Well, I never really felt bad or had any health issues before I started taking them, so any changes would be harder to notice.
Oh I also take bodease, forgot to mention that in the original comment. I think maybe soreness from doing a bunch of outside work seems to last a shorter period of time, but could just be my imagination.
Can't Pence just deny the electoral votes of any states that violated the constitution in choosing those electors?
It's be like a bunch of us just getting together and deciding which electors to send. If the electors we choose weren't chosen based on the constitution, thirst electors should just be ignored and only the ones sent via the constitutional process should be counted.
The rules of the election being changed by people other than the legislator completely invalidate the election. Couldn't some random judge just decide the election is going to be redone, but it had to be over in 2 minutes so the judge is the only one that got to vote and then he counts his vote and says that now all the electors go for Trump? It's be just as valid as what was already done extralegislatively.
There is still all this individual state stuff going on which everyone was optimistic about. The Texas thing came and went and we still have all the individual state stuff going on, so what happened to the original optimism for the individual state stuff?
I've had the idea for years that most of the media and politicians are compromised and controlled in some way with videos of terrible things they did or evidence of crimes they committed. Recent events just affirm that idea further.
The case wasn't asking the scotus to install a president. It was simply asking the scotus to tell the defendant states that their election violated the constitution because the changes made to the election process did not go through the legislator and the state legislators will need to decide their delegates and not the unconstitutional elections they held.
I heard on the Alex Jones show that the placebo was the meningitis vaccine and they chose that as the placebo because it had some bad side effects and then can say their new vaccine didn't have any worse side effects than the placebo.
Did the founders even intend on the popular vote in a state to determine the electors? Isn't the decision supposed to be by the legislators themselves originally and they just delegated that responsibility to the popular vote?
If the elected legislators decided on the delegates instead of voting, then it world be similar to what you propose, because the state legislators would be elected by the popular votes of different regions of the state.
I don't care who developed it, still won't take it.
Also, which vaccine? Aren't there were several? Did she develop all of them or something? Or are they just attributing it to her to virtue signal? You know, not like a bunch of people were involved in its development or anything.
This meme confuses me.