Yes, we don't have to be the gentlemen all the time.
amy coney barrett
scoop count intensifies!!!!!!!
So what if other parents are unhappy because their kids don't get to have such a good spirited dad?
This is an A+ meme execution!
Homeschooling is the answer
I also highly value homeschooling, despite ending up not going with that all way.
with their whole family behind them?
This is why being a meaningful parent instead of a transactional one is important. But this is up to each individual.
Nothing wrong with getting the best education possible and ending up a plumber.
Very true.
For you to be right, you may also assume that I am not a person at all. Perhaps maybe even just a centipede pretending to be a human online.
It's OK to be stupid as long as you strive to better yourself instead of trying to ooze everyone else with it. Take this advice and win life.
all our lives depend on it
Maybe in highly hierarchical societies, like in Asia but in the US? Nah. Blue collar jobs can provide you with a decent living and there's no huge social stigma (and you can include the IT sector in that, as there's no hard degree requirements, you just need the skills).
His style?????
You mean there's an army of high level, high power patriots who want so much to go and tackle all the little issues but mean ol' GEOTUS barrs them (pun intended) to get all the work done himself, because ... well, he's so relaxed and bored?
Banning is too strong a word.
Have you been stupid from birth or did an accident happen during your lifetime?
Don't be a weasel Democrat. Of course it's banning and of course we support it. Or perhaps you also think that the MSM and Internet Masters of the Universe aren't persecuting Conservatives in a coordinated "Great wall of Democrats in the United States".
^ this guy sciences.
Yes. The softer, the uglier. But we must note that "postmodern cultural studies" doesn't even qualify as soft science. More like shit.
it's legitimate and accurate if there are no peers reviewing it
That's not how it works. "peers" don't validate or pontificate on your shit, they make sure you don't have gross nonsense in the thing that goes out.
Congratulations, you made the right choice.
I was there before the internet. Stupidity was high as fuck, make no mistake about it. At least now, you have the chance to access the information directly. It's a huge YUUUUUUUUGE win.
^ this guy has touched a rotary phone.
So, is the DMV is charge of the elections process now?
The source part killed me :D
Doesn't what you wrote strongly reinforce my argument?
China has capital. So unless we're talking about WWII levels of mobilization, don't count on that.
bet he's compensating
Why yes, I am indeed. Are you also dating a model?
You're extremely dull dude.
Can a bidet recognize - much less admire - the Mona Lisa?
All I was saying is that you're a faggot for saying that.
How did that work out for you? I mean, apart from getting a mental masturbation reward for displaying your silliness.
My comment has nothing to do with my level of understanding of libertarianism.
Oh really? Had you the capacity to not be a mere third-rate foot soldier, wouldn't that cognitive level of ability prevent you from spewing nonsense?
You called him a bootlicker because he said he wants the government to do something about social media.
See, here's the thing. My position was not that and it was clearly expressed so. It is extremely interesting that you still haven't been able to see this. Are you not familiar with the art of reading comprehension?
copypasta
I am not familiar with the use of copypasta, as I actually use my brain every moment. But you certainly seem very familiar with said pasta, who could ever take a guess as to why...
when nothing I've said has anything to do with how little or how much I understand the deeply complex, nuanced interworkings of the sophisticated political ideology of libertarianism.
It oozes. Just like one doesn't put a tractor on the racing track. Ain't nobody expecting you to actually .... race.
All I did was call you a douche for calling him a bootlicker.
That part is OK. You're free to have your own opinions, regardless of how detached they are from reality.
I don't understand what you're even arguing.
Yes. That was my point from the start. You didn't understand at all. But that's fine. It's now your turn to think hard on why this is so and fix it.
I'm not FOR libertarianism.
You yourself said you were. So obviously I was referring to people like your past self who spout nonsensical slogans without understanding. Sure, those things come from some legitimate arguments but all the way down the food-chain they get perverted into easily disprovable silliness. Like "the state produces nothing" slogan back in the day.
Rick And Morty
Looks like even you know how ... high your level is.
Don't care if you don't believe me on my history as a libertarian.
Not only did I believe it, my whole response was based on believing your claim.
Rothbard, RP, Tom Woods, Jason Stapleton, Herman-Hoppe, some of my favorites for various reasons.
Does being a fan equate with actual understanding? Of course not. Libertarianism is a demanding topic to understand. Regurgitating slogans is easy. Just like how I'm an expert basketball player by watching my NBA heroes.
Even if I did misunderstand your argument, what does that have to do with him "claiming all that shit about libertarians"?
He was arguing about things that were not libertarian positions, but are easily confused as such. Why are they confused in that way? Because when you misunderstand things and say nonsense while fervently claiming to be for libertarinism, why would he doubt that what you say is the cannon?
Even if I was pretending to be a former libertarian
I didn't doubt at all that you were indeed.
I was a cringe libertarian once
You shaved off the libertarian part but it should have been the cringe part instead.
Pythagoras reincarnation confirmed