3
Animator 3 points ago +3 / -0

You have 25 years more experience than me, but I've never seen anything like it either.

Lived in CA all my life and watched the gradual descent in to authoritarianism. We finally left because of all the vaccine legislation they were passing, it was the last straw for us. I thought we'd buy ourselves some time in Texas. I never imagined how FAST they'd seize our freedoms, or how easily people would hand them over.

5
Animator 5 points ago +5 / -0

I love how they just get to declare what is and isn't science now.

3
Animator 3 points ago +3 / -0

grotesque spectacle

Absolute perfect summary of 2020

6
Animator 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm north of Austin and I'm seeing the same thing. Everywhere I turn are these brainwashed retards wearing masks outside, in their cars, away from other people. There's no mandate for outdoor area, they're doing it voluntarily.

It's starting to make me so mad I don't even want to go outside anymore. It's too infuriating/sad seeing how pathetic and brainwashed so many Americans have become.

20
Animator 20 points ago +20 / -0

What information are these idiots looking at that makes them support masks?

If a cloth or paper mask worked then why do you wear a respirator to paint a car?! If cloth or paper masks can't even stop paint fumes why do these retards think they can stop a virus?

Jesus, read a fucking study you imbeciles. Who the hell is convincing all these so-called leaders to support pure pseudoscience?

7
Animator 7 points ago +7 / -0

Please read up on The Great Reset. The lockdowns are indefinite. The aim is to cripple the general population financially.

When they're at a point of total desperation the government will introduce a Universal Basic Income, but it will come with conditions:

Forfeiture of private property rights, privacy rights, etc

Mandatory vaccination/health passports/social credit system

Likely relocation to city centers

I truly believe this is where they plan to take us. And I plan on resisting with bullets if it comes to it.

1
Animator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like everyone else is saying, no, because masks don't protect you from anything smaller than dust.

They will likely be much more sickly though since they will have been routinely breathing through moist, bacteria-ridden cloth which leads to all kinds of health problems.

There's a whole other list of health risks caused by extended mask wearing, not to mention the psychological harm and social conditioning.

But cloth and paper masks don't even filter out paint fumes so they'll all still be exposed to plenty of viruses and other germs.

1
Animator 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're a hero! Please, keep it up for all the people too weak/stupid to do it for themselves!

1
Animator 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with you 100%. I've read all the mask studies, masks are worthless. They're worse than worthless, they're actually harmful if you have high blood pressure for example.

Yet I was still harassed by multiple people shopping yesterday who don't know their ass from their elbow for not complying, even though I know the science and they don't.

The science was ALWAYS against every single one of these terrible Covid responses, by my point is, that didn't stop any of it from happening.

The more they say "follow the science" the more you can be sure science has nothing to do with it.

And that's my worry with having a vaccine now. They didn't care about the established science before, why would they start now?

2
Animator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just playing Devil's Advocate, but doesn't this also introduce the excuse for mask mandates and lockdowns for the unvaccinated?

1
Animator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I read the article. Seems even shadier than normal.

With Covid at a 99.98% recovery rate I won't be getting it regardless.

3
Animator 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is standard practice for vaccines and exactly why I don't trust the safety profiles on them at all.

Robert Kennedy Jr. has talked about this a lot.

Vaccines and the pharma companies are some seriously shady business.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +4 / -7
4
Animator 4 points ago +4 / -0

I know what you mean. It's hard to be sane and watch the world go crazy.

2
Animator 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was reading an interesting article in the Epoch Times about using the Insurrection Act to seize election materials to get a proper vote audit since the cheating States haven't followed their own laws regarding chain of command, signature verification, segregation of votes received after deadline, etc.

No violence, military is just used to enforce existing law.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/case-for-president-trumps-invoking-insurrection-act-to-restore-election-integrity_3610513.html

Link might be behind a paywall. But interesting strategy, anyway. I mean, it seems like the perfect use of that power when the States refuse to follow law and no court will grant any kind of relief or even hear the merits of a case brought to them.

2
Animator 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm ready. I'm hear people saying "No! America is ours and we're taking it ALL back!"

I agree with this sentiment, but at the same time I no longer have any desire to share a country with authoritarian Communists who beg the government to take away the rights of it's citizens.

I'm ready to split off and live in a country that actually respects and defends individual liberty above all else. There is no greater good than the freedom of the individual.

2
Animator 2 points ago +2 / -0

To me SCOTUS has already signaled that they're not planning to get involved. I know we have PILES of evidence. The fraud is so blatant it's sickening. But the judicial has been nothing but obstructive so far.

1
Animator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Demanding that other States abide by the Electors Clause in the Constitution is not a Dictatorship, you dumbass.

In a national election, election laws or changes to them must go through the State legislature. The defendant States deliberately went AROUND their legislatures to make changes to the rules.

1
Animator 1 point ago +1 / -0

No! That is a fundamental misunderstanding of the case. This was about the Electors Clause and that the defendant states specifically went around the legislature to change election rules, which is a violation of the clause! There is nothing authoritarian about parties entering in to a contract abiding by the agreements of that contract.

3
Animator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just called and left a piece of my mind on voice mail. There's nothing not to support about the lawsuit. States either agree to abide by the Electors Clause or the Constitution is meaningless.

Guess Chip thinks the Constitution doesn't matter.

3
Animator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Absolutely. Mask mandates and other restrictions are 1) An **inexcusable ** violation of our rights and 2) Have absolutely NO scientific backing whatsoever.

There is NONE, zero, not a shred of data that shows any of these measures helps in any way, and a lot of data that shows it actually hurts. If they don't understand that it's our responsibility as citizens to assess our own risks and make decisions accordingly, then they don't deserve to be in office.

God damn, it makes me so furious.

1
Animator 1 point ago +1 / -0

When you do actually send the message make sure you tell him to read the Electors Clause of the Constitution before he continues to embarrass himself.

23
Animator 23 points ago +23 / -0

I voted for that backstabbing piece of garbage, too. Dumbass doesn't even understand the Electors Clause. Takes an oath to uphold the Constitution but can't be bothered to learn what it says? Traitorous old shit-stain.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›