I know this might surprise you l, but there are very much so pede’s who don’t believe. Or at least in my case are completely agnostic.
Yes people do die of it just like people die of the flu you Qtarded piece of shit. Just because numbers are exaggerated doesn’t make the actual virus fake.
That’s somewhat fair. My main criticism is him pushing this as you say as, reverse engineering. He’s only about half way so far. It is understanding it a decent amount, but not enough yet. I just think if this is presented to the public as a finished product it would be in their eyes debooonked and then when a full reverse engineer is put out it’s automatically brushed off
No don’t think I can oblige that. Maybe get a thicker skin
Ya applied math grad degree, this guy is autismo maximo. At the end of the day, he explained weighted counting in the most convoluted was possible. Just understand a weighted count, with probably a small randomness factor (normal, binomial, etc) is being used. Just fit the data with the weight then using an I sample portion then test against other districts from an out-of-sample portion.
I have no idea it’s so idiotic it seems straight up malicious
I have no idea. It seems so idiotic it’s malicious.
Awesome thank you for the query. Ima take a look and probably start a thread on the results sometime soon.
Quant trader here out of curiosity what ststitistical test did you use? And I really mean actual statistical test like wilcoxon rank sum, sign test, etc etc, I’ve been curious to look into this too but haven’t had time.
Dude you might be retarded if you think Silicon Valley has all the servers lol. Both AWS and azure have multiple regions each with availability zones and redundant center all over the country lol.
Ya it’s talking about limits of precision in term of floating point number (2.35644) in programming. This is regarding the only reasonable thing shiva mentioned which is if voted were stored in floating point form then this would tell you the upper bound of precision error when converted back into integers.
To give a break down ||U||_infinity is as someone mentioned is an infinite norm, the real term is uniform norm. This is the max of the absolute values of a vector. basically in a vector of (2, -4, 7) this equals 7. It a form of normalization. To get a better idea about normalization look at the 2 norm. The divisor is the same just for a different variable. The n^(log(n)/2) is the Supermum (least upper bound) of the precision. This is due to the fact that floating point numbers are still stored as but this conversion from floating point to int have a precision limit.
The is in regards to shiva a claim that votes are stored as floating point number. If true is a flagrant error, but after his bullshit statistical analysis which is useless, I’m skeptical of him. Braynard is the guy to look to since he uses analysis to grab a group of people to call to verify
Edit: A and U are the floating point number and integer. Not necessarily respectively I don’t care to solve which is which right now
This is just the least upper bound (supremum) of precision occurring during conversion between floating point numbers and int. It’s not a ration changer, or algorithm a proof of vote miscount if votes are stored as floating points. Read my other comment here to see a full explanation of the equation. Also U and A are the floating point number and int not in that order necessarily.
Also it’s good you’re no shiva his stats analysis is utter bullshit, his claim of huge miscount if votes are stored as floating points is valid, but I’m very skeptical of him.
Ya it’s talking about limits of precision in term of floating point number (2.35644) in programming. This is regarding the only reasonable thing shiva mentioned which is if voted were stored in floating point form then this would tell you the upper bound of presiding when converted back into integers.
To give a break down ||U||_infinity is as someone mentioned is an infinite norm, the real term is uniform norm. This is the max of the absolute values of a vector. basically in a vector of (2, -4, 7) this equals 7. It a form of normalization. To get a better idea about normalization look at the 2 norm. The divisor is the same just for a different variable.
The n^(log(n)/2) is the Supermum (least upper bound) of the precision. This is due to the fact that floating point numbers are still stored as but this conversion from floating point to int have a precision limit.
The is in regards to shiva a claim that votes are stored as floating point number. If true is a flagrant error, but after his bullshit statistical analysis which is useless, I’m skeptical of him. Braynard is the guy to look to since he uses analysis to grab a group of people to call to verify.
It also made the US more prosperous. On the gold standard we would be a lot less competitive. And yes I do say it has not destroyed our economy. You keep bringing up “issues” which I’ve explained actually help the US and now you’re relegated to calling floating currencies “degenerate” and talking about culture because the numbers don’t work in you favor. Lol dude I get it you don’t understand economics, you and AOC would be a match made in heaven in terms of economic knowledge
Wait are you actually arguing we should have NO inflation? If so I guess we’re done. There’s not convincing someone this stupid of anything. Take a look at what happens to economies without inflation the crumble, and for good reason.
Maybe go actually study a topic before you spout bullshit economics as bad as AOC’s because you FEEEELLLL you’re right. I’ll continue to actually work in trading and understand the topic at hand.
Ok I get you have no idea how modern economies run and why the world has been so prosperous in the past 50 ish years. Listen I’m not going to argue with you because you’re going to spout nonsense like the data supports your idea when it doesn’t. I get it you FEEEEEELLLL like you’re right. I guess I should go tell the forex desk at the fund I work at to just stop trading guys, idindunuffin said it just fake. Lol get real maybe actually read some actual books on the subject.
Growth comes from a lot more than deficient spending. Companies absolutely need credit to grow. The creates stability and on extreme circumstances liquidity. Credit liquidity is the basis of any modern economy. When it locks up you have another Great Depression on your hands. But yes let’s go against all the actual data and move back to an outdated and poor standard for our economy because as far as you can tell it’s good...
taps head meme
Overall the gold standard is a terrible measure of economic health. There are so many facets to the economy that tying the measure of economies on one rare earth metal is not only inefficient but misleading. It might sound weird but currencies really are a measure of economic health. This is reflected in their exchange rates. Without them being able to float those rates are artificially created outside of supply and demand.
For example gold doesn’t account for factors like purchasing power parity, gdp, and the handful of factors which determine a currencies strength. I’m not a huge expert on forex since I work on volatility and fixed income derivatives, but I can think of a way that you can represent relative strength between economies with the gold standard. Also I can’t think of the benefits. All economic factors we see now such as Inflation still happen anyway
Ya and floating currencies allow for economic growth in a much more natural manner. The gold standard actually put a massive artificial range on that. Currencies also follow supply and demand mostly based on economic health. Gold is a terrible measure of that
inflation happens either way as it shows even from 1913. Gold standard or not it’s a natural economic phenomenon not theft lol. Without inflation economies die.
What you talk about, “slowly” exapnding the market causes huge issues. The biggest being artificial limit on growth. It’s absolutely more manipulated that floating currencies. That doesn’t even begin to encompass the fact that gold is a terrible measure for economic health, something exchange rates encompass they’d be a proxy for gold market if that’s all it was. Again a mispecification for economic health. Don’t get me wrong metrics like purchasing power parity which account for 93 percent of the variance in exchange rates aren’t better but they are light years ahead of gold. What year do you think it is. 1650?
If you have actual economic reasons not vague statements please comment back if not and you just think monetary theory is some weird conspiracy then we go nothin to talk about with talking past each other
Removing the gold standard was a good thing. The Bretton-Woods system of currency exchange was not by any means efficient or market driven. Floating currencies are much better and allow for more economic growth.
How many times does Q have to get things constantly wrong and fuck you in the ass before you realize you’re not being probed by aliens
I’m assuming dominion would have to let the plaintiff (trump team) examine it? Or can they get a neutral third party? Because that’s an error the would be glaringly obvious
Out of the more than 80 million of us I think I’ll be ok pissing off a couple like you for entertainment.