Actual article describes the area pretty well.
In theory, if a small business attracts shareholders (let's say your uncle invests 10%), then those shareholders would get their share of income, from which they would pay tax as if it was capital gain. Theoretical saving would be from not having to pay social security and medicare taxes.
The assumption is that shareholder does not work and is just an investor.
However if there is one or two shareholders, then IRS requires that shareholders pay themselves a reasonable wage. If such a wage is not paid, then, IRS has a right to impose additional taxes and penalties.
It is important to understand that this type of law is for the people who are at a top bracket in their profession or business. Simply put, very rarely there are salaries that would pay above $500K per year. The rest of it comes from the skillful use of capital, political connections, or benefiting from good organization of labour.
What we need is a small but silent organization, that is a lean mean litigation machine.
Antifa does not follow the logic, nor they follow the laws.
We should be doing the work that normally Attorney Generals should be doing.
We need Trump to craft some sort of executive order.
A blow to democratic state school systems.
Basically, if a state system is dysfunctional, a family can opt out, and get the money right away.
Things will be challenged, but in 2021 Ruth Ginsburg will be burning in hell, we can fill SCOTUS with the based judge, and have a real and rational choice.
Mingling with mentally challenged has always been a questionable activity, through centuries.
Compassion and help for those who need help should not be confused with the acceptance of mentally impaired fringe.
They have every right to exist, but please stay away from the kids and families.
It probably is within the boundaries of the Constitution, if taken within the context of the greatest economic depression that this country is in.
At the same time social security, the way it is structured as a ponzi scheme, is immoral, unsound mathematically.
In the grand scheme of things, Trump cannot be seen as immoral, on something that was immoral institution, to begin with. I am simply pointing to the observation that moral and good things do not necessarily require the laws.
There are people somwhere who hate you. Not just a hate, but racial irrational hate.
If you remember, they are making "mute white people" in some apps.
Google made that a default option.