Correct, and they could theoretically all be solved in Trump's favor and never need to get to SCOTUS, but they could also all get resolved locally and not go in Trump's favor, or any other combination of those. My main point I guess that I'm getting at is that this is extremely complicated and not just as clear as "Trump will win at SCOTUS."
Given the dissimilarities between Bush v. Gore, and also the dissimilarities between the allegations in each sate, I have no idea what the remedy could be, and that's precisely why I feel that SCOTUS would be unable to make a blanket ruling that would "fix" each state's issue. But we'll see, this is an exciting time to get to see the legal system unfolding.
Trump would still be the 45th President his 2nd term....
Michigan and Arizona. If Biden gets Nevada that's 270, no need for PA. FUCK!!!
They absolutely can. Republicans control the senate and they can speed up the process as much as they want.
Never installed it because I'm not a Zoomer moron. Those cucks are either not voting or voting for Biden, so fuck them and their little video app.
As the census law currently stands, everyone living in the US is supposed to fill it out, even illegals.
Have you had your identity confirmed by the mods or can you post a pic to prove its you so we are sure it's not just someone LARPing?
Yes, first offense misdemeanor and second a felony.
Oh shit, I had forgotten about that one! Damn, lol.
Is your friend not an adult? lol.
Solid defense! :)
Bro it's the 22nd Amendment...
Cool analysis, but he's not an attorney. I would take anything these wannabe lawyers say with a grain of salt.
That was Bambajan Bamba. Chadwick was born in South Carolina...
What? When did China claim it originated in the U.S.? Source?
What do you think should be done?
The U.S. Supreme Court in the 1898 case "United States v. Wong Kim Ark" ruled that anyone born on U.S. soil is a natural born U.S. Citizen. Articles like this piss me off because they either:
-
Have no idea what caselaw is do no know that current law is based on current SCOTUS interpretation of the Constitution. Or,
-
Make conclusions based on what they think the law "should" be. For example, saying "anchor babies should not be U.S. Citizens" is an opinion, but it does not reflect the current law.
Watching her recent videos and she's deeply anti-Trump. Delete this pede.
Uuugh, that's not a black man...
"They'll come in and arrest an entire county election board, if it is warranted. Suddenly, the cost, time and resources needed to battle individual districts or states evaporates when the feds start emptying election offices."
I have yet to see in any administration in recent history anything close to this happening.