1
Anon_Army 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not a fan of Bernie, I oppose the left generally, but I also remember people with good intentions on that side getting screwed too.

1
Anon_Army 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm, I don't see the Powers That Be wanting to go into that territory. My instinct is that bringing the military into the political game gets messy for them.

2
Anon_Army 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps, does Podesta work for China though?

2
Anon_Army 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's cool, disagreement is fine.

I'm pissed at a bunch of the shit that's going on, I really am. That's why I post here. Shit's fucked up.

But public perception and credibility and moral standing all play a role in the game. I'm not saying one has to do nothing until liberals are completely on our side, but you have to look at the reality of the world as it is and make moves with full awareness of all the major factors, you have to be a canny player, not just "I'm pissed and this is bullshit so I'm not gonna think about how the game actually works"

2
Anon_Army 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with the sentiment but this is ignoring the game at play, we can be more effective by letting know we back up any people who are under threat. Just saying "the treason has been put to light" is ignoring our role and what more we can do. If you think the battle has already been won and you can stop figuring out how to fight better, I think you're sadly mistaken.

2
Anon_Army 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

I know he was dating the daughter, it definitely looks suspicious, don't get me wrong, but to convince more of the public against the entire media machine in cases of theories about literal murder, I think you need a more rock-solid case than just "suspicious".

There are levels of credibility to different cases based on evidence. Right now it's not a slam dunk to present the general public, even though to us it's definitely sketchy as fuck. And frankly, I'm far from 100% on it. BUT, if there really is a threat of a daughter or something, and they try to pull shit, we can make it clear we'll DEFINITELY see and be able to make a case no matter what the media says, and have the moral high ground to take major action.

2
Anon_Army 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, right now, just this one death of the staffer could be a coincidence, we don't really know. BUT, if another close person dies, then it's pretty clear there's some foul play, and for that time we need to have a threat in place that serious shit will go down.

3
Anon_Army 3 points ago +3 / -0

I made a graph of the timeline last night per someone's request. https://i.postimg.cc/xjt69hH3/GAPipe-Burst-Timeline.png

The original news story claimed pipe burst at 3 AM, count resumed at 11 AM: https://www.wvlt.tv/2020/11/04/some-ballots-will-not-be-counted-until-wednesday-in-georgia-following-water-main-break/

So the alleged stop of count happened at 10 PM? A huge spike came around 1:30 AM!! Fucking BULLSHIT!

5
Anon_Army 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bingo, that video that lady took, will alone probably impact the election more than that entire Hunter laptop shit, unless there's some mega fucking bombshell I missed.

0
Anon_Army 0 points ago +1 / -1

See, that video that lady took, will probably impact the election more than that entire Hunter laptop shit, unless there's some bombshell I missed.

2
Anon_Army 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea right after they figure out how both of Epstein's security cameras and guards were MIA. Same with the media.

1
Anon_Army 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look I haven't post much, but I am a promoted member in Data group, ask em, same name. I'm just leery of the timing here and think we gotta focus on the election stuff, that stuff can make difference with Trump the pres, I doubt this stuff will. But whatever, take some look through for a day or two, see if there's anything big, who knows some election-related stuff. But people won't give a shit if "Biden is corrupt", that's like Tuckers move from "there's massive fraud and cheating" to "big tech rigged things".

0
Anon_Army 0 points ago +2 / -2

We can focus on this stuff after the election is decided. Yea maybe longshot there's election-related stuff fine, but systemic rigged system is a bigger issue than whatever personal corrupt dealings the Bidens have. Take a look for a bit, but I don't think this stuff is going to move the needle. It's like Bannon said, the signal is exposing systemic rigging and pushing those points. The court isn't going to rule in Trump's favor because "Biden has ties to China" Oooh no! They'll just say Trump is owned by Putin and it's a tie. Persuasion-wise, I think this is a loser, but do what you guys want.

2
Anon_Army 2 points ago +3 / -1

I think this is an intentional distraction, focus on election fraud. The timing. We can get to the laptop after the election is over, no rush on that.

2
Anon_Army 2 points ago +3 / -1

Don't divert too much from election fraud though, I think this is an intentional distraction. The timing. We can get to it after the election is over.

3
Anon_Army 3 points ago +4 / -1

Don't divert too much from election fraud, I think this is a distraction.

14
Anon_Army 14 points ago +17 / -3

YES SAVE THIS FOR LATER, WE CAN GET TO IT LATER. SYSTEMIC ELECTION RIGGING IS BIGGER THAN ANY SCANDAL OF HUNTER BIDEN.

view more: Next ›