3
Belleoffreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Scroll down to find a 7-minute video showing a competent judge in action.

His job is to keep the proceedings from going off the rails, and he does it in a clear, straightforward, and temperate manner.

1
Belleoffreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Putin commented during the 2016 election that the US was always accusing Russia publicly, and sending backchannel messages that everything was ok. He was tired of it. He was talking about Hillary's behavior.

1
Belleoffreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

She's somebody from another State, apparently picking fights as she goes. The reference to Maskless Henry has nothing to do with the story at the link.

409
Belleoffreedom 409 points ago +422 / -13

Putin is not "our guy." He is a foreign Head of State. That State has some interests in common with us, and some opposed.

He is former KGB, and if he is not a killer, he has certainly cultivated that aspect of his public image.

He's smart, he's reliably loyal to the interests of his country, and for those reasons we can have a little bit of comfort in our dealings with him.

He is not, for example, going to turn ballistic missiles loose on us, like the Mad Mullahs in Iran will do if they get the power to do so, nor is he going to set a bioweapon loose to crash economies worldwide.

So, right now, Russia is in better hands than Iran and China, which is an awfully low bar.

4
Belleoffreedom 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those aren't Liberals saying that. Those are totalitarians.

3
Belleoffreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fine by me. I have my zinc and ionophore on hand. It's fine if you do you, so long as you keep your mitts off me.

1
Belleoffreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Democrats will have a say in this, and none of this will pass.

2
Belleoffreedom 2 points ago +3 / -1

If you want to get rid of the Constitution, this is how it's done.

The first thing to go will be not Bill of Rights.

Don't be stupid.

3
Belleoffreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Under DJT, the vaccines were to be voluntary.

And if there weren't unsettling evidence of adverse side effects, demand would be bigger than it is.

1
Belleoffreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you have not had the disease (don't have antibodies) and you are not vaccinated, you need to be alert to any mild sniffle, and treat it at the onset of symptoms. This disease starts out mild, and worsens suddenly.

If you feel like you are coming down with something, take some zinc, preferably with an ionophore (Quercetin is available over the counter in the B vitamin section of many health food stores). This combination is good for knocking out a cold or flu, too.

This is a very good time to take D, 5,000 - 10,000 IU; C 1,000mg; a multivitamin with trace selenium daily. Shortages of these vitamins are associated with bad outcomes in various studies. Americans, especially black Americans, are short on D. D takes about a week to be converted to its active form, so it's good to be on it before getting infected.

Outpatient protocol for COVID-19 is at table 4, scroll for it.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-Ivermectin-in-the-prophylaxis-and-treatment-of-COVID-19.pdf

You don't have to believe all the amped-up hype to take this disease seriously: just catch it early.

3
Belleoffreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

The numbers of people affected by adverse side effects are miniscule. An early Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report of the Pfizer vaccine rollout noted that of more than 1.8 million Americans who got the vaccine, only 4,300 total reported adverse effects. (That’s one-fifth of a percent of the people who got doses.)

The standard for severe adverse side effects of a vaccine is 1 in a million, so there should be no more than 2 out of this sample.

This article does not quote a figure for severe adverse events.

Instead, it lumps everything in, and claims the number is low (it's not). The whole article is vague and misleading, apparently purposely so.

by zastels
8
Belleoffreedom 8 points ago +15 / -7

The virus is real; the illness is real. It can kill you, or more likely if you are young and healthy, put you in the hospital for a couple of months, with lasting effect, namely kidney and lung damage.

The tests, as administered, give false positives. This has led to a belief that the disease does not exist, because a lot of healthy people have tested positive.

The gaslighting by our government, media, and China, has been enormous and unconscionable. The disease has been used as an excuse to do things that would otherwise be completely unacceptable.

Masks do not work. The best effect the CDC could find is 1.5% reduction in cases.

We have good, effective, cheap outpatient treatments that should be begun at the onset of symptoms. These include zinc plus an ionophore (hydroxychloroqine or Quercetin) for 5 days, plus C, D, and trace selenium on a daily basis. Ivermectin is also useful both early and later.

If viral replication is inhibited soon enough, 5 days of antiviral treatment will stop new virus being made. Then, symptom treatment for the damage to the body may still be needed.

By the time shortness of breath develops, the patient is in real trouble. Inhaled corticosteroids are good for shortness of breath, and antibiotics are needed to head off co-infections.

This article explains treatment for COVID-19 well, scroll down to Table 4, for treatment protocols.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-Ivermectin-in-the-prophylaxis-and-treatment-of-COVID-19.pdf

TLDR: The disease is real. We have good treatments for it. Treatment needs to start early, just like the flu.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›