Why does this sound so much like a deep fake???
This would mean that he would be declaring the current crowd at Congress "insurgents". He would be declaring the Insurrection Act on his own people. Won't happen.
It's always tomorrow for Lin Wood. That means another paycheck.
I'm here for the long haul brother!
Sadly it looks like people are jumping ship in droves. We need a big win ASAP to keep this site alive.
FUCK OFF DOOMER!!!
Lin Wood is all fucking talk.
Attorney here:
Denied for lack of standing, only Alito and Thomas in opposition. Case is dead.
They are being sued so they file in opposition.
This is, you are correct. This is the response to the Republican Party of PA asking for a Writ of Certiorari to the SCOTUS. Not sure why you are being downvoted. FUCKING READ THE BRIEF!!!
Why do people keep sharing this? It's obviously from before the election...
Attorney here:
Appellate courts do not hear any new evidence, your only chance to present evidence is at the trial court level. Appellate courts only decide if the lower courts made errors.
They know this. I'm no legal genius, this is basic knowledge for anyone that went to law school and has been practicing for at least a few years.
For doing what?
"I guarantee you no lawyer wants to besmirch his own legal reputation just to make a few extra bucks."
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Sorry but I'm an attorney and this is a total LARP. From the very beginning:
"Where they will rule that the election is invalid due to fraud or mistakes on a countrywide scale."
SCOTUS doesn't do this kind of fact finding and ruling, they will rule on why the lower court, either the lower Federal Appellate Court or State Supreme Court was correct or incorrect in their ruling. So far the PA case is the only one that has potential (as of today) to go to SCOTUS. In every other state, the shit bag lawyers working for Trump have been a true embarrassment.
What's your point? Or is this just meant as a history lesson...
In the U.S. it's illegal to vote on elections, though you still can through some somewhat shady betting sites. That being said, since the bet is illegal, you would be SOL completely.
As for other countries, not sure, it would depend on their local laws.
I appreciate it.
I'm sorry, I don't quite follow what you mean by that statement.
I think the Trump admin did what it could. States use different systems to verify ballots so it's hard to know until the actual election if there is any fraud happening. It's also hard to take legal action when the only evidence of pre-election fraud are videos or witness accounts that are hard to verify if not impossible.
I'll use an example from person experience. My parents live in Missouri which allowed mail in voting and absentee voting, whereas before they only allowed absentee and you needed a sworn valid reason that you could not vote in person. For the mail in vote, you only needed to say that you wanted to mail in your vote. However, that ballot envelope needed to be signed AND notarized prior to mailing, meaning a notary needs to check to see if you have a valid ID and if you are indeed the person voting, so that was secure. However, I know of TONS of people who chose to vote absentee and simply lied about the reason they could not vote in person, most of which stated they were not going to be at their normal residence on voting day. Legally, that IS voted fraud, and that is not a legal vote. But, once that ballot is cast, it's now impossible to trace back to the person that cast it. And no prosecutor is going to go through the trouble of prosecuting someone for what most juries would view as a "technicality".
Yes, but this was about a conflict related to when votes could be counted, not about the overlying issue of voter fraud. And so far as it stands, PA did right by SCOTUS by simply segregating ballots received after election night. (Please correct me if I'm wrong, I haven't read a huge amount on this case).
JK Moving? Meaning JUST KIDDING!!!