1
Bachibazi_Solemani 1 point ago +1 / -0

I already understand what you are trying to do. I am telling you that you are accomplishing the opposite of what you claim to intend to accomplish. You are playing into your claimed enemy’s hands to the extent that it pretty much looks like you are an agent of your claimed enemy, to be honest. And while you’re doing it you are making other people look bad (but maybe that is your actual goal because it definitely looks like a distinct possibility).

If you are genuine, then you should try to focus on contemporary evidence for whatever you suspect rather than being totally attached to the most dead-on-arrival strategy possible (“Hitler good”). What do you not understand about this?

1
Bachibazi_Solemani 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly, I’m not entirely sure what you mean by “Son of God”; I assumed it was an idiosyncratic term of yours for Christian, but maybe it isn’t. What exactly you mean by Son of God?

It’s like I said, Nazi is a stupidly bad look at best. It’s a dumb hill to die on, even if everything you believe about history is correct. (Given the low standards and obvious brainwashy style of your “doc” I am quite skeptical.)

1
Bachibazi_Solemani 1 point ago +1 / -0

if that's what they're gona call me, I'll own it and make nazis look good instead of taking the easy way out and play the denial game

But why would they call you a Nazi in the first place? (Yes, I realize it is often general slander, but if you go around posting pro-Nazi videos a lot of people will think that’s a pretty apt description of you.) I’m glad to hear that you don’t want to be a Nazi, and I get what you’re going for, but I’m basically trying to give you a second opinion that things might not totally be coming across the way you imagine. Even though they will slander people as Nazis in order to bully them around, the strategy you suggest has a lot of negative side effects. For most people, even Jesus could not make the Nazis look good (not that he would try), so you are going to have a hard time with that. A better thing would be to say “I am most definitely not a Nazi“ and refuse to be bullied. Better yet, be like your favorite president and “condemn them totally.” You don’t need the Nazis In order to fight your enemy (again, I think if you look with fresh eyes you will realize that these videos are a trap).

It is definitely far superior to call yourself one who seeks to be a son of God. I understand that doesn’t go over well with certain circles. But maybe remember that when you give energy, as with charity, do not let your left hand know what your right hand gives: do it from the right spirit, and you don’t have to say why you do it. There may be occasions when it is right to state your spiritual disposition, and there may be times when it does more harm than good. Seeking to be a son of God is what I would consider to be a good “third way” which overcomes nazism, communism, and the greater evils that give them forth. Rather than a 12 hour video, remember one sentence, Romans 12:21: “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.”

1
Bachibazi_Solemani 1 point ago +1 / -0

Two of my presidents, not our presidents? Look you are pretty clear when pressed for clarification that you do not seek genocide; the problem is that most people won’t press for clarification. And, I don’t know, maybe you are not being forthright and that really is what you want. If the bankers are the enemy, you play into their hands by praising Hitler and calling yourself a Nazi. Every time you do this, they smile because it makes them safer. That’s why your enemy made a 12 hour long “doc” from a bunch of recycled video clips. Your enemy wants for there to be boogeyman Nazis in the world. But they are in such short supply that they have to be manufactured. Think about it. You just named a bunch of other people assassinated by your enemy. Why is your 12 hour “doc” about Hitler rather than Lincoln? (Hint: Lincoln would be more effective, and the people behind your “doc” want you to be as ineffective as possible.)

1
Bachibazi_Solemani 1 point ago +1 / -0

It isn’t about a personal fear of being called a name, it’s about a practical recognition of the fact that other people are swayed by names. It’s good that you are critically re-evaluating what you have been taught, but I suspect that your enemy is hedging their bets. Your enemy knows that some amount of people will wake up, so they want to use your waking up as an opportunity to adulterate your mind and disposition with bad, self-defeating ideas and tendencies. That way they still own you. Your enemy has made at least two layers of dreams; don’t get stuck in the second layer. If you say (as you suggested in your prior comment) that you are a nazi as some sort of act of defiance against the “parasite communists,” intending to take away the power of the word, then you are a part of that tribe whether you admit it to yourself or not. Your enemy wants to sow division; they want to use you so effectively that you imagine you are free and even fighting them. But if you call yourself a nazi and then associate with people who are fighting them in a better way, then you are actually serving your enemy by compromising the more effective front with all of your nazi baggage.

