It is easy to please inane people. But the real thing is that I myself am a true philozoist. I wouldn't have let you go to bed crying, would I?
Dude, honest question: how can you live with yourself being so lightweight?
At this point, let's just throw your response away wholesale. It's THAT bad. I get it that you're blowing steam and don't care (or have the capacity) to use actual reason in your thought process, but this doesn't include some kind of responsibility on my end to fix you.
If you ever manage to overcome this, come back, re-quote my previous post and I'll be happy to entertain you.
We have antitrust laws, as you said, so obviously I'm talking about using the ones we have.
And who exactly is responsible (and actually has the power) to use those laws? You, me or the government?
So what happens is that your government God fails you and instead of getting pissed at it (since you're powerless and being powerless isn't a great feeling), you lash out to people who are also powerless in enforcing ANY law.
Libertarians are the people who like to say "muh private company, they can do whatever they want, free market lol".
No. That's what the left says when they want to use companies to go after individuals. The libertarian position is that the government should minimally exist (or, in the case of ancap - not exist at all).
Do you see the difference? I wouldn't bet on it so I'll expand on it.
We don't live in a world where government is minimal. So we can't just pretend it doesn't exist. Even though for example the government DOES have a monopoly in laying roads, we don't go "well, we're not gonna use roads until we force the government to lose its monopoly". Do we? Of course not. Same thing with the laws. We would absolutely love to have the power to change them and we are against any laws that enlarge the government but that doesn't mean that existing laws shouldn't be used until the balance of power (hopefully) brings change.
The party of science, people. They have no shame.
Well, you could first pull your head out of your ass and see the light.
There's a ton of existing laws that the government - should it wish to - could invoke to manhandle FB.
Does the government invoke said laws? No. Why not? You know damn well why not.
And what's your solution to that? "MuH mOre LaWs". That will certainly work THIS time!
That too works!
Is this real or rumors?
Awareness first, bill when it's gotten traction. We've had enough theatrics.
"Only Rosie O'Donnell."
(heartfelt thunderous laughter)
(panic mode) "No, no there were more."
(low, "yeah right" voice) "Yes, I'm sure".
Well, this is OK.
- People who have no exposure to this info get some.
- QTards get their daily dose of mental masturbation.
- MSM keeps harping on QTards.
- More people who have no exposure to this stuff start getting a small red pill.
- Eventually some wake up to more stuff of reality.
- Train is always available for loading more.
Like what?
Yes, but that's how sick people die in general. You go to the hospital with a some serious illness, you get infected by something else and you die from the complications because your body was very weak. Some people from this pool may have died because the "something" happened to be Covid. Which is to be expected. The serious (in terms of how dangerous the virus is) part is about those who basically didn't have a serious preexisting condition.
Doesn't matter, we'll take any vote.
Chill Beavis, your IQ is plummeting in the first quartile again. How about you come up with some interesting comeback instead of bottom of the barrel stuff?
Your hypothetical doesn't indicate level of scumminess
Well, there's a reason for that. I am wondering what people think is supreme.
- The Law, i.e. due process.
- Authorized gangs of people shooting at their convenience "because he deserved it".
THE NEXT PRESIDENT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THREE, FOUR, MAYBE MAYBE MAYBE 5 SUPREME JUSTICES.
(lowers volume a bit)
YOU BETTER VOTE FOR ME.
:D :D
On fire!!!!!!!!
TONIGHT I'M IN NH AND WE CAN WING IT!
IS THERE ANYBODY IN THIS PLACE THAT ENJOYS BURNING THE AMERICAN FLAG?
YOU KNOW WHAT I SAY?
PROTESTERS YOUR ASS
I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT MY ASS
:D :D :D :D :D
He's on fire!
(reading from script) ....Biden
(pauses, script goes out of the window) BY THE WAY IT'S NOT BIDEN ...
THEY TELL HIM WHAT TO DO .... IT'S HIS MASTERS
REMEMBER THE IDIOT FROM CNN
:D :D :D
WE'GONNA WIN
DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY DOUBT?
THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION IN OUR HISTORY
Thank you for your reasonable exposition.
The average 17 year old male from a few generations ago was mentally and physically strong, so much so that that average man would be an alpha male by today's standards. But bad parenting has created beta men, and one aspect of that parenting was telling young men that "they need time to grow" or "you're perfect just as you are" or other such lies.
This is very true.
To be so strong is now the exception, but it used to be the rule.
Maybe. But there's also a ton of hype about it. Just like there's a ton of hype about whites being evil etc etc. But we all know that hype isn't reality. I find it very low effort on the part of the original poster to just use generalizations the way he did.
This is why libertarianism is getting a bad rep. Anybody can claim to be one without having to meet any criteria. Take you for example:
If that's what you really understood about what I actually argued, is it any wonder that he's claiming all that shit about libertarians?