I agree with this proposal, and while we're at it, we should toss the ADL onto the scrap heap as well. Each of those worthless organizations basically serves as both a mouthpiece and a slush fund for the DNC anyway.
The craziest thing is that, even during a likely prerecorded speech in which Biden read exclusively off the teleprompter, he still managed to utter at least a few gaffes. But hey, according to leftists, Sleepy Joe is absolutely capable of going toe-to-toe with President Trump in an unscripted debate setting (assuming that there actually are debates).
It feels nice to currently have a president who actually respects our military and who has made a conscious effort to strengthen it during his tenure thus far. I can't really say that I'm surprised, though, considering that a younger Trump was enrolled in a military academy for several years.
Thanks for sharing the link to that most interesting study; the researchers' findings there are definitely food for thought.
As to your second point, it's indeed unfortunate that leftists in this country have gotten such an iron grip on so many aspects of our society. Luckily for us, though, more and more people over the past few years have started to recognize the truth about the left's perverse agenda. We can only hope that that widespread enlightenment will lead to a positive election result on Nov. 3.
Honestly, I'm not so sure that that's a clever strategy.
In my view, many of these political prognosticators are ignoring three pretty significant factors. First, the president's overall support is vastly understated in the polls, because some people are apprehensive about revealing their true opinions for various reasons. Next, based on certain data that we've already seen, the enthusiasm from the more outspoken Trump backers far surpasses any excitement that leftists have for Biden.
Finally, since some of these predictions show Trump potentially facing an uphill climb, that automatically makes him the underdog here. If anything, I imagine that they will only serve to further energize both the president's supporters and some undecided voters, because average people like to root for a perceived underdog. Plus, I think that given Trump's personality, he relishes being in such a position anyway.
Save for a handful of reliable sources, the media will remain mostly silent about this scheme, because the foreign meddling in this case stands to benefit Democrats. It's quite hypocritical, considering that those same outlets spent two-and-a-half years vilifying Trump for supposed Russian collusion in the 2016 election (which was proven to be false, as we knew all along).
That's a good point. In 2016, it was essentially the Libertarian Party voters who ultimately made the difference in Minnesota. I think that if Trump can obtain some of the former Gary Johnson supporters in Minnesota this time, then the president has a decent chance to emerge victorious in that state. However, as we should know, winning there will certainly not be an easy task.
A Republican presidential candidate has not won the state of Minnesota since Nixon in 1972. A sign like this gives me hope that President Trump can end that decades-long streak of Democrat victories there in November.
Yes, I've seen Attkisson's name previously mentioned on this forum in reference to strong investigate journalists. I don't really keep up with her, but I will certainly check out her website to view some of her work. Thanks for the link, fellow pede.
I agree that the commentator description does apply to Tucker to an extent, particularly during his opening monologues every night. However, many of his interview segments have proven that he is also capable of true objectivity. Compare Tucker's respective interviews with Phil Murphy and Jim Jordan from recently; Tucker's views are generally similar to Jordan's opinions, but he still grilled Jordan every bit as hard as Murphy.
As for Sara Carter, I don't follow her very much, but I've heard nothing but praise for her intensive investigate reporting.
Fantastic post, fellow pede. I'm largely on the same page as you when it comes to this particular topic. Not only does marriage completely fail the cost-benefit analysis from a man's perspective, but also, many women's ridiculously high standards (as you said) make even pursuing them a big waste of time. Men are simply better off remaining single and enjoying life, while always striving to improve themselves.
My only disagreement is with your remarks about prenups. Based on certain things that I've read, prenups aren't always foolproof, and some judges can choose to just throw them out for various reasons. That's merely a minor critique, though.
I find it somewhat interesting that many of the men on this forum understand the reality about politics and the media, yet can't bring themselves to swallow the red pill about women. Fortunately, there are plenty of us here who do know this truth.
President Trump has been, without a doubt, much tougher on China than any of his immediate predecessors, and this WeChat executive order further demonstrates his no-nonsense approach. It's no wonder, then, why the communist Chinese government is hoping that Biden edges out a victory in November.
I think that Barr is receiving a bagpipes lesson right now. When he returns to his office at the DOJ later, maybe he'll sit at his desk and write a strongly worded letter to Twitter's executives. That will surely have a positive impact!
That sort of reaction wouldn't surprise me in the least. The lemmings have all but proven by now that they're incapable of basic critical thought, and that they most likely will never do the proper research in order to become enlightened. BLM and its media allies depend on that willful ignorance; otherwise, they'd be unable to efficiently push their radical agenda.
In my view, BLM is pretty much a modern version of the Black Panthers, but with a more palatable name that is intended to deceive the general public. In reality, the violent tactics and main goals of both organizations are very similar.
Yes, that's right. I don't really follow Carter or Attkisson that closely myself, but based on everything that I've heard about them, their investigative work seems to be rather solid as well.
As to your other comment, I certainly agree that there are some additional reliable media figures out there who we're forgetting to mention at the moment. Nevertheless, it's still a pretty small group on the whole, which is unfortunate.
I wonder if Herschel Walker was a late addition to the list of tonight's guest speakers. Nevertheless, he gave a fine speech about his positive relationship with Trump.