Election verification for me, but not for thee.
Good. Demonrats made this bed by setting unrealistic and dishonest standards against Trump, it's time we force them to lie in it. Shove all shit they spewed back down their throats and make them swallow those words.
Don't be sad that it's over. Be proud that it happened.
Can't hear shit captain
Well, the point of Gab is to be like facebook while Parler is more like twitter. Different type of social network. Parler is better suited for making public statements and is good for Politicians/Celebrities while Gab is better for talking mad shit with your pals.
At this point I suspect they are just blatantly making shit up and lying to try and piss enough Trump supporters off that they actually do commit some act of Terrorism. Don't fall for it. Don't give these lying inciters what they want. Fuck em.
Boycott it all. Don't buy anything on amazon, cancel your prime account if you have one, don't use Twitter, get your facebook friends to move to Gab, Never buy Apple products again ( I used to work for an apple AR, their products are trash anyways ), root your android to block google ads. Fuck em. Fuck all of em.
You give leftoids too much credit. They are angered by what happened on January 6th because the establishment media told them to be angry. The reality is there is no left or right anymore. There are people who think for themselves, and people who believe whatever bullshit the NWO Propaganda machine has to vomit out.
Because BLM is controlled opposition and their ideology is programmable by the deep state on command. We are not.
It's not about the optics. It's not even about the political ideology. It's about control. They can be controlled and told what to think by the elite. We Can't. That makes us the "bad guys™".
He's saying "No switched votes" when we already have verifiable and irrefutable proof that votes were at absolute bare-minimum switched in Antrim county. It's pretty safe to assume that this guys testimony is 100% maximum full-throttle gaslighting, in hopes that if he just repeats the MSM narrative they will cover for him and the plebs won't know any better.
The point isn't to change the results today, but creates legal standing for them to change results later. Basically, Trumps legal team can make the claim that all the DNC electors were fraudulent. Effectively, this means that today can no longer be considered the day when the election is over. It's a stall tactic.
Hello antitrust
If we all turn out with a rebel shout, the south shall rise again!
Over the line.
Wait I though he was allowing the signature audit. Did that shitstain rino betray us again?
Why does this thread have no OP post?
Yep. This video is massively lacking in context.
A big problem with this video is it really only makes sense if you watched his previous videos. If you just show this to a random person, they will be completely confused, not just because of the math but due to the complete and total lack of context.
There needs to be a "summary" version that also explains that what represents what, what the precincts are, how the leaves on the wheel represent what, what the wheel number exactly is, and how it matches up with the real election results. Without this context a lot of the video watches like "Hey look at this wheel look how it mathematically balances itself by averaging out the negative and positive sides real neato". Also WAY too much time is spent explaining how to balance averages on a wheel. This part is not difficult to understand, and results in a long winded explanation of something that is actually extremely simple. More time should be spent on falsifiability, and hard evidence that this did indeed happen by using the actual election data.
TL;DR good try, but severely lacking in context. Layman-speak needs to also layman the context or else it really isn't layman speak. The starcraft video does a better job providing layman-speak than this does.
I'm suspecting half these people don't know what debunked even means. They will say something is debunked, but not cite a source that shows it has been. Or they will, and the source is full of subjective trash-logic
Can't tell what he is doing, but there is definitely zero-security here. Computers with data up in an election office and people can just candidly walk up to it and do whatever? No guards? No rules? Again, can't see what he is doing on his screen so no idea if he is guilty of anything or not. The problem is he easily could be doing something wrong.
I made a similar meme on this earlier:
https://thedonald.win/p/11QRk9raW0/the-same-journalists-who-lied-to/c/
The extreme hypocrisy is astounding. They legit tried to impeach Trump for not even 1/100th of what we have on election fraud.
Why are we recounting using the same system that is being accused of improperly counting?
Holy shit, so much nonsense in their statement. Some quick debunking:
Dominion Voting Systems is the gold standard for transparent and accountable voting equipment
LMAO closed source software claiming to be the gold standard of transparency. Absolutely ludicrous.
The allegations included in the draft complaint are baseless, senseless, physically impossible, and unsupported by any evidence whatsoever.
Except for, you know, the analysis of their voting machines by experts that shows they are easily hackable.
It is important to understand that this is not possible—not on a machine-by-machine basis, not by alleged hacking, not by manipulating software, and not by imagined ways of "sending" votes to overseas locations.
Except for, you know, the analysis of their voting machines by experts that shows they are easily hackable.
But even if it were possible, it would have been discovered in the statewide handcount of votes.
Except for the fact that their machines can be setup to print and read fake ballots, and the recount didn't check the signatures to make sure the ballots were not faked. In other words, completely meaningless. We have explained this a thousand times.
For the record, again, Dominion does not develop voter-registration systems, poll-books, signature verification software, or provide vote-by-mail printing.
Strawman argument. Powell is not accusing them of also controlling the vote by mail process, whatever the heck they mean by that. And the lack of signature verification is a problem, not something to be proud of. LMAO.
Dominion was not "founded by oligarchs and dictators." It was founded in Toronto, Canada, and it is now a proud nonpartisan American company. Dominion has attested to its ownership—under penalty of perjury—to local, state, and federal agencies, including the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which includes all U.S. national security agencies. Dominion is not, and never has been, owned by Smartmatic. Neither has Smartmatic ever been a subsidiary of Dominion, as the complaint asserts. Dominion is an entirely separate company—they do not collaborate in any way and have no affiliate relationships or financial ties. Dominion does not use Smartmatic. These are all facts verifiable in the public record as well as in regulatory and legal filings. Dominion has no ties to the Venezuelan government, nor any other foreign government, including China and Iran. Dominion has never participated in any elections in Venezuela and has no connection or relationship with the now deceased former Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez. Other companies have serviced elections in Venezuela, but Dominion is not one of them.
This is where they hit FULL SCALE MAXIMUM GASLIGHTING. Wikileaks has DEBUNKED this. https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06CARACAS2063_a.html
Dominion and Smartmatic share business ties through their subsidiary, Sequoia voting systems. Two parent companies that trade between each other using a child company claiming to have no business or trade relationship is completely preposterous and blatant intentional deceit.
Not even going to debunk the rest because just from this lie alone we can safely disregard the entire statement as a steaming load of bullshit.
Not voting for someone isn't even the same thing as cancel culture. In the case of politicians, the entire point is to earn votes based on a platform and then to uphold that platform. If they betray and drop the beliefs that they platformed their campaign on, their voterbase is supposed to be able to get rid of them. Calling this natural process the same thing as "cancel culture" which attacks non-politicians whose positions are supposed to be on merit and not on the backs of voters is a false equivalency.