Yes, there have to be consequences for judicial overreach. At this point, it's targeted harassment.

Lower down in the webpage they show that it is 0.26%, not 26%. This was also verified by OANN (Trump tweet: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1336177638528983041). Chanel shows that the claim of 26% is a mistake; the original source says that it's 0.26%.

He said that it is more possible to get deals done between McConnell and Biden vs Pelosi and Trump. That isn't a betrayal.

They live in a world where the fraud might not be overturned. It's normal for them to consider what it would be like if Biden became president.

Exaggerated tweets like this will depress turnout.

Link to the facebook video: https://www.facebook.com/biggsforcongress/videos/823618361814642/

The table setup and covering is shown, but we don't know when the boxes got there. Doubt we need to prove that. It'd be funny if the boxes came from beneath the floor after the table was covered by the cloth.

Yeah, that video is a slam dunk for Georgia. Hope we can get similar videos for other states.

This one is good. It shows 4 camera angles at once.

This video is one where the female committee member keeps claiming the suitcase video is debunked even though this is the first time it's ever been shown.

Yes, the video here is from 11pm or so, which means the ballots would have been there all day or were sneaked in at some time after the table was setup. I do wish we could've seen all the clips but am grateful enough we have video evidence of fraudulent behavior.

Do not engage. OP had a post 5 days ago calling for WAR and has flipped.

It looks like a picture of a laptop with Internet Explorer opening an Excel spreadsheet.

I think the presumed context is that this is the laptop of the Dominion person who is helping to count (recount) ballots, but I wouldn't want to assume so.

There is a column for Check In Date with 11/25/20, and the bottom right time is 11/30/2020.

She's filed lawsuits, and some of them do contain significant evidence of fraud. Nothing big has happened because of them yet.

I have doubts when lawyers are so grandiose and public about their claims. Either she's got the information, or it's all hot air.

Very suspicious.

There is a rule against doxing; this person is not a public figure. The video itself may have recorded a crime, but we can hardly see anything in it. It is premature to conclude that what was recorded was election fraud. Questionable as it is, this could be standard procedure; the guy had no issue being recorded/watched by two observers.

With this level of information, it is fine to investigate further, but it is not worth ruining the guy's life.

He won by such a tiny margin; 339 votes (50.05% to 49.95%)

I wonder why she's not requesting a recount? Would Dem fraud be too obvious?

Can't really tell from this video. It could be anything, like manual examination of ballot images the machine couldn't read. We need more information than this.

We still don't have a good explanation for the boot switch. He claimed he was giving his "injured" leg a break. But why would he put the boot on his uninjured one?

Even though some states require consent for recordings, for situations like this, trustworthy actors would be tripping over themselves to secure that layer of accountability, transparency, competency, and legitimacy. It's just like the argument for police bodycams. Everyone should be happy to have recordings.

Why would anyone support such a frail person for president?

"We did it reddit..."

People are waking up!

60 minutes is biased, and everyone knew it'd be the least secure election ever.

Reluctantly agree. That may change in the second term, but so far, the corrupt are getting off easy.

This is a stretch. Joe having an ankle boot is suspicious, but Cindy McCain's photos are from 2019. Unless she's still wearing it a year later, these events do not seem related.

Larps are entertaining. You don't have to believe them; you only need to enjoy the ride.