4
AngryBrit2 4 points ago +5 / -1

That’s what they’ve ALWAYS done. Polio, measles, and umpteen other “viral pandemics” are all human creations: creations of the human imagination. They sell you snake oil for something that doesn’t exist and does nothing about the actual incidences of the symptoms defining these diseases.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends. Unless one is a true believer in unprovable presuppositions of Neoliberal ideology, one will recognise that this “capitalism” can and does in fact lead to its own compromise when certain human beings, if there is no greater power to thwart them, by their accumulated wealth gain the power to deprive others of that freedom and voluntary exchange.

So long as there is SIN in this world, there need to exist law and the power to enforce it.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +1 / -0

And explain how they are less in support of Trump than you...as your statement implies.

My statement doesn’t imply any such thing. So now that we’ve established you have no logical acumen ...

I support Trump because of what he purportedly stands for and promises to fight for, in the hope that it is true. THAT is my cause. Christ. Liberty. Sanity. Defeat of Satan. My cause is not Trump.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I am. What I’m not is a Trump-faction NPC. Do you have an actual argument, or are you one of those?

2
AngryBrit2 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you have one, I’m all ears for a sound argument against the content of my post and how Pence not taking a constitutionally sound action to reject fraudulent electors because of a fear of the repercussions is substantially different to what all the Trump-appointed SCOTUS did to the Texas lawsuit. Or you can respond like a cultivar idiot who is obviously just another faction of NPCs.

2
AngryBrit2 2 points ago +2 / -0

How does one measure the efficacy of any measure at stopping infection when there is no way to obtain meaningful data on infections?

2
AngryBrit2 2 points ago +2 / -0

What Esau should have done is take up a club and beat that little weasle to a pulp, then had his dinner in peace.

22
AngryBrit2 22 points ago +26 / -4

No you didn’t. No they didn’t. What you had were symptoms that have been around forever which you coloured with the narrative fed to you by society.

6
AngryBrit2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Funny, being that the conceptual distinction of "objective" and "subjective" as used today is a Kantian invention and Kant even believed in an objective deontological moral truth.

7
AngryBrit2 7 points ago +8 / -1

What idea of Kant's? Kant wasn't a relativist.

2
AngryBrit2 2 points ago +2 / -0

9 out of 10 severe cases were in placebo group, one in the vaccine group

Define case.

It's one thing question the test accuracy, but severe cases aren't easy to fake.

Cases of what?

You don't just get to carry unproven assumptions into the interpretation of data to support your narrative. Without a test for SARS-CoV-2 infection, you have nothing. You have nothing to show a viral cause of symptoms or that an alleged artificially prepped immune system combats this virus, much less reduces transmission rates. At best you will have shown that people who get ill like you now are less likely to get ill a little time later, but the immediate negative responses to the vaccination aren't included in their "case" numbers, are they? You haven't even reduced incidents of illness.

15
AngryBrit2 15 points ago +15 / -0

Do you believe they faked the patient sample groups and studies across each manufacturer?

Do you believe that giant corporations from a trillion-dollar industry, who effectively control the scientific narrative and stand to make billions through a fascist business deal, can be trusted to not fudge data and be impartial in their interpretations?

But what exactly do you think the results of those studies, taking the data at face value, show? How does one accurately measure relative risk reduction when, due to the total lack of a gold standard, absolutely no tests of known accuracy exist for determining that a person is infected with SARS-CoV-2?

-4
AngryBrit2 -4 points ago +7 / -11

Stupid is as stupid does. The "side effects" are not over. You just had your body permanently altered by the world's first approved-for-human mRNA vaccine. Fucking idiot. You deserve everything that's coming to you.

That, and we're finding out that otherwise asymptomatic people are sometimes getting strokes from it.

Strokes from SARS-CoV-2 ... idiot confirmed.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +1 / -0

World War 1, widespread malnutrition, extreme stress, industrial overload and 190,000 tonnes of poison gases manufactured and deployed ...

But people still think a “virus” caused the Spanish Flu epidemic.

Why?

The genetic picture of a “virus” didn’t even exist back then. It was certainly never isolated, micrographed or shown in any kind of scientific study to cause the symptoms of that disease.

2
AngryBrit2 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nobody has demonstrated the virus to be real, faggot. Never purified from a host and its genome theoretically reconstructed from unidentified short sequences through computer algorithms based upon assumptions about what it ought to look like. No meaningful tests to show its presence in anyone, even assuming the reality of that sequence, because there is no gold standard by which to determine the accuracy of the tests. Never shown in a controlled study to cause any of the set of non-specific symptoms associated with “COVID-19” in healthy human beings or even to cause cell lysis in vitro, not least since no actual isolate exists in the first place. You’re the one larping.

5
AngryBrit2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don’t buy this stupid shit that the Star of Bethlehem was some natural phenomenon and not a divine miracle.

1
AngryBrit2 1 point ago +2 / -1

She’s not elite though. Just a court servant.

2
AngryBrit2 2 points ago +2 / -0

And how would you test their efficacy anyway when there’s no actual test of known accuracy for infection in the first place? The purported case numbers are all completely meaningless with regard to this hypothesised infectious disease.

You can’t control what doesn’t exist.

7
AngryBrit2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Stop being an idiot.

2
AngryBrit2 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Science"

If a "scientist" at this level is so fundamentally intellectually retarded he can bring himself to believe in the nonsense of gender theory and meaningfulness of a term like "nonbinary trans", what does that tell you about "authority" and science?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›