Riggers be like:
"We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. We know this was the most secure election in history because there is no evidence of fraud, and we know that all evidence of fraud cannot be true because this was the most secure election in history. "
https://examples.yourdictionary.com/circular-reasoning-fallacy-examples.html
In all seriousness, this is the very circular reasoning that Democrats are trying to use to block PA Senate from hearing Rudy Giuliani out. They are implying that they know he has no evidence of fraud because he has not shown it, therefore he should not be allowed to show the Senate any evidence of fraud. Simply amazing. The fact that they would even try to resort to such a shitty copout is just proof that they are complicit in the rigging.
We need to be more proactive against this kind of garbage reasoning and call it out for the objectively fallacious circular crap it is.
LONG time lurker here, I'm making this thread as my first post to not just remind you all that Dominion rigging the election is still Trumps most sane and realistic path to victory, but to prove it by showing simple evidence that the MSM and Dominion themselves are VERIFIABLY LYING about the facts surrounding Dominion.
The MSM often spins the truth, but this is extreme gaslighting level of lies. This proves they have something to hide.
BEGIN THE LIST:
VERIFIABLE LIE#1: "Conspiracy theories" about dominion can be written off as part of the "Qanon" movement. SOURCE: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/q-fades-qanon-s-dominion-voter-fraud-conspiracy-theory-reaches-n1247780
"But QAnon is far from done. The movement's recent evolution and activity around the Dominion conspiracy theory highlight how even Joe Biden's election win and the disintegration of the broader QAnon narrative do not spell the end of the broader conspiracy ecosystem it has built."
FACTS:
Most of the data we have regarding Dominion has either originated from here on TDW, or from https://twitter.com/We_Have_Risen, and from Powell.
Q himself has actually never directly said anything about Dominion. He has suggested there will be voter fraud, but a search through an archive of his posts reveals that they have never been mentioned ONCE.
The reality is Dominions issues would have come to light with or without Q. Regardless of what anyone here thinks about Qanon, he is somewhat of a non-factor here and NBC is simply trying to tie two unrelated conspiracies together to make both of them seem less credible. Problem is, anyone can look through Qs posts and see this is a lie.
VERIFIABLE LIE#2: There were no last minute updates to the software. SOURCE: https://www.newsweek.com/dominion-voting-systems-categorically-denies-election-tech-glitches-following-trump-accusations-1547405
"The company also denied allegations that its software was updated the night before the election"
FACTS:
Multiple election workers claimed that there were "Late night" or "Last minute" Updates to the software, and have come forward with this, noting how strange it was. This was reported on several credible local news sites, just to name a couple:
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/04/georgia-election-machine-glitch-434065
They 100% updated the software, and tried to gaslight the Board of Elections supervisor who noticed, excerpt:
"The supervisor, Marcia Ridley of the Spalding County Board of Elections, had initially attributed the problem to a vendor’s 11th-hour update to the equipment. But log files for the devices — electronic poll books that poll workers use to sign in voters at precincts — show that no such update occurred to the devices the night before Election Day, Ridley said in a statement to POLITICO on Thursday. However, she said she stands by her previous statements last week that a representative for the election technology vendor, Dominion Voting Systems, told her office that it had uploaded some kind of update the night before the election and that this had created the glitch."
VERIFIABLE LIE#3: Dominion is not in any way tied to the Clinton Foundation. SOURCE: https://www.startribune.com/posts-falsify-ties-between-election-tech-firm-and-democrats/573032441/?refresh=true
"CLAIM: Prominent Democrats including Pelosi, Feinstein and the Clinton family have a stake in or a deep relationship with Dominion Voting Systems, the second-largest voting vendor in the U.S., whose equipment was used in several battleground states in the 2020 election.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. Dominion made a one-time philanthropic commitment at a Clinton Global Initiative meeting in 2014, but the Clinton Foundation has no stake or involvement in Dominion's operations"
FACTS:
I saved the craziest lie for last. This one is particularly insane and brings gaslighting to a whole new level, because they actually admit to their own lie in their own claim. "Dominion made a one-time philanthropic commitment at a Clinton Global Initiative meeting in 2014". Reality check: You don't donate tens of thousands of dollars to a foundation that represents a political party that you have nothing to do with.
This is the media, taking an egg, holding the egg in front of your face, and then trying to tell you that it's not an egg. Absolutely amazing.
But the gaslighting of this lie goes even further!
IT SHOWS THEIR TIES TO EACH OTHER ON CLINTON FOUNDATIONS OWN WEBSITE. Complete with a nice shoutout.
The link speaks for itself. You can't make this shit up.
So why is this important?
TL;DR of it is that investigating Dominion is the right track. Basic detective 101 is that people don't outright lie like this unless there is something they don't want us to see. Dominion, and the leftwing media, have something to hide. What that "Something" is, who knows. Maybe team Trump already knows and is just fucking with Biden at this point. Or maybe he doesn't know and WE need to get to work on it.
If you have family or friends that doubt what you tell them, show them these links for yourself.
Peace.