1
Bachibazi_Solemani 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hahaha... look bud, I don’t think it’s probably quite working out the way you imagine when you do that. The people just won’t let on about it. I laugh but I make mistakes like that in my own way; it happens to everyone one way or another. But I do think it is a mistake, and I can tell that you are sharp enough and determined enough to let it roll off of you when you realize it.

Your enemy is trying to sow division. Haven’t we read about this in history books?

I asked if you were European not to be exclusionary but because I really have seen a pattern of Euros promoting this “doc” and I wonder if it relates to a cultural disconnect. Where I’m from, you won’t win people over telling them you are a racist or a nazi. You need to find a “third way” that is neither nazism nor communism, a way which defeats them both. Like I said, I’m glad you’re rearing to fight and that you are doing your best to find your true enemy, but I think you may have reached some premature conclusions. It’s an easy thing to do; these tribes have a culture and that’s what ropes people in, be they nazis or commies or confederates or whatever. My response is: the answer these tribes have given you is not good enough; go find a better answer. Be a free man, Dan! Go make your own answer which is better. The tribes are package deals engineered to own you.

1
Bachibazi_Solemani 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Know your enemy“

That’s what I’m trying to tell you. Hitler was not a good man. Hitler would have had your Jewish friends murdered. Do you just get along with them fine, or are you also OK with them dying if it serves your end goal? I think that should be rhetorical. Hitler sold the Germans a bad package deal, and now your enemy is trying to sell you a 90-years stale caricature of it. Your enemy wants you in the clown show wearing a rainbow wig and a hackekruez fighting other clowns calling themselves antifa.

I can forgive people who get duped the first time around in history, but when we get the lazy modern version of history-repeats-itself (because the kleptocratic “elite” have degraded themselves with laziness, entitlement, and nepotism), it is harder to forgive. I know you’re obviously not in the “Trump is a Russian asset” tier of Repackaged-Red-Scare idiots, and I actually don’t think you are an idiot. And I think it’s good that you have the courage and will to try to fight genuinely evil things. That’s why it pains me to see you get duped by this.

Basically “pro-Hitler” is a self-defeatingly bad look. Even if you believe that Eisenhower and Patton were in on a plot to manufacture a hoax Holocaust or whatever (not saying you believe this, I’m just describing an intentionally preposterous extreme), you need to accept that that battle was lost and when you tell people you think Hitler was a good person, it isn’t going to sit well with people (for obvious reasons). And then you do it on a website for an American presidential candidate’s campaign (are you European? most people promoting this “doc” tend to be)... do you think that helps the campaign? (Hint: no, it fucking feeds into the preposterous smear that Trump supporters are Nazis.)

1
Bachibazi_Solemani 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, I’m not triggered. I just don’t like to see people duped into expending their good intentions in such a self-destructive way. The problem with this “documentary” is that it is a bad “package deal” (there are actually many problems, but this is a big-picture problem you might not take too harshly). There are definitely evil people in positions of power, so it is good that you are trying to fight them, but many of those evil people are not Jewish, and many of the ones who happen to be Jewish don’t give a damn about Jewish people and would be happy to have you turned into a modern-day caricature of a Nazi. So what happens is that there are maybe some important grains of truth sprinkled into the 12 hours, but it is also adulterated with a bunch of overt antisemetic garbage. So you buy the package for what you perceive to be the truth and take all the other garbage along with it. It’s propaganda and brainwashing. You should ask who it is that benefits by redirecting your energy in this way, and then you should ask what direction your energy could go in if it wasn’t being misdirected.

1
Bachibazi_Solemani 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s 12 hours because it’s supposed to brainwash you into being a nazi-variety useful idiot. The longer the video, the more brainwashing sessions you have to put in. There are many kinds of useful Idiots, and they have many different uses. Don’t become an idiot.

3
Bachibazi_Solemani 3 points ago +3 / -0

I dunno, remember when Lincoln put up a cardboard cutout of himself during the Lincoln-Douglas debates? We all said it was stately then. Oh wait, which clown world am I in?