2
Au_contrarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sports is supposed to bring us together and politics is supposed to divide us. Clown world.

2
Au_contrarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't be mad at the Phillies. Harper kept his promise and helped bring a world series championship to DC.

1
Au_contrarian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently they had a choice between this or "united for change." The Nats opted for BLM.

8
Au_contrarian 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm a Nats fan and turned it off as soon as I saw the BLM logo painted on the mound.

33
Au_contrarian 33 points ago +33 / -0

I can't even tell what's real anymore.

2
Au_contrarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I definitely distinguish between the two, even if on occasion I have difficulty determining the person's national identity just by looking at them (not sure how that can possibly be the standard we need to meet). The lady in the top right of the video looks ethnically Chinese and not Korean. Did I get it correct?

0
Au_contrarian 0 points ago +1 / -1

Forwards from grandma.

1
Au_contrarian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not the theory of injury that she was soliciting in the video. Theoretically you could have a class action on the basis that donors were all defrauded, but I doubt you'll find many voluntary class members.

2
Au_contrarian 2 points ago +3 / -1

Class action won't stick. It has to do with what's required to certify a class, need a population of similarly injured plaintiffs - like people who own a defective product or maybe own a stock whose price was unlawfully manipulated, etc.

1
Au_contrarian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine forgetting that trillions of dollars in debt existed because you had one year of tax revenue surplus. The USA is never paying you back, suckers. We don't even understand the nature of owing money.

18
Au_contrarian 18 points ago +18 / -0

The only thing toxic that will concern your opponents will be your masculinity.

6
Au_contrarian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Remember never to provide police officers with admissions against your interest, such as telling them you know why they pulled you over or telling them how fast you were going. These types of statements are an exception to the general rule that hearsay is inadmissible, so admitting your guilt can be used against you in court. Good answers to "Do you know why I pulled you over" are "I'm not sure, officer." "Do you know how fast you were going?" "I was watching out for traffic, I wasn't looking down at my speedometer."

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›