4
Au_contrarian 4 points ago +4 / -0

They'll claim it was a doctored video because the audio was inauthentic. And they'll say it with a straight face.

2
Au_contrarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

In retrospect, Cobra was already pretty gay.

2
Au_contrarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

14<14.5=sex registry, right?

2
Au_contrarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah but now you have 15 year olds ending up on the registry for sex with a 14 year old. I don't think we're disagreeing really, just fiddling with details. Not a flat 10 years certainly.

4
Au_contrarian 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yeah I agree that there should be some exceptions, like 18 year old with 17 year old and things like that, but a flat 10 years is a strange way of calculating. I thought prevailing wisdom was you take the age of the younger person, multiply by two and subtract 7 to find the maximum age of a sexual partner. Now they have it so a 20 year old doesn't have to register because they only had sex with a 10 year old? Bizarre.

5
Au_contrarian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Been a Nats fan for a decade. Tuned in to opening day and saw BLM painted on the pitcher's mound. Turned it off and haven't tuned in since. Not sure if I ever will. Went from winning the world series to completely alienating me in a matter of months.

17
Au_contrarian 17 points ago +17 / -0

His gut reaction to people that disagree with him is to ridicule and attack them. We see it time and time again from him, and it's dimwitted. It shows an inability to see the world from the point of view of your opponents, a hallmark of the radical left. He's also incapable of just ignoring this guy. If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to agitate him.

29
Au_contrarian 29 points ago +29 / -0

Exactly. He is no longer judgment proof.

4
Au_contrarian 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought for sure that sending letters to Donald Trump that pander to the protesters would pacify them. Does he have any more bright ideas?

2
Au_contrarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the difference between Trump's hair and a wet raccoon? https://youtu.be/YZ1FadRTtSc

18
Au_contrarian 18 points ago +18 / -0

Yeah, Rand isn't suddenly tuned in because he's being attacked. He's OG.

3
Au_contrarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you are libertarian and vote for Joe Biden you are not a libertarian. Call it hypocrisy, ignorance, or being an intentional liar. These people do not represent libertarians. The Libertarian party is on a path to devolving into a cesspool of disaffected voters with no coherent theory of government.

8
Au_contrarian 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes, as a libertarian and former Ron Paul guy, I do not understand how you can be "Anti-Trump." At the extreme, you could agree with him on most of his policy accomplishments, disagree on some, and maybe not vote for him because you are idealistic. But there is zero reason to be advocating against Trump the man. He is winning an important culture war, after all. I cheer him when he gets it right and I'm an ally.

32
Au_contrarian 32 points ago +32 / -0

I'm a Harry Browne / Ron Paul style libertarian. Not a Jo Jorgensen woke libertarian. Libertarians are devolving into a landing pad for disaffected voters with no real theory of government. I can tell you that I support Trump when he gets it right and am not like this meme. Whether people like me vote for Trump is more a function of where you fall on the idealistic / pragmatic spectrum, but I cheer Trump when he gets it right on policy. Libertarians are your allies.

3
Au_contrarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are going to be a couple of Libertarian camps, ones that will vote for the two parties and those that won't no matter what. I can understand both sides because some people are unwilling to compromise their ideals, while some are more pragmatic. But speaking as a libertarian, I always support Trump when he gets it right, and I think most are that way.

9
Au_contrarian 9 points ago +9 / -0

No, the statute has an exception for long guns. It was legal.

3
Au_contrarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

948.60(3)(c) reads (my annotations in [brackets]):

"(c) This section [meaning the entirety of section 948.60] applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 [relating to short-barrel guns] or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 [prohibition against persons under 16] and 29.593 [prohibition against hunting without a license]."

So literally 948.60 does not apply, including subsection 948.60(2)(a) that you quote.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›