I tried looking for a follow-up but could only get articles about conspiracy theorists having dangerous new content out of this video.
He hired them but I don't blame him. He acted unimpeachably, bringing in the most reputable (in DC) scientific advisors for a delicate moment in history. But, as usual, everyone was a traitor and useless in their job.
Putin, who thinks democracy can't function in a in ever an a ever complexing world.
One of them even said they didn't want to interrupt.
Disgusting.
Will he be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for crimes against humanity?
When the plagiarist dies and Harris assumes the illegal presidency, who will she pick as VP? Hillary, perhaps?
A short while later, who will Hillary pick as VP?
Trump vote goes in, Biden vote comes out.
You can't explain that!
Time moved slower.
Neighbors were familiar.
The Internet was best as a niche for the minimally tech-savvy. There was a small barrier to entry. You wouldn't just find yourself on the Internet with nothing to do, ready to scroll.
Reading stuff on the Internet was ridiculed. Now when a person cites a book there is someone to correct him based off what Wikipedia says.
International pen-pals. Letters in general. Why write a few paragraphs of worthy thoughts and come back the next day to decide whether to send it? Can't talk like that online. TL;DR. Your response is expected within the minute.
The great information highway has devolved according to the lowest common denominator, adapting to support the basest of social instincts while inflaming them for increased user engagement. Try searching for slightly obscure or independent material like in the Web 2.0 days. You'll find the search engine has determined via the AI that you actually meant what the half a million others who searched for a similar query meant to find. It's all the same websites: Forbes, WaPo, Quora, e-How, and Buzzfeed with their circularly-plagiarised listicles.
I skimmed through it. Summary: questions about how to hold Trump accountable, how to undo the 'damage' best president did, and tame policy questions of the vein never asked during the past four years. Some backhand (toward Pres. Trump) softballs like 'are you going to support the president or uphold the truth'. The answers by the press secretary were political and vague. It is going to be the same from now on so that's the last I'll watch of it.
Do they have little robotic arms to wave them at the applause signal?
Every advisor who, for whatever faults they had, gave innovative or shrewd advice was methodically targeted by the media and the rest of the deep state until they stepped down and were made ineligible to advise again. Bannon, Flynn, Stone, Manafort, etc. This is also out of the Art of War: if you cannot get Trump directly then get his allies.
"I'm not doing anything wrong."
According to the current times. It did not used to be wrong to teach there are only two genders.
"I have nothing to hide."
Assuming nothing you do or write will be interpreted differently by your overlord.
I've been using this:
https://www.4kdownload.com/products/product-videodownloader
Set-up smart mode to determine what quality you want to download in, where to save, subtitles, etc. and paste the video URL into the program. If you have a lot of videos, you can put them into a list like in Word or Notepad and paste the whole list into the downloader.
Don't ask questions, just produce product and then get excited for next production.
Nothing on a Windows machine is secure. Browsers like Iridium stymie the flow but you'll have to do a bit of research to make something fairly secure. It is all about the effort required to uncover you. You are secure from the people you have made your data too hard to access to be worth it to them. Others, like dedicated government, I can't say there is any security to be had with modern electronics at all. Even speakers can be used as microphones. Still, do the research. You may as well make them work for it. Here is a link you may find surprising if you're on Windows.
https://account.microsoft.com/privacy/activity-history?view=usage
If you press Alt and F4 at the same time a wild pepe appears on your screen!
Good image. I have seen in recent months an uptick of proponents of the argument that people should not think for themselves. No spin or irony; flat out Hillary interpretation of 1984 belief in authority.
I understand that if you are not an expert you can say you do not know, and that on some subjects you essentially roll the dice with which expert you decide to trust (there are, in fact, different ones that those who appear in state media). But even this is being considered 'irresponsible,' with the responsible thing being to transform oneself into a repeater/mouthpiece for state-approved experts (e.g. Fauci instead of Bhakdi).
There are attempts to shame people: "so you're one of those people who thinks for themselves". This was unheard of only a few years ago (at least in my experience). Criticism only went so far as to say that a person is not thinking for themselves well not at all.
Refresh the page and try again.
Gotta win fast!
http://swisscows.com/ is another option.
She says all this in a relaxed tone because there is no skin in the game. She is okay on her salary and in her position. It is a luxury to criticize the bill. Because she is not personally impacted by a bad bill she is not furious and fighting the bill with every measure possible. Just voting against, and saying "that's no good" when it passes. Onto the next issue.
Credit to u/alloffoglesfootlong for the format.