2
Axegrinder 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wasn't given a receipt. Just an "I voted" sticker. i asked if a printout was available with my vote on it, and I was told no.

4
Axegrinder 4 points ago +4 / -0

We can just fake them. I mean if democrats can produce fake ballots, we can produce those.

64
Axegrinder 64 points ago +64 / -0

As both a teacher and parent of a daughter. I don't give a flying fuck what Biden or Schumer want. I will physically keep that from happening at my school. Period.

2
Axegrinder 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only thing I can think of is that if the DOJ were investigating he isn't supposed to talk about ongoing investigations. Also, it could give the appearance of weaponizing the DOJ against a political opponent. That being said, he should have just kept his mouth shut or resign if he isn't up for the job. Also the DOJ doesn't investigate election fraud, the DHS does.

1
Axegrinder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, thanks.

1
Axegrinder 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think there are two. One clip is about swing states, the other is about the state legislatures. I could be wrong though.

3
Axegrinder 3 points ago +3 / -0

"found out highly suspicious " ; should "out" be "it"? ;

" skeptical on what" ; try "skeptical of"

"Utilize article II..." ; try "by using article II and correcting this now we can not only prevent a stolen election but also restore faith in our election system and those responsible for securing elections in the future"

Great letter! Just offering suggestions, yours read well and the point was made. Good luck.

3
Axegrinder 3 points ago +3 / -0

I love Nash economics. I agree but with option C it's going to take a lot of political or judicial courage. I can only hope that the right people are up for doing what is not only just but imperative to save our country.

15
Axegrinder 15 points ago +15 / -0

The funny thing I keep hearing from libs is that "this isn't court". It doesn't have to be, the legislature can simply say the election was bullshit and send the electors they want. LOL. It's hilarious.

by xparnie
6
Axegrinder 6 points ago +6 / -0

Discovery means that both sides have to reveal witnesses and evidence that will be introduced at a trial. They can depose witnesses, under oath. That means the voters would have to turn over all of the voting data to prove Pres. Trump violated their rights. When they do that all of the fraud would be exposed. Not only would they lose but it could lead to all of their votes being tossed by the court and Trump would win Michigan.

by xparnie
26
Axegrinder 26 points ago +26 / -0

Guess they don't know what discovery will do to them.

12
Axegrinder 12 points ago +12 / -0

Nice to look at for sure and a killer to boot.

1
Axegrinder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, he is just saying it's wasted energy. We can bust Tucker after we win this thing. I don't care what Tucker says or Fox. The truth is the truth, if they want to jump on the liberal bandwagon and be proven false later, then they can reap the whirlwind then too. I don't watch any MSM anymore.

8
Axegrinder 8 points ago +8 / -0

Looks similar to the one I voted on which was dominion.

1
Axegrinder 1 point ago +1 / -0

This goes to the canvassers from the other night. Even though they gave in because of the threats and if the certification holds up (it shouldn't) it goes to the state canvassers. The state canvassers are also 2-2 Rep / Dem. So if they refuse to certify- they should-then it then goes to the MI Legislature. They can re-file a lawsuit or new lawsuits based on newly discovered material.

1
Axegrinder 1 point ago +1 / -0

She's a personal injury lawyer, I think. I believe by doing this it will be grounds for the courts and legislature to step in and either refuse to certify, throw out the ballots or force them to allow observers. She is terrified of the truth being found. She's an obvious bitch.

1
Axegrinder 1 point ago +2 / -1

I want to steal this.

5
Axegrinder 5 points ago +5 / -0

Watching, that Mark Thomsen dude is afraid of his county getting audited. He has something to hide.

9
Axegrinder 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes! it's scary how accurate he is.

view more: Next ›