$3?

I'm paying almost $4 for premium in VA. I don't even remember the last time I saw it around $2... Probably around November 2020 would be my guess.

Backing of the legal system, duh.

I'm not much of a religious person, but that was a good interview. Thanks for sharing

It's garbage owned by garbage man Mike Adams.

The only time I would be happy with a Twitter-like labeling of a news site as "misleading" because he's a holistic natural anti-modern medicine quack that doesn't deserve the ad revenue.

"Natural News", which is the source of this article, is owned by holistic kook Mike Adams. This article is shit and all of his sites should be taken with a giant grain of salt (or a mug of beer so you can swallow his bullshit)

Read my comment from another post, here: https://patriots.win/p/12i3udkOCi/x/c/4DyOSQAHp2K

Edit: Yeah this website is shit. Its owned by Mike Adams who also owns dozens and dozens of X.news sites in order to get around being blacklisted from FB and other social media sites.

He's an anti-modern medicine, holistic natural healing weirdo quack. After reading the article and seeing his pseudoscientific and biased language, this now makes perfect sense. I wouldn't trust anything from any of his sites.

I'm not saying the hypothesis is incorrect but this site is using biased language and not citing their sources properly. For example:

"A study published in the journal Cancer Discovery finds that lung cancer progresses when the lungs are forced to regurgitate microbes. Prolonged mask use creates a moist environment that cultivates microbes. This toxic environment not only forces the person to regurgitate their own wastes, but also inundates the lungs with microbes that cause a toxic environment that feeds lung cancer."

Only the first sentence is true of the published study. The rest of the paragraph is the author's opinion being attached to a published scientific journal.

The actual study doesn't mention mask use at all, in fact. Having said that, the rest of the paragraph might be true, but where is the source? Is mask use SIGNIFICANTLY (significant in scientific terms) affecting the microbe count on the face? How do you know, where's the study? If it is true, how many of these microbes are going back into the lungs? Is it a significant amount? There's plenty more of this in the article. I recommend going straight to the source material and doing your own research for the rest.

Graduated with a bio degree 7 years ago and not in a medical field so take this for what it's worth (nothing lol).

Coronavirus is a general term for a type of cold, yes. Pretty common knowledge If you've taken any bio course before. The common coronavirus has different types like NL63 or HKU1. "COVID-19" is specifically "novel coronavirus 2019" which means "a new type of coronavirus discovered in 2019".

Saying "coronavirus" is like saying "Honda" instead of "car". There's different types of vehicles, some are trucks, some are cars, some of the cars are Hondas. Of those Honda cars, there is an Accord, a Civic etc,

A "novel Honda 2021" would be a new Honda model that nobody has ever seen before... Maybe it's similar or maybe it has 6 wheels and runs on maple syrup. Still considered a Honda, even if it's very different.

I'd consider taking it if the actual long term trials look good and more information comes out about what COVID can do to those who catch it and survive. The 99% survival rate is one thing but if there is severe, permanent trauma in the respiratory system as a result then it would be worth taking.

Anyone saying they'd 100% not take it is just being stubborn. I fully support waiting for more research to be done and to not fold just because the gubmint tells you to, but if things look promising in the future, don't risk getting your lungs maimed for political points.

He's not wrong though, that website sucks dick. The article is full of biased language, assumptions and speculation.

Everything in it might ultimately be true, that's fine, but we shouldn't treat it like it's a medical journal or some shit.

Oh, didn't you see the report by [alphabet agency]? White domestic terrorists are the number one threat in America now.

Fuck that "article".

"Is there a relationship? We'll never know."

Actually we do know... "No" is the answer.

Or it's just a stupid shitty show with bad choreography.

If vaguely resembling a devil was such a terrible offense, I'd never be able to listen to any of the music I enjoy (metal).

I highly doubt any of these idiots even considered your perspective... They just wanted to look cool

He can still run (if he even wants to) if he's impeached again.

The Senate has to convict and specifically vote to bar him from holding a future office.

They also stone people to death in the streets and put tires around people's waists and light them on fire for alleged crimes so I wouldn't put too much stock into them having the moral and social high ground.

Regards.

Throwing around offensive terms (faggot, cunt, nagger, etc) is a very old message board tactic to weed out the overly-sensitive and the PC-police.

Nobody here gives a single shit about whether someone is gay or not, and especially don't hate gay people. Maybe a few here or there but I bet the vast majority even has a couple gay friends or acquaintances.

Speaking of, one of my super gay giant bear friends loves calling people faggots when they're being overly-sensitive and it makes me laugh every time.

But bro, it's "just an amendment"! That means it can be repealed!

You know where Twitter stock opened 7 years ago?

If you invested in 2013, you actually lost money (inflation). Twitter is nothing, a blip in the economy that barely makes $1bn a year thanks in part to the 88 million followers of Trump's Twitter (RIP) and his enormous daily engagements from daily users. Without him and with other conservative users leaving or being banned, Twitter will remain a retarded dog with a loud bark that still isn't worth the time or money to pay attention to. Better to just put it out to pasture.

"experts"

They LOVE their Appeal to Authority Fallacy, don't they?

It's funny that nobody gave a shit when BLM destroyed cities and statues and private businesses but as soon as protesters take their grievances to the people who are actually responsible it's an atrocity

"TerroriSes"

🧐 I'm on to you, you limey Brit.

This is what Soros DOES. How can people not see this?

Even on Rogan MONTHS ago, they were talking about what the enemies of America want. It's not Trump. It's not Biden (though they'd prefer it). It's to make Western philosophy, specifically democracy, look bad. To make our election process look unreliable and illegitimate... And they're succeeding.

"Yeah... I know we live under a tyrannical authoritarian/Communist regime, but look at the alternative! I think I'll stick with my free 10 pounds of rice a month and 60 hour work week over THAT."

Good point

I agree, well said

Jews tend to be the smartest in the room and their culture tends to push them toward higher learning as opposed to athletics, performance, trade schools etc... The exception being comedy as again, their culture promotes a self-deprecating type of humor. A majority of financial institutions and top level positions in other fields being made up of mostly Jewish people shouldn't be surprising.

This doesn't mean you're wrong, but it also doesn't necessarily mean there's some kind of conspiracy.