue happiness however they want - as long as they don't fuck things up for others (aka the Non-Aggression Principle).

Do you consider yourself to have proved this or do you not believe it?

2
AngryBrit2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only believe what you can prove.

Alright then. Go ahead and prove your epistemological presuppositions. Go ahead and prove the conditions that constitute a proof without presupposing those conditions. Go ahead and empirically prove Empiricism.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would anyone feel intellectually insecure when confronted by opinions almost inevitably grounded in the equally religiously-held and logically incoherent presuppositions of Empiricism and Metaphysical Naturalism?

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +1 / -0

And anyone vaguely familiar with the endless spats between monarchs and Rome will see how retarded this idea of "collusion" is. By the way, who colluded to bring about the German Reformation? German kings, their Lutheranism being a front for a politically-motivated move against the Habsburg emperor to put more power in their own hands.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +1 / -0

What narrative?

And what "Dark Ages"? No serious historian even uses that term anymore, having been concocted by Renaissance humanists who regarded anything besides their construct of the "Classical" ideal as barbarism and spun into a grand myth by the philosophes of the Enlightenment.

2
AngryBrit2 2 points ago +3 / -1

Speaking of shit, Martin Luther tells us he came up with the doctrine of sola fide while sitting on the privvy and threw his own faeces at the Devil in one of their arguments.

“Devil, I have just shit in my trousers. Have you smelled it?” —Martin Luther.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +1 / -0

The average erect length of a Chinese Communist Party member's penis is 4 inches. No wonder you're so obsessed.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›