I didn't ask, but I'd assume no
He wasn't even french but Corsican
I don't have the patience of a steel bar. Once the logic train goes choo choo off a bridge a few times I leave it there. Then I blow up the bridge.
Amen, brother.
I don't play on flying to Iran anytime soon so my butthole is safe.
Oh, I got it. Definitely was a woman or his troll game is out of this world haha.
For real, I cannot tell you how much I hate it when someone who literally feels bad about accidentally killing a fly is okay with a baby's brain being ripped apart because of "muh women's choice." Just makes my blood boil. Then the utter ignorance of "Japan did not need to be invaded" disgusting.
You ever debated a liberal? You know the thing where they just keep asking questions instead of following their own logic, yeah that was her.
The thing that struck me was that it was like out of one propaganda machine into another. Imagine Reddit is your only news on the USA and you already do not like them.
What did it sound like someone you know!? No that was not her name.
70 yr old mulllah does a great voice impression lol
We cannot let that happen that would spell disaster for the world. Who takes our place China? Russia? India? Do you think any of those places would respect your freedom? Well, they would probably just kill you if you are American, but places like Hong Kong, Singapore? Good luck. Eastern Europe? good luck. Israel? Good luck. This really is the election of our generation!
Can the votes be changed there??
Are you talking to yourself? You have no counter-argument. You are so delusional it is scary.
Okay so you are for giving people rights over things they do nothing for, you know what responsibility without authority is called? AKA, having to contribute to the system and support dependents while they decide what your rights should be? Slavery. I do not just disagree with you but I find you disgusting, I spit on your grave. You are no different to me than a communist taking my rights away for the greater good.
Still no argument, just you are wrong, wow such impressive logic, I gave you fair chance to hear you how, and you know what? You actually convinced me of the opposite of position even more. Okay well, I guess you are just going to continue to say I am flawed and you are right with no backing. Or is "we had slavery" too an attempt at putting forth an argument? Hilarious shows your ineptitude. I am not interested in engaging with you if the best you can do is but but but women should have all the rights men have because that is fair. You sound like a religious zealot who refuses to inspect your dearly held beliefs.
Saying that does not make it true when you have done zero to back that statement up. If anything you are the one shifting.
If you want to think of the home as a collective place, the taxpayers are not the owners but contributors. If you want to live in the house, fine, but if you want a say in how collective money is spent, you better contribute. No, you do not understand, and you say you did quite well is showing you lack of perspective. You are twisting it to mean what you want it to. How am I changing the subject? Women have a right to vote, yes, but I think it is flawed. Why I think women should be able to vote is not in any way an unrelated issue. Do I need to lay out my position plainly?
Giving women the right to vote was a mistake. The shift to the left is a direct result of this as women as a group require men to survive, they are not equal biologically. No, that does not make them worthless and that they have no rights, rights are made up by the way. They cost more, and they produce less in terms of money and products. They do produce children which I think is very valuable but the state should not subsidize that. Historical precedent gives us a good idea of why things were the way they were, voting was connected to something more than an arbitrary age. It is that way now but I think it is wrong.
As I understand your position, you think women should have voting rights just like men based on a certain age we just decide. You're supporting this reasoning with the idea that women are equal to men just like black people are equal to white people. You seem to support voting rights based on just age and maturity that we decide. I think you are wrong, dead wrong. Please correct me if I have misconstrued your position.
And that is not what I was arguing, I am saying that giving women the right to vote was a mistake.
I should say trending, the vast majority are still simps, but it is a complex issue.
Even liberal men do not put up with women as much, I think it has to do with the ease of sexual gratification without women, and also hookups nowadays. That is why I do not support bans on porn etc.
In general, but technology eases the burden. Imagine raising a baby without all the cool stuff we have nowadays.
That is something I haven't considered, that could actually be a major factor in why men cost more.
Learn to take someone else's view. Everyone's self-interest is not the same. Do you really blame women? Or the men who allow that?
It makes me very sad what happened in vietnam.