2
Based_psychologist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Harris/Biden administration.

6
Based_psychologist 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bongino killed it!

6
Based_psychologist 6 points ago +6 / -0

Con-man stands for confidence man. Walk with confidence and you can do a lot, for good or for evil.

1
Based_psychologist 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sure get hostile in a hurry, which confirms my original opinion. It’s an operator error. Nothing wrong with the site—the problem is you and/or your phone.

2
Based_psychologist 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do I find an official list of .win channels? Pardon my suspicion.

2
Based_psychologist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably the I.D-10t error. It’s rampant.

4
Based_psychologist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Now compare that rate with general population.

The suicide rate among transgender adults in an international study was almost 800 per 100,000. In comparison, the suicide rate in the U.S. for all people is 14 per 100,000

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00918369.2011.534038

7
Based_psychologist 7 points ago +7 / -0

I am so grateful for people willing to take on impossible odds because it’s the right thing. I’m looking at you, Alamo. They lost, but the effects of the battle were profound. So should they have fought? I’m glad they did. You don’t think Trump has considered the likelihood that he and his entire empire would be crushed by the swamp? You take calculated risks, and in positions of power you take a big calculated risks. Win, lose, mistakes, or flawed, I will forever tip my hat to the man who stood between me and the enemy.

1
Based_psychologist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Disagree. There is some truth in what you’re saying, but the heart is easily swayed and often deeply inaccurate. Belief in a dogmatic statement like that is how transgenderism became a thing.

422
Based_psychologist 422 points ago +427 / -5

I’m glad she still fighting. I don’t buy the accusation that she is false. But I do think as time goes on the likelihood of her succeeding goes down. Still glad she’s fighting. Because I’m not in a professional position where I can fight with as much power as she has. Will it be enough? Time will tell.

20
Based_psychologist 20 points ago +24 / -4

Crazy thing, I can both vote and do my best to support election integrity as well. Maybe it will do nothing, and I would be willing to go so far as to discuss about whether or not it likely will do nothing. But you know what I can be sure will guarantee a loss? Not voting.

It’s like trying to patch things up with a distant relative or a rocky relationship with a parent or spouse. It may not be likely. It may be tough to do. There may be risk involved. But choosing inaction is promising a negative outcome.

2
Based_psychologist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don’t know anything about it. Tell me more

5
Based_psychologist 5 points ago +5 / -0

There is some truth in what you’re, but I contend that the much greater threat is still the Democrat party whose ideology is opposed to our country’s founding principles rather than the some among the Republican Party who are weak and/or corrupt. There are those in the R camp who are part of a uniparty, but far from all. We do need people focusing on both, but I also think there is a concerted effort to make us all mistrustful of each other, all Conservatives, and to fracture our focus on potential boogie men rather than uniting against the clear enemies of our country.

17
Based_psychologist 17 points ago +17 / -0

Mission “shatter any unity among Conservatives” successful. We aren’t looking at the left as much when we are side-eyeing each other.

10
Based_psychologist 10 points ago +10 / -0

Well that basically is the green new deal. An enormous amount of basic materials, dirty mining /manufacturing, and fossil fuels used to create something that at the final product level doesn’t use fossil fuels.

They’re in space! They’re not using fuel!… How do you think they got there?

It’s solar power! It’s not using fuel!… How do you think that was created?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›