This is an 86-page book, and already on page 2 you can understand fully what he wanted:
Us communists, for years, we have fought not only for the political and economical revolution of China, but also for its cultural revolution; the goal of all those fights is to build a new society and a new State for the Chinese people. In this new society and this new State, not only will there be new policies and a new economy, but also a new culture; that is to say we want to transform the politically oppressed and economically exploited China in a politically free and economically prosperous China; moreover, we want to transform the ignorant and backward China under the domination of the old culture in an enlightened and progressist China under the domination of the new culture. Build a new culture of the Chinese people, such is our goal in the cultural domain.
Politics is downstream of culture. This is agreed upon right after this extract, with the caveat that a determined culture (as an ideology) is reflected by the political system and the economy of a determined society.
Communists seek to change the culture of the host country. Anyone who thinks communist culture and American culture can coexist is outright uneducated on what at least one of them is, if not both.
That's it for me, back to reading.
HIV is still around despite constant reminders it's present and reminders to protect yourself. It has a treatment now, and the promise of a working vaccine decades after the virus was first discovered.
Still, should we have been mandated to wear a rubber at all time against HIV? Should have we stopped procreating altogether because "anyone can have it", "locking down" on population generation, leading to aging of the population and its issues until "the vaccine"? Should we have needed to hide the pregnant wife, tell that an unprotected act happened and potentially transmitted HIV, which would be a clear violation of a government decree "for your safety"? That would have been just nuts. Hopefully today we know HIV well, we have accurate tests and treatments allowing seropositive people to live normal lives. Know what happened? Science happened.
However now we are suffering a "social distancing" order that forbids people from socializing from fear of the ChinaVirus, stopping people from getting together and eventually making babies. Granted, we don't know much about the ChinaVirus, yet there is a lobby and its useful idiots pushing to wait for "the vaccine" and rejecting available, cheap and safe treatments that tend to prove effective when taken early (like HCQ + AZ + Zn) in favor of expensive other treatments (Remdesivir, ventilators) that have yet to show better results. Not only doesn't that lobby know much more than we do, but it will have its useful idiots lash out at science should it prove contrary to their beliefs.
We are in effect on a population generation lockdown.
I was watching this video and at 5:19 you can hear the DA Paul Howard say "Mr. Brooks never presented himself as a threat".
A threat to whom may I ask? The officers? The guy was DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE! He was a threat to others to begin with!
"At the very beginning he was peacefully sleeping in his car" The very beginning was WAY BEFORE the officers even interacted with him, bucko!
Because of him, an officer is about to face the death penalty for doing his job and defending himself!
Sorry, I'm venting here because the comments are disabled. I just can't believe such a piece of garbage is a DA. I fear this will only lead to more officers quitting, and more lawlessness.
Fuck, I'm not even American and this kind of "lassez-faire" culture being approved by the people responsible for law enforcement manages to drive me nuts. I know this kind of shit will come knocking at my door someday.
