14

They still want to impeach Trump? What would that mean exactly? (I'm assuming they will get it done, now that dems have the senate) No chance of Trump being president anymore?

351
11

Now there is a lot of theory going on about wether or not Trump still has something up his sleeve.

I don't know how trump truly feels about violence. I read a post here recently outlining, that it is good strategy for trump supporters to try out the boundaries a bit (like we saw yesterday), so as to maintain aggression and ensure a winning momentum, but for trump to basically play good cop.

But from what I have seen, Trump genuinely doesn't seem to want to create massive civil clashes.

So if that is so, I can't really imagine Trump pulling out something out of his sleeve now, even if he perhaps has something. It would just cause exactly what I mentioned before.

Feel free to change my mind.

THANKS MODS!

19
100% of the swamp: (www.youtube.com) 🚫CENSORED🚫
posted ago by BattleKing ago by BattleKing
12

Aggressively push a narrative and ridicule the opposing narrative.

(the reason why the "fact-checks" work in part is only as a means to both push a narrative and by forcibly putting it next to the opposing one, ridiculing it immediately)

So apparently Putin gave the order to take out Navalny with the nerve agent Novitchok when the latter anounced his candidacy for president. Part of the group invested in the research that led to this conclusion is... CNN. Immediate suspicion (which is quite sad, since our news agencies should be our most powerful weapons).

So the claim is, that through flight logs and geolocations obtained through mobile phones, a group of FSB agents were following around Navalny pretty much everywhere he went, tried to poison him once (he felt sick for about 15 minutes), then (intentionally or accidentally) poisoned his wife and now the third time they actually got him, but he didn't die. Several labs supposedly confirmed the nerve agent to be present in Navalny.

So having said all of that. I don't recall details, but I remember the Salisbury attack (essentially also an alleged novitchok poisoning by Russians) being fishy as well. I know for sure that CNN knows how to do fake news. I know that there is a lot of misinformation about /propaganda against Putin.

From what it seems to me, based nationalist. could be wrong. Haven't got any info to debunk the story (although the effort to debunk frequently is a mistake.. politics 101 never explain yourself. Push your narrative and ridicule opposition is more effective)

So what are your thoughts on this?

12

We are not the Party of George W. Fuck him. We are not the movement behind Mitch McConnell. We don't give a rats ass about Romney. We already forgot about McCain. Heck.. We are not the party of Reagan. We are not even the party of Abraham Lincoln (no disrespect). WE are the party of American patriots, we are populists and.. say it with me...

WE ARE THE PARTY OF DONALD J. TRUMP!!!

10

My understanding is, that he has to (or can) certify the electoral college votes. I he does, that’s it and on to the inauguration we go, but what happens if he doesn’t? Also am I correct in believing, that pence vote is not just relevant in a tie scenario?

17
18

Donald Trump don't trust Fox News! Fox News is ASSHOE!

19
11

Thanks pedes

17

BEST CHRISTMAS GIFT EVER!

42

With a corrupted news media, entertainment industry, education system, politicians and political activists, spying on political enemies, impeaching over nothing burger, lockdowns and a rigged election I find it quite hard to see how we can talk about American freedom.

WE NEED AMERICAN BRAVERY! God bless you all pedes, hold the line!

28

There is no evidence that anyone was killed or that anyone lied. We all have to come together and forget our differences!

23
105

BANNED DOT VIDEO!!! INFOWARS DOT COM!!!!

25

Kinda wondering, since I don't really recall any big wins that delivered concrete results so far. I understand, the process takes time, but does anyone have a clue, as to when the next big dominoes will fall?

72
view more: Next ›